Author Topic: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean  (Read 878845 times)

0 Members and 65 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Kenmair

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #1485 on: February 10, 2023, 06:45:57 PM »
James English….90% against, now comments are 90% for Luke’s innocence.

If your claim was ever true it certainly doesn’t seem to be now.

James English, really? His podcasts are full of ex-gangsters, pornstars and Tommy Robinson. The same James English who was convicted of assaulting a woman and spitting in her face just 5 years ago interviewing a Danderhall fantasy lawyer and ex-con. I would have expected it to be higher than 90% given the borderline criminal audience it attracts.
« Last Edit: February 10, 2023, 06:49:17 PM by KenMore »

Offline Rusty

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #1486 on: February 10, 2023, 07:14:08 PM »
James English, really?

His content is just full of people blowing their own trumpet. But when you dig a little deeper (something his audience won't do) on these characters, most are just jumping on the social media grift to make some coin. Exaggerating about crimes or punch-up's that may or may not have happened years ago. There is obviously an audience that love taking that kind of stuff at face value, that are quite happy to donate their fivers to these grifters.

Offline Rusty

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #1487 on: February 10, 2023, 07:20:56 PM »
And can anyone shed some light on the injunction said to be taken out by Shane Mitchell against his mother Corinne Mitchell?

Interesting. It probably explains a lot about their (non) relationship. Since her youngest was convicted.

Has Corrine ever seen her gran children?

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #1488 on: February 10, 2023, 08:48:16 PM »
Sandra Lean
Push bikes featured with an almost ridiculous amount of significance in the early investigation, and it was literally years before I discovered why.


If push bikes did feature “with an almost ridiculous amount of significance in the early investigation” why didn’t con woman Sandra Lean mention the killers yellow framed push bike in her first discredited book No Smoke?

https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/02/08/copy-of-chapter-from-sandra-leans-1st-discredited-smoke-mirrors-book-promoting-the-innocence-fraud-phenomenon-of-actually-factually-guilty-killer-luke-mitchell/

What exactly did John F and Gordon D say to the police about killer Luke Mitchell’s yellow framed push bike?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #1489 on: February 10, 2023, 08:56:44 PM »
Sandra Lean
Well, it turns out that JuJ told police Luke had told her on the phone, just before 11pm, that he was at the Newbattle entrance to the path and was coming up on his bike.


Did killer Luke Mitchell also go to and from school on his yellow framed bike that day?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #1490 on: February 10, 2023, 08:59:49 PM »
Sandra Lean
Push bikes featured with an almost ridiculous amount of significance in the early investigation

So what did all these witnesses say about killer Luke Mitchell and his push bikes and what did he tell police happened to his yellow framed push bike?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #1491 on: February 10, 2023, 09:23:48 PM »
So what did all these witnesses say about killer Luke Mitchell and his push bikes and what did he tell police happened to his yellow framed push bike?

Sandra Lean
JuJ told the police Luke would come to the house for Jodi either on foot or on his bike.


Obviously killer Luke Mitchell wasn’t using his bike with the flat tyre apparently hanging up in the garage
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #1492 on: February 10, 2023, 09:26:52 PM »
Sandra Lean
JuJ told the police Luke would come to the house for Jodi either on foot or on his bike.


Obviously killer Luke Mitchell wasn’t using his bike with the flat tyre apparently hanging up in the garage

What did [Name removed] tell police about killer Luke Mitchell swapping his bikes?

Sandra Lean
An account attributed to [Name removed] spoke of Luke swapping one bike for another.

Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #1493 on: February 10, 2023, 09:28:45 PM »
So what did all these witnesses say about killer Luke Mitchell and his push bikes and what did he tell police happened to his yellow framed push bike?

Sandra Lean
GD threw in the "yellow framed bike" in his account of his and JFs movements on the path that day.


