Ron M
1 month ago
Scott Forbes you make the point of the horrific injuries that Jodi suffered
The 4 people in the circle and one is dead
This is just my thoughts those other
3 committed and or witness a murder
How did those 3 behave after the murder
I am lead to believe that they had no medical problems caused by that day or new medical issues that would explain something is wrong
This is leading me to believe that those 3 are dangerous with sign's of psychopathy
Their medical file's will prove this
If you Ken what I mean
Ron M
21 hours ago
After great amount of discussion
Those guys that I have spoke to
Have decided to go after those involved in Jodi's murder there are 5 men who were over that V at some point Not including Luke as he is not guilty and was set up
God have mercy on their soul🙏
#33 | Scott Forbes : I Can Prove Luke Mitchell Is Innocent
11,195 views · 1 month ago...more
Premeditated Patter
Has the bloke who runs that YouTube channel reported this and if not why not?
Clearly it is Ron who has some series problems going on upstairs, and no surprise in the slightest that he supports the other one who is the same.
When I read that on You Tube - It spelt the following, an up the ante on the constant abuse from Mr Forbes with his playground behaviour, as with yourself, every poster is applied as being one of the 'others' not to be listened to. I believe I have been JH, someone in the police, but above all someone who appears to be downing buckets of vodka by the minute, whilst on 'mushrooms?' The usual - Cannot prove what is being said around the actual evidence to be wrong, so Mr Forbes simply attacks constantly. He has absolutely no intellectual skills to discuss and debate.
So, this threat of sorts, a 'wee' message from the four corners of 'Glesgi' perhaps. To try and silence the discussion. - The reversal of course of 'There will be those who oppose the truth' to those who are lying constantly being exposed. A poster on the Blue Forum stopped for a while for he had been threatened, such is the level of thugs involved in Mitchell's pleas of innocence. As of course was JH herself. The main support and not of course those who are intelligent enough to have their doubts around realistic areas. Who do not jump from 'guilty by media' to 'Innocence by the same means' to 'Joining in with the smear-campaign'
Dim and dimmer still. I put up what came directly from the Mitchell's, and he applies it as being "drivel" I put up further information, which as you know, some was 'gleamed' from Ms Lean, and he applies "Where are you getting this -----------?" from. For a male who claims to have studied case papers forever, he knows virtually nothing of the actual case itself, of LM V HMA. But alas and is clear, Mr Forbes role is not around LM V HMA, is it?
Mr Forbes takes the bog standard, someone said something as being the only truth, that the actual words were spoken (that is the truth part), and transforms these into something that belongs in a very bad sci fi story!
The knife in the skip, class is it not? - That the police did nothing, just send in a forensic team to rake through a skip looking for the tip. It did not form part of the trial is the astonishment of the male who had the skip? That will be because it was NOT evidence, yielding nothing of any value. But alas and sadly, he has fallen into that fantasy of the police doing nothing with what was not "vital evidence" - The, they only had lies for Luke saga, because they take at face value those promoting a convicted killer as innocent, without being able to prove this at all.
It is a threat still the same - Incited by the disinformation, manipulation and blatant lies of course. But should anything happen to these innocent people - There will be no responsibility taken on board from those promoting the lies--------------
