Of course if the DNA turns out to be his his team will have a whole raft of excuses why it was there so he can’t lose by having it tested.
Firstly let us swiftly apply reality to this = Crock of s**t.
Let us NOT deflect from what is NOT happening which is nothing legally, there is nothing new here, what there is, is an attempt to salvage something from all the previous manipulated hype.
Here is context and reality once more - 2021 and many people were contacted around the disposal of items from storage in relation to this case, to be returned to owner or permission to destroy. The enablers got wind of this and it was morphed into "Illegal destruction of evidence"
What was NEVER up for destruction/disposal were certain samples/tests retained in labs - Said it then that one would be extremely surprised if this were the case. What the manipulator/enablers now apply is that they stopped this - Have a word.
There is storage units for masses of items obtained in multiple crimes, they just get fuller and fuller until action is taken to clear out and make room for more. It takes little to imagine the storage for this case alone, 1000's of items including a massive replica wall. There is a slithering of truth in people who dealt with this case, the retainment of many items, officers now heading into retirement, many tasks needing done before they set sail into the sunset of those golden years ------ That is context and reality, there is no rushing to destroy anything because of some stupid TV show. There has never been anything found untoward in this case that has ever merited legal action where any evidence is concerned.
SF's, "15 sperm deposits" to SL and IB, 15 "unsatisfactory samples" to that predictive wording now of "not tested" - Gullible? How does it go? 'I am a little sperm head, I am defunct but my fellow swimmer survived, we speak for ourselves, no tests required to determine what we are?' - Of course the samples were bloody tested - Have a word!
Where is the slithering of truth and manipulation here? - I know, this is the first time we have actually seen this on a list as opposed to the reports we have around the forensics/testing. We can say this is new because the list is new to us, it is NOT new/different to what is already in possession. Dam, when we have Lean saying, she had still not matched the correct samples to reports, she is certainly not going to be saying I can match those on the list to anything, are they now? Best just to apply new - Yawn.
Skip the hype, the fallacy and go straight to what is important here - Not new, no appeals to be had, nothing hidden or undisclosed to anyone, it is the same tests/samples that these enablers have been spinning out for years. - Back to the WAP again. Here is a defunct sperm head, we can apply one solo male to this until we know who's it is. Here is another defunct sperm head, we can apply another male to this, we can't say it is the same male unless there is the ability to obtain full profiles - and on it goes --------
Here I go again, I know - When we apply LM having direct source of an agreement made in front of him around certain forensics in this case, we then have to apply absolute fact that he knows every single detail of that agreement. When we simply state "another source" without naming source, it allows manipulators and enablers to blank the exact reason for that agreement. And when someone scrapes and strives to blank the exact reason, then we apply the why to this? - It allows for what is still happening in the present day, continuous groundhog day -
VS is correct - There is nothing to lose for someone who is already in full possession of every detail of that agreement, the further clarification of "nothing found that could not be innocently explained away" never changes - Tactics to keep the same focus and support, manipulation and support by deception ----
Two accepted donors, any trace transferral/diffusion from original source of SK and of course LM. You are told there is absolutely nothing, that is zero of LM to do with Jodi Jones at all in any reports. There is, of course there is, let us take one small example here, the visit by Jodi to Mitchells home/ his bedroom the Saturday before her death. We can apply two things here? One that many samples were found pertaining to Jodi Jones, or that LM scrubbed that bedroom, a massive overhaul and clean up took place, the latter did not happen, did it now? - Continuously spun a yarn to place focus on just two things, the only two things discussed, introduced before that agreement took place, the bra strap and the trouser in a bag ------------- The rest blanked on repeat.
In brief, nothing illegal, no shady actions at all. Every single thing held on to for 18yrs were most should have been returned/disposed off many years ago. Certain test/samples that were never up for any disposal at all, no one put a halt to any of this, you don't halt what was not taken place. They got wind of items being disposed/returned by the very people this was taken place with. There was no illegal destruction of evidence.
That tiny excerpt put out, manipulated around about destroying items, we can ask again 'Were items belonging to a certain person disposed of without consulting with the owner first?' A civil matter around personal belongings and not evidence.
Again, take that knife pouch, a production at trial. A case solved, spent its time, the item reverts back to a possession, a belonging and no longer evidence - The Jones family, such bad people, imagine NOT wanting "bloody clothing" back - Some very odd people out there, that's for sure!
