"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

Part 18g Sandra Lean’s Fabricated PhD Should Be Revoked!
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/31/quite-a-hall-tale-part-18f%ef%b8%8f/

[Nicholas]

Part 18g Sandra Lean’s Fabricated PhD Should Be Revoked!
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/31/quite-a-hall-tale-part-18f%ef%b8%8f/

The psychopathic mass murderer, who Sandra Lean carried a photograph of during a protest in Edinburgh in December 2008 was represented by Alan Dershowitz (OJ) and Michael Mansfield (Simon Hall) on appeal

August 2001
‘Mr Mansfield, well known for his work on behalf of the Birmingham Six and the Guildford Four and more recently for representing Jill Dando's killer Barry George, is one of eight lawyers working on the appeal.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2001/aug/09/lockerbie.rebeccaallison

[Nicholas]

Excerpt from Sandra Lean’s ‘thesis’ page 186 under the heading ‘Expert and ‘scientific’ evidence’

‘When the defence team is expected to cross-examine evidence introduced by prosecution experts, then, very often, that evidence has already been selected or influenced by investigating officers, and precise instructions given to the experts as to what to test/analyse/ comment upon. For example, one accused person explained that the scene had been cleared by the time the expert witness who was eventually used in court was asked to give a report.64
But, as the accused person in this case points out, this was not the only expert report provided during the investigation:

“They get an answer, and the initial answer is...probably accidental, then they got another one...who was a little bit higher up the chain, and he says the same, so they go and get another one... all of a sudden, these two fires have come into play, but he‟s still saying one started as a result of the other, so it‟s still accidental, so they go away and get another one - they just keep getting another one an another one and another one until they get the answer they want. And once they‟ve got the answer they want, then that‟s the expert – everyone else was talking rubbish.‟
(accused, acquitted at trial)

64: The case involved the death of a child in a house fire, and the police officer who showed the expert around told him that a “paper taper‟ had been found. The expert then produced his report on the basis of this information. Fortunately, for this accused person, the defence team noticed this anomaly, and had an expert report prepared, including photographs, which had not been available to the other expert, proving that the so-called taper had, in fact, been an envelope lying flat on the surface of a printer.

Funding for so many reports for a defence team would almost certainly not be approved, highlighting the inequality inherent in the funding process, an inequality which is not apparent to wrongly accused individuals and their families, or to the wider public. The accused in the above case was acquitted on a “not proven‟ verdict, and one of the criticisms later levelled (by those who believe the not proven verdict is not indicative of innocence) was that the defence solicitors “did not even call their own experts.‟

Sandra Lean’s former boyfriend 👆🏽un-convicted baby killer, sexual deviant and predator Billy Middleton

Un-convicted baby killer and scammer Billy Middleton referred to in Part 18g
👇
https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/31/quite-a-hall-tale-part-18f%EF%B8%8F/

[Nicholas]

Excerpt from Sandra Lean’s ‘thesis’ beginning from page 258

”The discovery that not only their own legal teams, but appeal court judges and other authorities, may be making deals behind the scenes, was a source of deep distress and resentment for some families. In some cases, it was a trade off of evidential issues, whereas in others, agreements regarding procedural issues were taken with the full knowledge of the defence team, but without reference to the convicted person or their family members;

“As far as I know, there was an agreement that, should it be found that the trial was not legitimate, you know, that the evidence was all wrong, he would get a re-trial, not his freedom. So that was the agreement and that was what happened. They sent him back to prison to wait for his re-trial... what I didn‟t realise was the amount of collusion going on between the authorities and his legal team ...there was this multi-agency organisation that wanted to put *** under their eye if he was released... his legal team had obviously been liaising with the police...‟
(family member, accused convicted, acquitted at re-trial after serving 8 years)

Although this person was cleared at re-trial, an arrangement had been made behind the scenes to place him on probation, and under surveillance (even though, legally, on acquittal, he had the right to be presumed innocent), and his own legal team had arranged for him to be taken away to a bail hostel on his release, without informing either the client or his family that they were doing so.


👆🏽Fantasist and innocence fraudster Michelle Diskin Bates

“even though, legally, on acquittal, he had the right to be presumed innocent” ~ Sandra Lean

No he didn’t!

