Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[Eleanor]

A photograph wouldn't really be evidence of death, unless it showed injuries incompatible with life

A Sleeping Child or A Dead Child.  Difficult to tell the difference.  But what would have been the time of clock?

[jassi]

A Sleeping Child or A Dead Child.  Difficult to tell the difference. But what would have been the time of clock?

Do you mean camera clock ?  Might never have been set, like mine, or set wrongly like the McCann one

[kizzy]

the Dogs....LOL....i think you need to have another think.

the alerts actually rule out CB if they are genuine

CB, in my opinion, should never have been ruled in

All they have as they call it is clues - seems they have run out of clues or haven't got one.

Maddie dragged through the media again how many more times till someone wakes up and smells the coffee.

[Eleanor]

Do you mean camera clock ?  Might never have been set, like mine, or set wrongly like the McCann one

If there is a photo of Madeleine on this man's Camera then the time wouldn't matter all that much.

I have already told you that I have no thoughts on the involvement of Brueckner, not even to the extent of what Wolters has had to say.  I have only ever wanted to see Evidence, or better still Proof.

I am tired of arguing about what is evidence and thoroughly fed up with anyone trying to implicate The McCanns who logistically cannot have done that of which they have been accused.  Presuming that some of you actually understand Logistics.  Or even half decent English.  Let alone Portuguese or German, or the legal system of either.

[Eleanor]

CB, in my opinion, should never have been ruled in

All they have as they call it is clues - seems they have run out of clues or haven't got one.

Maddie dragged through the media again how many more times till someone wakes up and smells the coffee.

Christian Brueckner should never have been ruled in?

A raging Convicted Child Abuser and Rapist?  Okay.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Christian Brueckner should never have been ruled in?

A raging Convicted Child Abuser and Rapist?  Okay.

Not to mention serial burglar of holiday apartments.

[faithlilly]

If there is a photo of Madeleine on this man's Camera then the time wouldn't matter all that much.

I have already told you that I have no thoughts on the involvement of Brueckner, not even to the extent of what Wolters has had to say.  I have only ever wanted to see Evidence, or better still Proof.

I am tired of arguing about what is evidence and thoroughly fed up with anyone trying to implicate The McCanns who logistically cannot have done that of which they have been accused.  Presuming that some of you actually understand Logistics.  Or even half decent English.  Let alone Portuguese or German, or the legal system of either.

Logistically the parents absolutely could have done it. In my opinion over-reliance on their timeline is the problem.

[Eleanor]

Logistically the parents absolutely could have done it. Over-reliance on their timeline is the problem.

Absolute nonsense.  You actually believe that they dumped Madeleine's body in a bin?  And then went out to dinner?

You must be as daft as Amaral.

[Myster]

If there is a photo of Madeleine on this man's Camera then the time wouldn't matter all that much.

I have already told you that I have no thoughts on the involvement of Brueckner, not even to the extent of what Wolters has had to say.  I have only ever wanted to see Evidence, or better still Proof.

I am tired of arguing about what is evidence and thoroughly fed up with anyone trying to implicate The McCanns who logistically cannot have done that of which they have been accused.  Presuming that some of you actually understand Logistics.  Or even half decent English.  Let alone Portuguese or German, or the legal system of either.

If incriminating photos were found on the removeable SD cards of Brueckner's camera(s), information (which would include camera make, focal lengths, aperture & time values, and also crucial dates when they were taken) known as EXIF data is easily displayed by right clicking on any saved photo file, then on the Properties tab, if using Windows OS for example.  The attached photograph was taken on a camera which doesn't have a user date-stamping facility; nevertheless, the date and time when it was taken is still available as EXIF data stored on its SD card.  So it's possible Brueckner's photos could be shown to have been taken anytime in the days shortly after the disappearance of MM (unless he was crafty enough and had the foresight to set the camera so that this data wouldn't be recorded).


[attachment deleted by admin]

[faithlilly]

Absolute nonsense.  You actually believe that they dumped Madeleine's body in a bin?  And then went out to dinner?

You must be as daft as Amaral.

No I think it was possible that Gerry checked at 9.30 and found Madeleine dead. Matt had only ever checked on the McCann children by listening at the shutters. Why would he enter the apartment without being asked...and, conveniently not see Madeleine ? I think Gerry did that check.

[jassi]

If incriminating photos were found on the removeable SD cards of Brueckner's camera(s), information (which would include camera make, focal lengths, aperture & time values, and also crucial dates when they were taken) known as EXIF data is easily displayed by right clicking on any saved photo file, then on the Properties tab, if using Windows OS for example.  The attached photograph was taken on a camera which doesn't have a user date-stamping facility; nevertheless, the date and time when it was taken is still available as EXIF data stored on its SD card.  So it's possible Brueckner's photos could be shown to have been taken anytime in the days shortly after the disappearance of MM (unless he was crafty enough and had the foresight to set the camera so that this data wouldn't be recorded).

As far as I'm aware, the time & date will only be relevant if it has been set in the first place, otherwise it will refer back to the factory settings.

[Mr Gray]

If incriminating photos were found on the removeable SD cards of Brueckner's camera(s), information (which would include camera make, focal lengths, aperture & time values, and also crucial dates when they were taken) known as EXIF data is easily displayed by right clicking on any saved photo file, then on the Properties tab, if using Windows OS for example.  The attached photograph was taken on a camera which doesn't have a user date-stamping facility; nevertheless, the date and time when it was taken is still available as EXIF data stored on its SD card.  So it's possible Brueckner's photos could be shown to have been taken anytime in the days shortly after the disappearance of MM (unless he was crafty enough and had the foresight to set the camera so that this data wouldn't be recorded).

that sounds sensible.....one of the few posts taht have today

[Eleanor]

As far as I'm aware, the time & date will only be relevant if it has been set in the first place, otherwise it will refer back to the factory settings.

Any photo of Madeleine on his camera would be enough.

[jassi]

Any photo of Madeleine on his camera would be enough.

Except that it could have been downloaded from the internet as were the videos

[Mr Gray]

If incriminating photos were found on the removeable SD cards of Brueckner's camera(s), information (which would include camera make, focal lengths, aperture & time values, and also crucial dates when they were taken) known as EXIF data is easily displayed by right clicking on any saved photo file, then on the Properties tab, if using Windows OS for example.  The attached photograph was taken on a camera which doesn't have a user date-stamping facility; nevertheless, the date and time when it was taken is still available as EXIF data stored on its SD card.  So it's possible Brueckner's photos could be shown to have been taken anytime in the days shortly after the disappearance of MM (unless he was crafty enough and had the foresight to set the camera so that this data wouldn't be recorded).

there could be other photos on the same memory card taken with the same camera taht could also provide evidence