Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[barrier]

No one but no one can place the german suspect in or around the ocean club,Wolters doesn't even say he thinks his suspect took Madeleine out of 5a.

[Mr Gray]

No one but no one can place the german suspect in or around the ocean club,Wolters doesn't even say he thinks his suspect took Madeleine out of 5a.

HCW says he has enough evidence to show the suspect killed MM...

[barrier]

HCW says he has enough evidence to show the suspect killed MM...

No one but no one can place the german suspect in or around the ocean club,Wolters doesn't even say he thinks his suspect took Madeleine out of 5a.

[Mr Gray]

I find your post rather ridiculous..evidence of murder is whats important...however MM left 5a

[barrier]

I find your post rather ridiculous..evidence of murder is whats important...however MM left 5a

From the words of James,"those who find themselves ridiculous sit down next to me".

[Mr Gray]

From the words of James,"those who find themselves ridiculous sit down next to me".

I find that ridiculous too....the really important point is HCW's claim....which you want to continually ignore

[jassi]

I find your post rather ridiculous..evidence of murder is whats important...however MM left 5a

Murder, or just evidence of death ?

[Mr Gray]

Murder, or just evidence of death ?

I've posted the link many times.

As i recall the exact word he used was  "killed"...live on TV ...

[Mr Gray]

“We don’t have the body and no parts of the body, but we have enough evidence to say our suspect killed Madeleine McCann,” German prosecutor Hans Christian Wolters revealed to Australian TV show 60 Minutes.

What the evidence is remains unclear, however, Wolters also told the program detectives dug up 8,000 items, including files on hard drives and USB sticks, buried next to Bruckner’s dead dog at the property in Neuwegersleben, Germany.

Asked if any of the uncovered images were of the toddler, Wolters said, “At the moment, I am not allowed to comment on that, so I am not able to say if there are pictures or there are no pictures of Madeleine.”






https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXsXXxRek2Q......at 9.30.

[Wonderfulspam]

It is called evidence.  The police check evidence.  It's what they do to identify the bad guys. So I don't think they'll have a problem.

And who on earth said Madeleine was abducted at 8.30.  No-one but the abductor knows when she was taken but the one thing we can be sure of is that it was not the time you have intimated.  But I think you know that.

Since when did it become acceptable to state abduction as fact?

I don't recall seeing that rule change.

I think it's great news though, because in the interests of fairness & balance it means I'm free to state that Maddie died in the holiday apartment.

[Mr Gray]

Since when did it become acceptable to state abduction as fact?

I don't recall seeing that rule change.

I think it's great news though, because in the interests of fairness & balance it means I'm free to state that Maddie died in the holiday apartment.

It seems from last week even referring to Maddie as pretty requires an IMO

Since when did it become a fact that the parents did it..is an imo required by you ther...or are you exempt on grounds of .....

[Vertigo Swirl]

Since when did it become acceptable to state abduction as fact?

I don't recall seeing that rule change.

I think it's great news though, because in the interests of fairness & balance it means I'm free to state that Maddie died in the holiday apartment.

No change there then.

[barrier]

Since when did it become acceptable to state abduction as fact?

I don't recall seeing that rule change.

I think it's great news though, because in the interests of fairness & balance it means I'm free to state that Maddie died in the holiday apartment.

John wrote this back in August seems to be largely ignored.

A little reminder Brietta. There is nothing to connect Brueckner with Madeleine and there is no evidence Madeleine was even abducted so please bear this in mind.

As for Amaral, it is without doubt that he was made a scapegoat, whether he is right or not is still to be determined.

[Vertigo Swirl]

John wrote this back in August seems to be largely ignored.

It's quite ignorable IMO because there is evidence that Madeleine was abducted.  Of course some people prefer to ignore the evidence as is their prerogative but IMO either they shouldn't seek to impose their opinion as a fact on the rest of us or they should simply accept that we all have differing view points, and not get their knickers in a twist if one of us claims Madeleine was abducted. 

[Brietta]

I have no idea what you imagine I'm insinuating. Please explain.

I have already explained.  I'm afraid I cannot rectify your lack of comprehension regarding what I have posted.