Jill Dando’s killer never proved his actual, factual innocence following his first trial - ‘legally’ he failed to undermine all the evidence which led to his conviction

“Although this person was cleared at re-trial” ~ Sandra Lean

Wrong again!

He wasn’t ‘cleared at re-trial’ he was found not guilty!

Murderer, serial stalker and sexual predator Barry George still posed/poses a dangerous risk to women, hence the need for MAPPA restrictions

[Nicholas]

Excerpt from Sandra Lean’s ‘thesis’ page 186 under the heading ‘Expert and ‘scientific’ evidence’

‘“They get an answer, and the initial answer is...probably accidental, then they got another one...who was a little bit higher up the chain, and he says the same, so they go and get another one... all of a sudden, these two fires have come into play, but he‟s still saying one started as a result of the other, so it‟s still accidental, so they go away and get another one - they just keep getting another one an another one and another one until they get the answer they want. And once they‟ve got the answer they want, then that‟s the expert – everyone else was talking rubbish.‟
(accused, acquitted at trial)

Not in this case it wasn’t !

[Nicholas]

Excerpt from Sandra Lean’s ‘thesis’ page 186 under the heading ‘Expert and ‘scientific’ evidence’

‘When the defence team is expected to cross-examine evidence introduced by prosecution experts, then, very often, that evidence has already been selected or influenced by investigating officers, and precise instructions given to the experts as to what to test/analyse/ comment upon. For example, one accused person explained that the scene had been cleared by the time the expert witness who was eventually used in court was asked to give a report.64
But, as the accused person in this case points out, this was not the only expert report provided during the investigation:

“They get an answer, and the initial answer is...probably accidental, then they got another one...who was a little bit higher up the chain, and he says the same, so they go and get another one... all of a sudden, these two fires have come into play, but he‟s still saying one started as a result of the other, so it‟s still accidental, so they go away and get another one - they just keep getting another one an another one and another one until they get the answer they want. And once they‟ve got the answer they want, then that‟s the expert – everyone else was talking rubbish.‟
(accused, acquitted at trial)

64: The case involved the death of a child in a house fire, and the police officer who showed the expert around told him that a “paper taper‟ had been found. The expert then produced his report on the basis of this information. Fortunately, for this accused person, the defence team noticed this anomaly, and had an expert report prepared, including photographs, which had not been available to the other expert, proving that the so-called taper had, in fact, been an envelope lying flat on the surface of a printer.

Funding for so many reports for a defence team would almost certainly not be approved, highlighting the inequality inherent in the funding process, an inequality which is not apparent to wrongly accused individuals and their families, or to the wider public. The accused in the above case was acquitted on a “not proven‟ verdict, and one of the criticisms later levelled (by those who believe the not proven verdict is not indicative of innocence) was that the defence solicitors “did not even call their own experts.‟

Sandra Lean’s former boyfriend 👆🏽un-convicted baby killer, sexual deviant and predator Billy Middleton

Un-convicted baby killer and scammer Billy Middleton referred to in Part 18g
👇
https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/31/quite-a-hall-tale-part-18f%EF%B8%8F/

Excerpt from Page 367 of Sandra Lean’s ‘thesis’

“Arrangements will be made to provide links (telephone numbers, addresses, web addresses) to support organisations and mechanisms for prisoners and families who participate in the study (for example, Miscarriages of Justice Organisation (MOJO,) Wrongly Accused Persons Organisation, Innocent, etc), in the event that participation causes distress.

 

[Nicholas]

Excerpt from page 370 of Sandra Lean’s ‘thesis’

“1. General Responsibilities

vi) correct any misrepresentations

 

[Nicholas]

Part 18g Sandra Lean’s Fabricated PhD Should Be Revoked!
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/31/quite-a-hall-tale-part-18f%ef%b8%8f/

UPDATED 👆🏽

[Nicholas]

Part 18g Sandra Lean’s Fabricated PhD Should Be Revoked!
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/31/quite-a-hall-tale-part-18f%ef%b8%8f/

Part 18h Continued Sandra Lean’s Fabricated PhD Should Be Revoked With Immediate Effect!
👇
https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/12/15/continued-sandra-leans-fabricated-phd-should-be-revoked-with-immediate-effect-part-18h%ef%b8%8f/

[Nicholas]

Un-convicted baby killer and scammer Billy Middleton referred to in Part 18g
👇
https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/31/quite-a-hall-tale-part-18f%EF%B8%8F/

How many aliases did spammer Billy Middleton have 

Road2Justice = Billy Middleton

http://road2justice10.blogspot.co.uk/2010/11/todays-walk-free-in-support-of-danny.html

https://www.legalcube.org/wronglyaccusedperson.org.uk

Legalcube.org ?

