Will 2021 Bring About A Resolution?

[barrier]

What unanswered questions?

The meaning of life.

[Eleanor]

If you enjoy being damned with faint praise whilst the sensibleness of the rest of "your side" is called into question then I suppose it was just fine.

I shan't answer that because it wouldn't be productive for either side.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I shan't answer that because it wouldn't be productive for either side.

Jassi made a personal comment which was also a dig at an unspecified number of people on this forum.  I don't think her comment was that productive either, in fact I think it was designed to engender the very confrontation she alleges she now shuns.  IMO.

[faithlilly]

Not really, but you are one of the relatively sensible ones on the 'other' side 

Without a doubt.

[faithlilly]

Well exactly. One of my resolutions this year was to avoid meaningless dialogue with confrontational posters.
Worked fine so far   

The best course IMO. Once you discard the weeds it’s so much easier to see the flowers.

[Vertigo Swirl]

This just descending into another sly insult fest. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Perhaps we should all put each other on ignore, that way we need never have our precious opinions challenged.

[G-Unit]

Perhaps we should all put each other on ignore, that way we need never have our precious opinions challenged.

There are opinions and there are facts. The facts are that the evidence given by the holiday group was contradictory and unclear. Many explanations have been offered, but they are mostly opinions so they don't constitute a challenge.

[Mr Gray]

There are opinions and there are facts. The facts are that the evidence given by the holiday group was contradictory and unclear. Many explanations have been offered, but they are mostly opinions so they don't constitute a challenge.

Of course they constitute a challenge. There is absolutely no way of knowing if those statements are accurate.. That is an absolute fact. There is evidence they are not

[Vertigo Swirl]

There are opinions and there are facts. The facts are that the evidence given by the holiday group was contradictory and unclear. Many explanations have been offered, but they are mostly opinions so they don't constitute a challenge.

The facts are that to a greater or lesser extent EVERYONE’S statements were contradictory and unclear.  It still constitutes evidence.  Now, which “undoubted evidence” points to the McCanns involvement?  Still waiting for you to give a clear, uncontradictory answer to this question.

[G-Unit]

Of course they constitute a challenge. There is absolutely no way of knowing if those statements are accurate.. That is an absolute fact. There is evidence they are not

There is no evidence that the statements are inaccurate imo. 

[Mr Gray]

There is no evidence that the statements are inaccurate imo.

Kstes statement in her book is evidence.... That's not opinion.. Its fact

[G-Unit]

Kstes statement in her book is evidence.... That's not opinion.. Its fact

It's a fact that Kate McCann claimed that as one of the reasons for making statements to detectives from Control Risks Group on 13th May. It's also a fact that she claims that these new statements were given to the PJ. She also claims that they were so keen to pass them on that they didn't check these new statements for accuracy, and despite them being given in English they also contained inaccuracies. It seems that no-one managed to accurately record her story in Mrs McCann's opinion.

Kate McCann's actual words are that  'parts of the statements'... 'might have been lost in translation'. That sounds like an opinion to me, and as it's not possible to compare the new statements with the originals it's not possible to decide whether her opinion was justified or not.

[Eleanor]

There is no evidence that the statements are inaccurate imo.

When do you think that The Trial of The McCanns will happen?

[Vertigo Swirl]

The facts are that to a greater or lesser extent EVERYONE’S statements were contradictory and unclear.  It still constitutes evidence.  Now, which “undoubted evidence” points to the McCanns involvement?  Still waiting for you to give a clear, uncontradictory answer to this question.

I can fully understand why I will never get a straight answer to this question....