Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[Vertigo Swirl]

I remember how impressed you were by the intellectual weight of Kate McCanns use of the word. 

Second time of asking - cite please.

[kizzy]

I don't think HCW is promulgating propaganda, I think he is trying to solve some serious crimes.  I am not lapping up anything he says, but I do believe he is sincere in his intentions and I do believe him when he says he has good reasons for coming to the conclusions he has.  I will reserve judgement on whether or not he was right to come to those conclusions if and when I find out upon what he is basing those opinions. 

I apologise to Butch and Weedy for any offence caused.

Nice of you -  but I doubt they have no interest whatsoever in what you have to say.

Unlike your interest in them imo

[kizzy]

There aren't many podcasts by people claiming the world isn't run by lizards or that the moon landings weren't faked either, I wouldn't read too much into that though.

Well we're not discussing moon landings/lizards are we -  its a thread about circumstantial evidence

[kizzy]

How does that differ from what I said? I think my description was closer to the spirit of what was said, minus the liberal use of the F-word which always adds intellectual weight to any opinion I find.

Does that include gmcc on the bus?

[Brietta]

First of all you stated "I know CALPOL is not a sedative ... these presenters apparently believe it is". As I demonstrated in my reply, nothing the presenters said suggested that they believed any such thing. Why you chose to misrepresent what they said I can't imagine.

As far as I'm concerned my opinion of the theory is irrelevant to the discussion.

How does one misrepresent a misrepresentation?  In accord with the archiving report, I have always thought Amaral's theories irrelevant ~ must say I find it intriguing you say the same.

[kizzy]

How does one misrepresent a misrepresentation?  In accord with the archiving report, I have always thought Amaral's theories irrelevant ~ must say I find it intriguing you say the same.

 I have always thought Amaral's theories irrelevant.

Well, I suppose it doesn't really matter what your opinion is - you weren't there.

GA was and paid to investigate and have theories. That others higher than him also thought.

It seems still to this day his theory that Maddie wasn't abducted still stands.

[Brietta]

 I have always thought Amaral's theories irrelevant.

Well, I suppose it doesn't really matter what your opinion is - you weren't there.

GA was and paid to investigate and have theories. That others higher than him also thought.

It seems still to this day his theory that Maddie wasn't abducted still stands.

If Amaral's case was as good as that can you explain why the Judicial Police and the Portuguese prosecutors of the time discarded it and why present day investigators are pursuing stranger abduction?

[Robittybob1]

??????????????

You might have missed that bit. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Nice of you -  but I doubt they have no interest whatsoever in what you have to say.

Unlike your interest in them imo

You might want to consider how you phrased that. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Does that include gmcc on the bus?

Was Gerry giving a podcast to express his opinion on an unsolved mystery, to be viewed by followers of his youtube channel?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Well we're not discussing moon landings/lizards are we -  its a thread about circumstantial evidence

No, you were pointing out the apparent lack of podcasts supporting the parents didn’t dunnit theory as if this was in some way significant of something.

[G-Unit]

How does one misrepresent a misrepresentation?  In accord with the archiving report, I have always thought Amaral's theories irrelevant ~ must say I find it intriguing you say the same.

I don't think it's so very complicated. You suggested that the presenters had an opinion which they didn't express.

Amaral's theories? I thought you mentioned "theory" singular, and it was my opinion which I said was irrelevant, not his "theories".

[Vertigo Swirl]

I remember how impressed you were by the intellectual weight of Kate McCanns use of the word. 

Cite please - third time of asking.

[G-Unit]

Cite please - third time of asking.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11103.msg563160#msg563160

[Vertigo Swirl]

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11103.msg563160#msg563160

Pathetic.  Your cite fails to demonstrate that I was impressed by Kate’s “intellectual weight” using the F- word, what it does demonstrate is my empathetic understanding of why she would be so exasperated by the moronic question she was being asked and what I would have done in similar stressful and distressing circumstances.  However, I don’t think swearing your way through a podcast about a serious matter such as a case of a missing child lends the programme or its presenters any credibility, do you?