Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 357574 times)

0 Members and 26 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline The General

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #540 on: September 24, 2020, 05:21:16 PM »
it seems the vast majority of informants are criminals...havent heard any complaints before.....but CB wont be convicted on the informants evidence...there will need to be far more and if hes innocent that evidence wont exist
Always a double-edged sword using snitches; they've got decent information, but when it gets to court it can look tainted.
The ones that subsequently give interviews to anyone with a pen or a camera, well, they're rendered useless, as not only is the information 'tainted', the informant is pursuing a commercial decision.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #541 on: September 24, 2020, 05:33:46 PM »
Has it escaped certain people’s notice that if Brueckner wanted to get into people trafficking he need look no further than his old mate for connections and advice ?

Secondly if the parents performed the one off criminal act of ‘disappearing’ their daughter’s body after a terrible accident what terrible stories would acquaintances have ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #542 on: September 24, 2020, 05:42:44 PM »
Always a double-edged sword using snitches; they've got decent information, but when it gets to court it can look tainted.
The ones that subsequently give interviews to anyone with a pen or a camera, well, they're rendered useless, as not only is the information 'tainted', the informant is pursuing a commercial decision.

I see snitches as intelligence... Telling investigators where to look for evidence and who to look at.
As you say Fulscher claims proof of innocence
Wolters claims enough evidence to show CB killed MM... They can't both be right and we will soon know who is.
I feel sceptics reject the evidence because it contradicts their conviction of the mccanns guilt.. Wheras for supporters it's a perfect fit

Offline Anthro

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #543 on: September 24, 2020, 05:53:10 PM »
Has it escaped certain people’s notice that if Brueckner wanted to get into people trafficking he need look no further than his old mate for connections and advice ?

Secondly if the parents performed the one off criminal act of ‘disappearing’ their daughter’s body after a terrible accident what terrible stories would acquaintances have ?

I think there is little comparison between transporting illegal immigrants which is what Seyferth did, and human trafficking per se.

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #544 on: September 24, 2020, 07:40:58 PM »
So as your reaction in your post is why IMO, as D said, is the reason[that was my point in the first place]

Yet in 13 years not one negative story from friends of the mccanns in the papers

Is not proof that there isn't anyone who has a bad word to say about the mccs.

Its just it seems the media would not dare print it.

And the gaspars have already been dismissed by supporters anyhoo

I wonder why  they were not sued...
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #545 on: September 24, 2020, 07:43:28 PM »
And the gaspars have already been dismissed by supporters anyhoo

I wonder why  they were not sued...

im surprised you need to ask.. Im fairly sure such a statement given to the police is considered priveleged

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #546 on: September 24, 2020, 07:46:36 PM »
Always a double-edged sword using snitches; they've got decent information, but when it gets to court it can look tainted.
The ones that subsequently give interviews to anyone with a pen or a camera, well, they're rendered useless, as not only is the information 'tainted', the informant is pursuing a commercial decision.

Lest we forget, the reason for coming forward at this point in time. why not the day after she disappeared? There as a huge reard n offer fr some time... what would mak someone miss out on that opportunity at that time? hmm
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #547 on: September 24, 2020, 07:50:29 PM »
Lest we forget, the reason for coming forward at this point in time. why not the day after she disappeared? There as a huge reard n offer fr some time... what would mak someone miss out on that opportunity at that time? hmm

not sure if you have followed recent developments...wolters says he has enogh evidence...material evidnce...concrete evidence ...to show CB killed Maddie .  If thats the case ti informant deserves the reward.


Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #548 on: September 24, 2020, 07:59:19 PM »
not sure if you have followed recent developments...wolters says he has enogh evidence...material evidnce...concrete evidence ...to show CB killed Maddie .  If thats the case ti informant deserves the reward.

The informant deserves to be tazered anally every day he withheld the 'information' IMO.

I suppose he is keeping the charge sheet a secret? If, and this is a big IF,   CB told the informant rat is is possible the rat was a co opted member of the 'secret' therefore withheld evidence and possibly was involved in some way, and trying to pin all the blame on his 'fiend'  (yes should be friend) but fiend is also appropriate.IMO
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #549 on: September 24, 2020, 08:07:09 PM »
I think there is little comparison between transporting illegal immigrants which is what Seyferth did, and human trafficking per se.

Are they both criminal offences ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #550 on: September 24, 2020, 08:08:59 PM »
And the gaspars have already been dismissed by supporters anyhoo

I wonder why  they were not sued...

Curious that supporters believe the accusations of three criminals yet not the accusations of two doctors.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #551 on: September 24, 2020, 08:10:08 PM »
The informant deserves to be tazered anally every day he withheld the 'information' IMO.

I suppose he is keeping the charge sheet a secret? If, and this is a big IF,   CB told the informant rat is is possible the rat was a co opted member of the 'secret' therefore withheld evidence and possibly was involved in some way, and trying to pin all the blame on his 'fiend'  (yes should be friend) but fiend is also appropriate.IMO

sorry but your post  is  sounding more than a little crazy

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #552 on: September 24, 2020, 08:12:40 PM »
Curious that supporters believe the accusations of three criminals yet not the accusations of two doctors.

i believe what the evidence supports ...not who make the accusations...thats a basic tenet of the justice system which appears to have passed you by..

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #553 on: September 24, 2020, 08:23:56 PM »
i believe what the evidence supports ...not who make the accusations...thats a basic tenet of the justice system which appears to have passed you by..

Once again, very slowly for the hard of thinking....there is no evidence in the public domain that connects Brueckner to Madeleine’s disappearance.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #554 on: September 24, 2020, 08:27:39 PM »
Once again, very slowly for the hard of thinking....there is no evidence in the public domain that connects Brueckner to Madeleine’s disappearance.

there is ...dont assume everyone finds thinking as hard as you do