What did killer Luke Mitchell say to police when he was asked about his bikes?
« Last Edit: February 10, 2023, 09:30:57 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #1494 on: February 10, 2023, 09:29:19 PM »
James English, really? His podcasts are full of ex-gangsters, pornstars and Tommy Robinson. The same James English who was convicted of assaulting a woman and spitting in her face just 5 years ago interviewing a Danderhall fantasy lawyer and ex-con. I would have expected it to be higher than 90% given the borderline criminal audience it attracts.

This is the same borderline criminal audience 90% of who believed that Luke was guilty when James English interviewed Dr Lean.

So when did the stupidity kick in, when they believed he was guilty or innocent ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #1495 on: February 10, 2023, 09:38:55 PM »
Sandra Lean
Well, it turns out that JuJ told police Luke had told her on the phone… that he was at the Newbattle entrance to the path and was coming up on his bike.


If killer Luke Mitchell left Newbattle Abbey crescent on his bike it would have taken him less time to have met up with [Name removed] than if he’d have walked to meet her

« Last Edit: February 10, 2023, 09:41:03 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #1496 on: February 10, 2023, 09:44:20 PM »
Un-convicted baby killer Billy Middleton stated here https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XWmPZqy2wKg

“The cyclist in this case (LK) states that he heard a noise not at the V but slightly further on, nearer to the Easthouses end of Roan's Dyke Path. It is suggested that it was in fact Jodi being strangled behind the V break in the wall that he heard. However this animation of relative speeds show that Jodi, leaving at around 5pm as first claimed, could not have been anywhere near that point when the cyclist past.

Further, as can be seen in this clip, for the cyclist to have avoided seeing Jodi, she could not have proceeded down Roan's Dyke path but must have instead either gone through the break in the wall at the Easthouses end, down Lady Path, or into the School grounds. Quite simply the cyclist would have seen her and the mystery man (assuming the 2 independent sightings shortly after 5 were Jodi being followed by a stocky man) otherwise.

If LK had been any later getting to the Newbattle end of the path, he would have encountered the moped duo GD & JoF. Any earlier, he would have been emerging from the path as Jodi & the mystery man were entering and could
not have avoided seeing them.


 *&^^&

Grifter Sandra Lean claimed Leonard Kelly went to the police ‘immediately’

Did she mean he went to the police on the 1st of July 2003 to tell them what he’d heard when cycling up the path?

Sandra Lean
He came in from the Newbattle end at, he reckoned, between 5 and 10 past 5
His account was that he heard a noise behind the wall and stopped to listen.


Re 👆🏽Leonard Kelly
« Last Edit: February 10, 2023, 09:47:35 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #1497 on: February 10, 2023, 09:50:02 PM »
Sandra Lean
GD threw in the "yellow framed bike" in his account of his and JFs movements on the path that day.


What did killer Luke Mitchell say to police when he was asked about his bikes?

Sandra Lean
GD gave an account of a "yellow framed push bike" against the school railings at the junction of the paths


What exactly did Gordon D say to the police about this bike?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #1498 on: February 10, 2023, 09:52:33 PM »
Sandra Lean
So essentially, taking all of the other witness statements into account


Toxic abuser Sandra Lean hasn’t told the people she’s choosing to dupe about the contents of all the other witness statements for them to be able to also take them into account

Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #1499 on: February 10, 2023, 09:54:30 PM »
Sandra Lean
There are a number of ways the killer could have escaped without coming out onto either  of the paths, but this was never even a police consideration - in order to shoe-horn everything into their chosen theory, the initial claims that the killer would be heavily bloodstained, and appeals for anyone who'd witnessed someone disposing of their usual clothing, changing appearance, etc were dropped by trial


Suspect the police already knew killer Luke Mitchell wasn’t ‘heavily bloodstained’ after he’d committed his murder but by appealing “for anyone who’d witnessed someone disposing of their usual clothing, changing appearance, etc” the police could demonstrate they’d carried out a thorough investigation

Killers (and their enablers) are hardly likely to come forward and tell the police they’ve disposed of their clothing

 *&^^&
« Last Edit: February 10, 2023, 10:02:17 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation