Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 357573 times)

0 Members and 26 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #705 on: September 28, 2020, 12:28:30 AM »
But she wouldn't have reported it at all if Madeleine hadn't disappeared.  All a bit too late by then, don't you think?

It’s never too late but that’s not to say that it wouldn’t have been better had she reported it earlier.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #706 on: September 28, 2020, 12:35:56 AM »
It’s never too late but that’s not to say that it wouldn’t have been better had she reported it earlier.

Especially since it was such a waste of Police Time for all that.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #707 on: September 28, 2020, 12:41:30 AM »
Especially since it was such a waste of Police Time for all that.

Are you saying that someone who suspects that child abuse is taking place shouldn’t report it just in case they’re wasting police time ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #708 on: September 28, 2020, 12:45:59 AM »
Are you saying that someone who suspects that child abuse is taking place shouldn’t report it just in case they’re wasting police time ?

Oh, the irony.

Now that has got to be the most ridiculous thing that you have ever said.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #709 on: September 28, 2020, 12:51:26 AM »
Oh, the irony.

Now that has got to be the most ridiculous thing that you have ever said.

Why ? Shouldn’t anyone who suspects child abuse report it ? Wouldn’t you ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #710 on: September 28, 2020, 12:56:28 AM »
Why ? Shouldn’t anyone who suspects child abuse report it ? Wouldn’t you ?

There's a time and a place for everything.

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #711 on: September 28, 2020, 12:59:43 AM »
Because two male Doctors simply do not talk across a female doctor in the process of discussing the sexual abuse of one of their daughters, especially when she has a young daughter of her own.

It just doesn't work though does it when visualising the scene.

They were sat at a large round table with Katarina sitting in the middle between David and Gerry.  The men were having a conversation.  A conversation which Katerina was unable to hear what either man was saying to the other, despite the fact they must have been speaking over her since she was seated in the middle between them.  But the men managed to hear each other well enough to have their conversation which was inaudible to the woman seated between them.

Katerina then had to be turned looking at David to see him making a gesture in the course of having a conversation with Gerry which was inaudible to her.  She then had to swivel around to see Gerry making a gesture in the course of the conversation which she couldn't hear despite being sat slap bang in the middle between them.

NO-ONE HERE HAS EVER SEEN THE ORIGINAL GASPAR STATEMENTS.
IN MY OPINION LEVY STRIKES AGAIN.

But Katerina's statement has certainly served it's purpose on this thread for defaming David Payne yet again ~ in other words LIBELLING him which is probably why this topic was removed from the public boards quite some time ago.
All the while deflecting from the thought that Brueckner ... who is a real criminal and convicted paedophile whose 'reputation' apparently must remain unsullied while we sling Off Topic filth at an innocent man.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #712 on: September 28, 2020, 01:02:01 AM »
There's a time and a place for everything.

Pardon ? Surely no time or place is ruled out when it comes to suspected child abuse ? It can Never be too late.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #713 on: September 28, 2020, 01:06:47 AM »
Pardon ? Surely no time or place is ruled out when it comes to suspected child abuse ? It can Never be too late.

In which way does this relate to the thread topic.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #714 on: September 28, 2020, 01:08:52 AM »
It just doesn't work though does it when visualising the scene.

They were sat at a large round table with Katarina sitting in the middle between David and Gerry.  The men were having a conversation.  A conversation which Katerina was unable to hear what either man was saying to the other, despite the fact they must have been speaking over her since she was seated in the middle between them.  But the men managed to hear each other well enough to have their conversation which was inaudible to the woman seated between them.

Katerina then had to be turned looking at David to see him making a gesture in the course of having a conversation with Gerry which was inaudible to her.  She then had to swivel around to see Gerry making a gesture in the course of the conversation which she couldn't hear despite being sat slap bang in the middle between them.

NO-ONE HERE HAS EVER SEEN THE ORIGINAL GASPAR STATEMENTS.
IN MY OPINION LEVY STRIKES AGAIN.

But Katerina's statement has certainly served it's purpose on this thread for defaming David Payne yet again ~ in other words LIBELLING him which is probably why this topic was removed from the public boards quite some time ago.
All the while deflecting from the thought that Brueckner ... who is a real criminal and convicted paedophile whose 'reputation' apparently must remain unsullied while we sling Off Topic filth at an innocent man.

Brueckner is a filthy paedophile, no one is arguing with that and he should certainly get the jail time he deserves. At this point however there is not one piece of evidence in the public domain that connects him directly to Madeleine’s disappearance. Are you saying that we should ignore the suspicions of a doctor who put her professional standing on the line to report a potential crime just because there are other criminals committing similar crimes ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #715 on: September 28, 2020, 01:10:49 AM »
In which way does this relate to the thread topic.

Perhaps you need to take that up with the member who started the discussion...remembering of course that you yourself contributed not two minutes ago to it.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #716 on: September 28, 2020, 01:14:50 AM »
Brueckner is a filthy paedophile, no one is arguing with that and he should certainly get the jail time he deserves. At this point however there is not one piece of evidence in the public domain that connects him directly to Madeleine’s disappearance. Are you saying that we should ignore the suspicions of a doctor who put her professional standing on the line to report a potential crime just because there are other criminals committing similar crimes ?

I am saying ... the topic of this thread is not libelling a named individual, it is "Is there more circumstantial  evidence against the mccanns than there is CB"

Please abide by forum rules and stick to the designated topic of the thread.

"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #717 on: September 28, 2020, 07:10:05 AM »
I am saying ... the topic of this thread is not libelling a named individual, it is "Is there more circumstantial  evidence against the mccanns than there is CB"

Please abide by forum rules and stick to the designated topic of the thread.

I don't see the difference between discussing the evidence in the files mentioning Robert Murat and the evidence mentioning David Payne. Off topic yes, but libelous? I think not.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #718 on: September 28, 2020, 07:15:37 AM »
I don't see the difference between discussing the evidence in the files mentioning Robert Murat and the evidence mentioning David Payne. Off topic yes, but libelous? I think not.
You mean like the evidence that Murat was fond of cats?  Would  it be ok to discuss that, perhaps in a new thread regarding the evidence against Murat?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #719 on: September 28, 2020, 08:02:16 AM »
Has any sceptic here or anywhere else ever said “just because DP made a “suggestive gesture” once a couple of years before Madeleine disappeared doesn’t mean he’s involved in Madeleine’s disappearance “?  because I have heard quite a few say something like “just because Bruckner is a burglar, a child abuser and a violent rapist doesn’t mean he’s involved in Madeleine’s disappearance “.  Which sceptics will now step forward and defend DP’s reputation in this way?  Anyone?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".