Kate McCann's unanswered questions.

[jassi]

The fact that Brückner would be charged under German law. So, no limitation for the murder as suggested by them.

There's no limitation for murder under British Law either, so that doesn't seem a valid reason. IMO

[Anthro]

Redwood went to a lot of trouble to convince people in my opinion. The man was photographed in similar clothing and even the pyjamas his child allegedly wore were photographed. Would he have put that effort in if he was unsure? Maybe, if he wanted to highlight the man seen later, but it suggests to me that they were getting nowhere with Tannerman and thought it was worth changing their focus.

The same is applicable to the current investigation.

[Holly Goodhead]

Based on the fact the specific time of Madeleine's disappearance was published by Portuguese TV for the first time, I think it does. Sandra F has done a lot of good research behind the scenes & spoken directly with Wolters.
It suggests the abductor was already inside the apartment during GM's check, something some of us have suspected for a long time.

SF is a primarily a TV presenter not a heavyweight investigative journalist. 

Remember this:

https://youtu.be/j2WMtvITFz8

She will go with whatever way the wind blows.

[Anthro]

There's no limitation for murder under British Law either, so that doesn't seem a valid reason. IMO

Brückner is a German citizen. The prosecutor will try him within the limitations as prescribed in his own country.

[Anthro]

SF is a primarily a TV presenter not a heavyweight investigative journalist. 

Remember this:

https://youtu.be/j2WMtvITFz8

She will go with whatever way the wind blows.

You are underestimating Sandra’s journalistic investigative position. She herself is on record discussing how Amaral selectively leaked information. She is on the ground, so to speak, and holistically analysing what is at the core of the case and residents’ firsthand experiences, and beyond re. Madeleine’s disappearance.

[faithlilly]

Again, Davel has explained that Wolters has communicated what they have on Brückner. Operation Grange do not have that intelligence, hence treating it as a missing person case.

Davel is patently wrong.

[faithlilly]

I do believe Jane Tanner.  She had no reason to lie.

So do SY and they have explained her sighting.

[faithlilly]

You are underestimating Sandra’s journalistic investigative position. She herself is on record discussing how Amaral selectively leaked information. She is on the ground, so to speak, and holistically analysing what is at the core of the case and residents’ firsthand experiences, and beyond re. Madeleine’s disappearance.

Seems she only found out she had been lied to many months after the files were published and long after her journalistic contemporaries had published chapter and verse. Doesn’t sound much of a journalist to me.

[Eleanor]

So do SY and they have explained her sighting.

You think?

[Brietta]

So do SY and they have explained her sighting.

In your opinion;  in mine they have done no such thing.

[faithlilly]

In your opinion;  in mine they have done no such thing.

I think the rest of the public who watched Crimewatch would disagree and that’s the main thing. Redwood’s claim wasn’t aimed at those with entrenched views.

[Brietta]

I think the rest of the public who watched Crimewatch would disagree and that’s the main thing. Redwood’s claim wasn’t aimed at those with entrenched views.

Then it is about time that the rest of the public developed a better understanding and comprehension of the English language.

[faithlilly]

Then it is about time that the rest of the public developed a better understanding and comprehension of the English language.

If Redwood was still trying to identify Tannerman it does seem a strange way of doing it, telling the public that he had already ‘ almost certainly’ been identified and they had been able because of this to move the timeline forward. Those policemen and their devious ways eh !

[Eleanor]

If Redwood was still trying to identify Tannerman it does seem a strange way of doing it, telling the public that he had already ‘ almost certainly’ been identified and they had been able because of this to move the timeline forward. Those policemen and their devious ways eh !

Perhaps Redwood should have found out the direction in which Dr. Totman should have been walking.

[sadie]

So IYO he went in through the window, then was warned Gerry was coming so he had to close the window and shutters and scamper off out of the front  door? Wasn't he lucky that Gerry didn't go to enter through the front door as he originally testified.

He couldn't have gone far, however, if, as some believe, Jane Tanner saw him with his black hair. If it was him, he raised the shutters, opened the window and climbed back in almost immediately after Gerry left. His accomplice must have thought that was fine, even though Gerry was still close by.

Well if his accomplice was on the balcony opposite as seems likely (superb viewing point and cigarette stubs) and was looking out, s/he would have found it impossible to see Gerry and Jez cos they were beyond his vision.  The balcony is set back with the main block 6 building wall on the Rua Dr FGM side jutting out hiding most of the view in a southerly direction.  This wall blocked off the spot where Gerry and Jez chatted.  The watcher couldn't see them, and as they had a sleeping child s/he wouldn't have heard their hushed talking either.

Please note:  You have to enlarge GEarth to its maximum, draw lines understanding perspective, and study it very closely to see how the view from the recessed balcony is cut off by the jutting out wall of block 6.  Gerry and Jez in the kerb and road would be totally out of sight.

As far as his accomplice was concerned, Gerry had gone back to the restaurant and it was time to let the abductor know and go out to the little car park opposite the Tapas reception to pick up the getaway vehicle.  The abduction would have taken less than two minutes, imo

All the above is theory, but it all fits perfectly