Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[G-Unit]

I have no doubt they have a large follwing.  So do Q Anon.  I would rather not watch those fellas just before bedtime, it might give me nightmares.  They are pandering to the lowest common denominator audience IMO and they've obviously succeeded in impressing it.  Well done them.

I don't know what you mean by 'they are pandering to the lowest common denominator audience'? Perhaps you could explain why you formed that opinion?

[Vertigo Swirl]

I don't know what you mean by 'they are pandering to the lowest common denominator audience'? Perhaps you could explain why you formed that opinion?

As you regularly refuse to answer any of my questions I am under no obligation to answer any of yours.

[G-Unit]

I opt for the evidence and most certainly would never allow myself to be deceived by belief in a botched unfinished investigation.

Makes me wonder a bit about those who prove inability to think for themselves and place their reliance on the perpetration and perpetrators of error and falsehood.

WOW!!! yet another link to an instruction video to enable opinion to be further cemented firmly in the past from which the rest of the world moved on from so long, long ago.

Are your comments related to the podcast? There was no 'belief in a botched unfinished investigation' being demonstrated in it imo.

What was demonstrated was how difficult it has always been for some people to understand and accept the parent's
stories and behaviours.

There's been a huge effort to move things on in my opinion. Hoards of people have assured us that in their opinions the parents are innocent and the child was abducted. Operation Grange was set up nine years ago to investigate an abduction.

What no-one has ever done, however, is offer any evidence at all which proves there was an abduction and/or that the parents couldn't be involved. Unless and until that happens those uncertainties will remain, even after all the years which have gone by imo.

[Eleanor]

Are your comments related to the podcast? There was no 'belief in a botched unfinished investigation' being demonstrated in it imo.

What was demonstrated was how difficult it has always been for some people to understand and accept the parent's
stories and behaviours.

There's been a huge effort to move things on in my opinion. Hoards of people have assured us that in their opinions the parents are innocent and the child was abducted. Operation Grange was set up nine years ago to investigate an abduction.

What no-one has ever done, however, is offer any evidence at all which proves there was an abduction and/or that the parents couldn't be involved. Unless and until that happens those uncertainties will remain, even after all the years which have gone by imo.

How very sad.

[G-Unit]

As you regularly refuse to answer any of my questions I am under no obligation to answer any of yours.

Fair enough, I'll form my own opinion then; which is that you are denigrating something you made no attempt to
watch simply because you think you don't agree with the points you think it raises.

[barrier]

How very sad.

True life often can be.

[Brietta]

Are your comments related to the podcast? There was no 'belief in a botched unfinished investigation' being demonstrated in it imo.

What was demonstrated was how difficult it has always been for some people to understand and accept the parent's
stories and behaviours.

There's been a huge effort to move things on in my opinion. Hoards of people have assured us that in their opinions the parents are innocent and the child was abducted. Operation Grange was set up nine years ago to investigate an abduction.

What no-one has ever done, however, is offer any evidence at all which proves there was an abduction and/or that the parents couldn't be involved. Unless and until that happens those uncertainties will remain, even after all the years which have gone by imo.

Why would anyone willingly allow their intelligence to be insulted and corrupted by subscribing to videos and podcasts produced to permeate one opinionated aspect of a complex situation as the producer dictates and continue to think they have thought it all through for themselves?

[Brietta]

True life often can be.

The hounding of the McCanns most certainly is ~ in my opinion.

[G-Unit]

Why would anyone willingly allow their intelligence to be insulted and corrupted by subscribing to videos and podcasts produced to permeate one opinionated aspect of a complex situation as the producer dictates and continue to think they have thought it all through for themselves?

Many videos have been made, including 'Madeleine was Here', which, as Michael Wright said, had a specific purpose;
it "wasn't just to say that Madeleine should be looked for and she was alive. Channel 4 didn't conclude so. The point was to challenge the thesis of the book." In my opinion therefore that documentary was made to present a particular theory about the case as opposed to the contents of TTOTL.

The video we're discussing reached no firm conclusions and promoted no theories. It was just a good example of how difficult some people find it to put aside the questions they are left with after watching and listening to the parents.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Fair enough, I'll form my own opinion then; which is that you are denigrating something you made no attempt to
watch simply because you think you don't agree with the points you think it raises.

think what you like, it matters not a jot.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Many videos have been made, including 'Madeleine was Here', which, as Michael Wright said, had a specific purpose;
it "wasn't just to say that Madeleine should be looked for and she was alive. Channel 4 didn't conclude so. The point was to challenge the thesis of the book." In my opinion therefore that documentary was made to present a particular theory about the case as opposed to the contents of TTOTL.

The video we're discussing reached no firm conclusions and promoted no theories. It was just a good example of how difficult some people find it to put aside the questions they are left with after watching and listening to the parents.

Whst eas the point of the video then?  Just 90 minutes of two people bitching about how they find the McCanns odd?  How very valuable I’m sure.

[Robittybob1]

Whst eas the point of the video then?  Just 90 minutes of two people bitching about how they find the McCanns odd?  How very valuable I’m sure.

Maybe but do they raise any issues worthy of discussion?  You tell me. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Maybe but do they raise any issues worthy of discussion?  You tell me.

None seems to have been raised on here so far that I can see...

[Brietta]

Many videos have been made, including 'Madeleine was Here', which, as Michael Wright said, had a specific purpose;
it "wasn't just to say that Madeleine should be looked for and she was alive. Channel 4 didn't conclude so. The point was to challenge the thesis of the book." In my opinion therefore that documentary was made to present a particular theory about the case as opposed to the contents of TTOTL.

The video we're discussing reached no firm conclusions and promoted no theories. It was just a good example of how difficult some people find it to put aside the questions they are left with after watching and listening to the parents.

Cite please.

[G-Unit]

Cite please.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2335.0