Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 357981 times)

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2115 on: October 27, 2020, 08:46:47 PM »
Second statement made on the tenth...do you have a link to so called mistake

‘  Despite what he said in his previous statements, he states now and with certainty, that he left with KATE by the rear door which he consequently closed but did not lock given that that is only possible from the inside’
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2116 on: October 27, 2020, 08:57:26 PM »
‘  Despite what he said in his previous statements, he states now and with certainty, that he left with KATE by the rear door which he consequently closed but did not lock given that that is only possible from the inside’

Those aren't Gerry's words they are the translators

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2117 on: October 27, 2020, 09:08:25 PM »
Why have you shifted the discussion to something else?  We were talking about his position in the road, about which you have suggested he was wrong, and stubbornly refused to accept it.

The other two witnesses testified that the men were talking on the block 5 side of the road. In my opinion they were right and Gerry was wrong. The ex-detective said it didn't matter where they were standing, but it seemed to matter to Gerry.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2118 on: October 27, 2020, 09:10:22 PM »
Those aren't Gerry's words they are the translators

Which he signed as a correct record of his testimony.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2119 on: October 27, 2020, 09:12:41 PM »
Which he signed as a correct record of his testimony.
Which he couldn't read and had no idea what it said..and we don't know if the translator read it back correctly

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2120 on: October 27, 2020, 09:13:43 PM »
Those aren't Gerry's words they are the translators
Oh no, not this again!
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray


Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2122 on: October 27, 2020, 09:15:37 PM »
The other two witnesses testified that the men were talking on the block 5 side of the road. In my opinion they were right and Gerry was wrong. The ex-detective said it didn't matter where they were standing, but it seemed to matter to Gerry.
So what?  Really?  Tell me why this matters so much.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2123 on: October 27, 2020, 09:20:30 PM »
Which he couldn't read and had no idea what it said..and we don't know if the translator read it back correctly

When you’re in a hole...stop digging.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2124 on: October 27, 2020, 09:27:30 PM »
When you’re in a hole...stop digging.

It's strange isn't it? Some people are taken at their word, like Wolters, while others aren't even when there's evidence upholding what they said.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2125 on: October 27, 2020, 09:28:57 PM »
When you’re in a hole...stop digging.
I'm not really bothered...it's absolutely impossible that the translations were 100% accurate...we just don't know how many mistakes there were

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2126 on: October 27, 2020, 09:32:03 PM »
It's strange isn't it? Some people are taken at their word, like Wolters, while others aren't even when there's evidence upholding what they said.

Wolters speaks English or we have his actual spoken words

We don't have Gerry's actual spoken words so nothing can be verified...best not to go  over the same points again...

The statements cannot be proven to be accurate...there is evidence they are not
« Last Edit: October 27, 2020, 09:42:06 PM by Davel »

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2127 on: October 27, 2020, 09:36:51 PM »
When you’re in a hole...stop digging.
I'm surprised you haven't come up in Robs back garden

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2128 on: October 27, 2020, 10:05:37 PM »
It's strange isn't it? Some people are taken at their word, like Wolters, while others aren't even when there's evidence upholding what they said.
Are you saying that sceptics take the McCanns and their friends at their words? 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2129 on: October 27, 2020, 10:13:24 PM »
I'm not really bothered...it's absolutely impossible that the translations were 100% accurate...we just don't know how many mistakes there were

For someone who’s ‘not really bothered’ you spend a relentless amount of time being’ not really bothered’. In fact you’re so ‘ not really bothered ‘  you’ve deliberately hidden your online status just to prove it.

Genius.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?