Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[Mr Gray]

As far as I understand there are two possible charges here.  Abduction and Murder.  Brueckner could be guilty of both.

HCW seems to think so....and he is the one with access to all the evidence

[Mr Gray]

There were photos of Rui Pedro found on the dark web therefore it seems possible there are photos of MM

[Robittybob1]

I think its quite obvious. Going by CB's history its unlikely he killed Maddie in the   apt   more likely sbducted for abuse

Of course, I would never think CB killed Madeleine in the apartment.  In my theory, opinion or whatever you want to call it, Madeleine escaped the apartment and tried to get into the Tapas Restaurant.  If the door at the entrance to the Tapas area was closed how would Madeleine open it?
In a recent documentary I see the door handle to this door has been changed to a lever type, compared to the large round knob door handle that was there in 2007. 

As far as I understand there are two possible charges here.  Abduction and Murder.  Brueckner could be guilty of both.

 But surely a charge of murder would be sufficient (IMO).

[Eleanor]

Of course, I would never think CB killed Madeleine in the apartment.  In my theory, opinion or whatever you want to call it, Madeleine escaped the apartment and tried to get into the Tapas Restaurant.  If the door at the entrance to the Tapas area was closed how would Madeleine open it?
In a recent documentary I see the door handle to this door has been changed to a lever type, compared to the large round knob door handle that was there in 2007. 

 But surely a charge of murder would be sufficient (IMO).

No, it wouldn't be.  He could be found guilty of Abduction but not Murder.

[Robittybob1]

Look it is a fact that the door haNDLE HAS BEEN CHANGED.    "If the door at the entrance to the Tapas area was closed how would Madeleine open it?"  How was that handled on the night.  Kate had told Madeleine where they were dining (according to Fiona), but could she (Kate) guarantee that the Tapas entrance door was going to be open and accessible to a 3-4 year old kid at all times?  Imagine how the opportunity of a kid locked out on the street could be exploited by a person with the intentions of abducting a child.  In a situation like that a child would possibly approach an adult for assistance, in other words even more opportunity, she may have come to him for help to open the door.

No, it wouldn't be.  He could be found guilty of Abduction but not Murder.

How can he be charged with abduction unless someone saw him do it?
Is there evidence in the vehicle used in the crime?  I doubt it somehow after all these years.

[Eleanor]

Look it is a fact that the door haNDLE HAS BEEN CHANGED.    "If the door at the entrance to the Tapas area was closed how would Madeleine open it?"  How was that handled on the night.  Kate had told Madeleine where they were dining (according to Fiona), but could she (Kate) guarantee that the Tapas entrance door was going to be open and accessible to a 3-4 year old kid at all times?  Imagine how the opportunity of a kid locked out on the street could be exploited by a person with the intentions of abducting a child.  In a situation like that a child would possibly approach an adult for assistance, in other words even more opportunity, she may have came to him.

How can he be charged with abduction unless someone saw him do it?
Is there evidence in the vehicle used in the crime?  I doubt it somehow after all these years.

How can anyone be charged with anything if no one saw them do it?

[Robittybob1]

How can anyone be charged with anything if no one saw them do it?

Other evidence is possible.

[barrier]

As far as I understand there are two possible charges here.  Abduction and Murder.  Brueckner could be guilty of both.

Or not to the both of them as the case maybe.

[kizzy]

It is called evidence.  The police check evidence.  It's what they do to identify the bad guys. So I don't think they'll have a problem.

And who on earth said Madeleine was abducted at 8.30.  No-one but the abductor knows when she was taken but the one thing we can be sure of is that it was not the time you have intimated.  But I think you know that.

And who on earth said Madeleine was abducted at 8.30

Where did I say that someone said maddie was abducted at 8,30 I wish you would get things right when replying.

It was a point I made that you would think if there was an abductor around at 8 pm on a mobile why did he hang around for another hour and a half.

Why did he not just go in at 8.30 when the mccs left were he would have known he had plenty of time before checking started.

Why would he hang around then decide to go in right in the middle of all the checking?

[Mr Gray]

And who on earth said Madeleine was abducted at 8.30

Where did I say that someone said maddie was abducted at 8,30 I wish you would get things right when replying.

It was a point I made that you would think if there was an abductor around at 8 pm on a mobile why did he hang around for another hour and a half.

Why did he not just go in at 8.30 when the mccs left were he would have known he had plenty of time before checking started.

Why would he hang around then decide to go in right in the middle of all the checking?

You would need to ask CB

[The General]

You would need to ask CB

So would HCW - eventually.

[Mr Gray]

So would HCW - eventually.

If you want a better understanding of what's happening have a look in the German papers

[kizzy]

You would need to ask CB

So as I suspected no rational explanation...that's if there "was" an abductor of course. which imo there wasnt.

[Mr Gray]

So as I suspected no rational explanation...that's if there "was" an abductor of course. which imo there wasnt.

You suspected wrong. I have a rational explanation for everything you think is compelling evidence..the dogs... inconsistent statements... everything.
That's why the police are investigating CB and not the McCanns

[kizzy]

You suspected wrong. I have a rational explanation for everything you think is compelling evidence..the dogs... inconsistent statements... everything.
That's why the police are investigating CB and not the McCanns

Everything you don't know if they are still investigating him or if they have hit that break wall which would no surprise IMO.

Then that would only leave he mccs.