[Parky41]

FF really tops the bill with the most user names, he even has conversations between himself playing different parts - Shakes one head!

[Nicholas]

Part 18h Continued Sandra Lean’s Fabricated PhD Should Be Revoked With Immediate Effect!
👇
https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/12/15/continued-sandra-leans-fabricated-phd-should-be-revoked-with-immediate-effect-part-18h%ef%b8%8f/

Part 18i Partners In Crime: Abusers Sandra Lean & Billy Middleton & The WAP Org
👇
https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/12/15/further-sandra-leans-fabricated-phd-should-be-revoked-part-18i%ef%b8%8f/

[Nicholas]

The psychopathic mass murderer, who Sandra Lean carried a photograph of during a protest in Edinburgh in December 2008 was represented by Alan Dershowitz (OJ) and Michael Mansfield (Simon Hall) on appeal

August 2001

“Dershowitz wrote in The Scotsman newspaper on Wednesday that he had become concerned that the legal standards of proof of Al-Megrahi's guilt had not been met.

He said he also feared "the wrong man may well have been convicted of the crime and the real mass murderer may not have been charged".

Mansfield -- a high profile British lawyer -- is also helping the defence team. Earlier this year he defended the man convicted of killing TV presented Jill Dando and previously he led the appeal that led to the Birmingham Six -- who were wrongly convicted of a 1970s IRA bombing on the UK mainland -- being freed.

But Susan Cohen of New Jersey, whose daughter was one of those killed in the bombing, accused the lawyers of spreading propaganda on behalf of Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi.

"As a victim of terrorism, I feel personally betrayed because Dershowitz passes himself off as the hero of victims of terrorism. He is just the opposite," Reuters news agency quoted her as saying.
https://edition.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/europe/08/08/lockerbie.lawyers/index.html

[Nicholas]

Excerpt from Sandra Lean’s ‘thesis’ beginning from page 258

”The discovery that not only their own legal teams, but appeal court judges and other authorities, may be making deals behind the scenes, was a source of deep distress and resentment for some families. In some cases, it was a trade off of evidential issues, whereas in others, agreements regarding procedural issues were taken with the full knowledge of the defence team, but without reference to the convicted person or their family members;

“As far as I know, there was an agreement that, should it be found that the trial was not legitimate, you know, that the evidence was all wrong, he would get a re-trial, not his freedom. So that was the agreement and that was what happened. They sent him back to prison to wait for his re-trial... what I didn‟t realise was the amount of collusion going on between the authorities and his legal team ...there was this multi-agency organisation that wanted to put *** under their eye if he was released... his legal team had obviously been liaising with the police...‟
(family member, accused convicted, acquitted at re-trial after serving 8 years)

Although this person was cleared at re-trial, an arrangement had been made behind the scenes to place him on probation, and under surveillance (even though, legally, on acquittal, he had the right to be presumed innocent), and his own legal team had arranged for him to be taken away to a bail hostel on his release, without informing either the client or his family that they were doing so.


👆🏽Fantasist and innocence fraudster Michelle Diskin Bates

Excerpt from page 137 of Sandra Lean’s ‘thesis’

“The practise of getting close relatives to sign statements very early in the proceedings, which would render those relatives “prosecution witnesses,‟ was widespread. Only one interviewee (family member) in this study refused to give a statement to police in these circumstances; she had come to the attention of police relatively late in proceedings, and had taken legal advice. She says:

“They asked me to give a statement that would help ***, they called it a character statement, and it turned out it would have been a witness statement, but I didn‟t know that until I spoke to ***‟s legal advisor, and he told me not to do it... what they had called it was not what it would have been... and they told me that it was to help ***- they were very clear on that – “You would like to help your brother, wouldn‟t you?‟
(Family member, accused convicted, conviction overturned on appeal)

[Nicholas]

UPDATED Part 18g Sandra Lean’s Fabricated PhD Should Be Revoked!
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/31/quite-a-hall-tale-part-18f%ef%b8%8f/