Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[jassi]

More efficient still would be to inform the public so that they don't waste valuable police time.

[Robittybob1]

I didn't know who D was.
Why you felt the need to make any reference to D  in your post is rather puzzling.
So you went.off topic.
Busy at the moment.
Will leave you to continue speculating about what or may not be happening with CB.

Using initials CB or D same difference to me.  Just a mission to keep up.

[Robittybob1]

The information about the supposed phone call is no longer being sought by SY,Wolters says his man acted alone,so the phone call by that can be ruled out,next.

But is the phonecall the one thing that establishes him in the area that night?   It was several hours before MM went missing, so it possible to suggest CB could be at least 2 hours driving distance beyond PdL at 9:48 PM.

[Brietta]

But is the phonecall the one thing that establishes him in the area that night?   It was several hours before MM went missing, so it possible to suggest CB could be at least 2 hours driving distance beyond PdL at 9:48 PM.

That is something the police do when conducting an investigation.  They join up the evidential links which either direct them to a suspect or lead them to discard that individual and move on directed by the evidence.

Three police forces consider there is sufficient evidence to suggest they already have the prime suspect in Madeleine McCann's abduction under lock and key for other criminal offences.

[G-Unit]

But is the phonecall the one thing that establishes him in the area that night?   It was several hours before MM went missing, so it possible to suggest CB could be at least 2 hours driving distance beyond PdL at 9:48 PM.

The phone call as described is a very tenuous link in my opinion.

[Anthro]

The phone call as described is a very tenuous link in my opinion.

That may be the case, however, considering Wolters’ statement that they are piecing together all the evidence, as if a puzzle. He said he’ll be silent until the end of the year.

[G-Unit]

That may be the case, however, considering Wolters’ statement that they are piecing together all the evidence, as if a puzzle. He said he’ll be silent until the end of the year.

Did he? Something else I seem to have missed.

[Anthro]

Did he? Something else I seem to have missed.

He told Sandra F that in the latest Sexta9 episode.

[barrier]

But is the phonecall the one thing that establishes him in the area that night?   It was several hours before MM went missing, so it possible to suggest CB could be at least 2 hours driving distance beyond PdL at 9:48 PM.

Exactly he could have been anywhere.
There's no one who suggest's he was there,Tannerman looks nothing like him,Mr Smith has according to press reports claimed he's nothing like the guy who was carrying a girl  (fitting a description to that of Madeleine),last bit attributed to Redwood.One child and one man unaccounted for,Smithman and Madeleine,find the first imo and it'll lead to the second.

[kizzy]

That may be the case, however, considering Wolters’ statement that they are piecing together all the evidence, as if a puzzle. He said he’ll be silent until the end of the year.

. He said he’ll be silent until the end of the year.

Well, good get out as any I suppose...imo

[barrier]

. He said he’ll be silent until the end of the year.

Well, good get out as any I suppose...imo

After the interviews of the 3 amigos back in 2014 it wasn't really known that they were ruled out by end of that year until Rowley gave an update in  2017,it'll be the same here imo.

[jassi]

He told Sandra F that in the latest Sexta9 episode.

What obscure viewing you must engage in 

[Anthro]

What obscure viewing you must engage in 

Meaning?

[jassi]

Meaning?

A Spanish language show is not the sort of viewing one would normally associate with someone living in South Africa, I would suggest.
So obviously you have very esoteric viewing habits.

[Anthro]

A Spanish language show is not the sort of viewing one would normally associate with someone living in South Africa, I would suggest.
So obviously you have very esoteric viewing habits.

Not only do I find your comment directed at me, presumptuous and ignorant but hugely offensive as well.