Brueckner V McCann's

[barrier]

What definitive and specific piece of evidence which is in the public domain allows one previous suspect/s to be any more innocent than the now new suspect?

Page 70
...(cf. Jónatas Machado, Freedom of Expression - Constitutional Dimensions, op. cit. pp. 566-7)

And let not be said, too, that the appellants were cleared by the order of filing the criminal proceedings.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Nothing.  Therefore Robert Murat is no more innocent that Christian Bruckner.  Sorted. 

[barrier]

Nothing.  Therefore Robert Murat is no more innocent that Christian Bruckner.  Sorted.

So you agree that the new suspect it pure fantasy.

[kizzy]

Seems he is going to be the scapegoat after all. as predicted.

is lawyer Friedrich Fulscher insists the prosecutor is wrong and Christian B isn't the man who abducted Madeleine, though he hasn't been shown the evidence against him.

In his spacious office, 2km from the prison, Mr Fulscher said: "I don't know any more after three months because I can't look in the prosecutor's files. He still hasn't told us anything. It isn't fair for him to keep accusing Christian B of killing the girl without telling us the evidence he has.

"There is a legal principle, that both sides have to have the same weapons. It's time for the prosecutor to show his cards, because he is prejudging my client in public without giving him the chance to go into action.

[jassi]

Time will tell if the Germans have it right when they charge him and put him before a court.
Until then it's just not worth bothering about.  IMO

[Vertigo Swirl]

So you agree that the new suspect it pure fantasy.

How do you infer that from what I wrote?  Clearly the new suspect exists unless you are saying he is some composite creation devised by HCW to fool the world?

[barrier]

Seems he is going to be the scapegoat after all. as predicted.

is lawyer Friedrich Fulscher insists the prosecutor is wrong and Christian B isn't the man who abducted Madeleine, though he hasn't been shown the evidence against him.

In his spacious office, 2km from the prison, Mr Fulscher said: "I don't know any more after three months because I can't look in the prosecutor's files. He still hasn't told us anything. It isn't fair for him to keep accusing Christian B of killing the girl without telling us the evidence he has.

"There is a legal principle, that both sides have to have the same weapons. It's time for the prosecutor to show his cards, because he is prejudging my client in public without giving him the chance to go into action.

A awful lot in the beginning was done through the media.But my question is what definitive evidence in the public domain that renders one suspect more innocent/ guilty than the other.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Time will tell if the Germans have it right when they charge him and put him before a court.
Until then it's just not worth bothering about.  IMO

Quite wise, but it seems some sceptics are quite aerated about the latest developments and wish to convince us that it's all a farce / a conspiracy (delete as applicable) by opening threads like this one.

[barrier]

How do you infer that from what I wrote?  Clearly the new suspect exists unless you are saying he is some composite creation devised by HCW to fool the world?

The McCanns existed as suspects previously,the SC ruled that let it be not said,they were cleared,so what definitive evidence in the public domain renders the new suspect any more culpable?

[kizzy]

Time will tell if the Germans have it right when they charge him and put him before a court.
Until then it's just not worth bothering about.  IMO

Spot on Jassi at the moment it all just seems to be Bluff.

[Vertigo Swirl]

A awful lot in the beginning was done through the media.But my question is what definitive evidence in the public domain that renders one suspect more innocent/ guilty than the other.

First of all define "suspects" as they currently stand.

[Mr Gray]

What definitive and specific piece of evidence which is in the public domain allows one previous suspect/s to be any more innocent than the now new suspect?

Page 70
...(cf. Jónatas Machado, Freedom of Expression - Constitutional Dimensions, op. cit. pp. 566-7)

And let not be said, too, that the appellants were cleared by the order of filing the criminal proceedings.

No ones been cleared... There's lots of facts that make one suspect more likely  than another.. Tjetes a fair bit that makes CB likely

[barrier]

No ones been cleared... There's lots of facts that make one suspect more likely  than another.. Tjetes a fair bit that makes CB likely

Go on then,list them and how it makes him more culpable.

[Mr Gray]

Go on then,list them and how it makes him more culpable.

I can't be bothered as you and other sceptics are so biased you won't accept  the truth... Imo... We will know in a month or two

[barrier]

First of all define "suspects" as they currently stand.

There is a suspect,we know that, what is in the public domain that allows him to be more culpable than the McCann's who were not cleared of any involvement.