Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 358359 times)

0 Members and 15 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #660 on: September 27, 2020, 06:42:21 PM »
out of interest what aspect of DP’s words or deeds led YM to believe he was a paedophile?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #661 on: September 27, 2020, 06:52:29 PM »
out of interest what aspect of DP’s words or deeds led YM to believe he was a paedophile?
It was previous history wasn't it?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #662 on: September 27, 2020, 06:58:00 PM »
It was previous history wasn't it?

There was none.  She only thought there was.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #663 on: September 27, 2020, 06:59:23 PM »
It was previous history wasn't it?
Would you care to share what you knpw about DP’s paedo history?  With cites please.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #664 on: September 27, 2020, 07:08:38 PM »
There was none.  She only thought there was.

Strange though that two professionals unknown to each other both had doubts about DP.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #665 on: September 27, 2020, 07:13:48 PM »
Would you care to share what you knpw about DP’s paedo history?  With cites please.
I was only asking another question.   You'd have to ask Yvonne Martin herself.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #666 on: September 27, 2020, 07:14:08 PM »
Strange though that two professionals unknown to each other both had doubts about DP.

This case has attracted quite a lot of nutters.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #667 on: September 27, 2020, 07:15:05 PM »
How would that work then ? If Katerina hadn’t given a statement about DP’s lewd behaviour who else would have told authorities?  I believe if the statement she gave had been proved to been made up she would have been in a damn sight more trouble professionally.

Yvonne Martin and Katerina Gaspar, both professional women, both had their doubts about DP.
Both of whom it's their professional  responsibility to raise an issue however unlikely.. Thats what they have in common

« Last Edit: September 27, 2020, 07:17:31 PM by Robittybob1 »

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #668 on: September 27, 2020, 07:16:26 PM »
Strange though that two professionals unknown to each other both had doubts about DP.
Remind me who was the other one?  Gaspers and Martin  OK I got it.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #669 on: September 27, 2020, 07:18:41 PM »
Strange though that two professionals unknown to each other both had doubts about DP.

I noticed that Gerry McCann mentioned him as having checked the McCann children on Wednesday 2nd, even though everyone else said he did no checks at all.

On Wednesday night, 2 May 2007, as well as he and his wife, he thinks that DP also went to his apartment to confirm that his children were well, not having reported to him any abnormal situation with the children.

He also said;

During the afternoon of that day the rest of the group members, including the children, were at the beach, [they] having returned at 18H30, the time at which he saw DP next to the tennis court. DAVID went to visit KATE and the children and returned close to 19H00, trying to convince the deponent to continue to play tennis
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN-10MAY.htm
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #670 on: September 27, 2020, 07:25:03 PM »
This case has attracted quite a lot of nutters.

Katerina was a friend of the parents and Yvonne Martin was a Social Services and Protection of Minors Manager so hardly nutters.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #671 on: September 27, 2020, 07:25:27 PM »
Nice to see our sceptic members on more comfortable territory - casting aspersions at the McCanns and their friends while the experienced professionals get on with the more serious, grown-up work of investigating Madeleine’s abduction by a stranger.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #672 on: September 27, 2020, 07:28:42 PM »
I noticed that Gerry McCann mentioned him as having checked the McCann children on Wednesday 2nd, even though everyone else said he did no checks at all.

On Wednesday night, 2 May 2007, as well as he and his wife, he thinks that DP also went to his apartment to confirm that his children were well, not having reported to him any abnormal situation with the children.

He also said;

During the afternoon of that day the rest of the group members, including the children, were at the beach, [they] having returned at 18H30, the time at which he saw DP next to the tennis court. DAVID went to visit KATE and the children and returned close to 19H00, trying to convince the deponent to continue to play tennis
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/GERRY-MCCANN-10MAY.htm

I’d bet my house that DP knew nothing about his alleged check and visit to Kate until much, much later.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #673 on: September 27, 2020, 07:32:30 PM »
Katerina was a friend of the parents and Yvonne Martin was a Social Services and Protection of Minors Manager so hardly nutters.

Anonymous Letter?  That doesn't sound very professional on the part of Yvonne Martin.

Katerina Gaspar was sitting between Gerry McCann and David Payne and she seriously thought they were talking about the sexual abuse of one of their daughters?

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #674 on: September 27, 2020, 07:36:06 PM »
I’d bet my house that DP knew nothing about his alleged check and visit to Kate until much, much later.
How can you prove it either way?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.