"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

Why have innocence fraud pushers Sandra Lean and Scott Forbes targeted Jane Hamilton but not mentioned Nichola Stow?

Corinne Mitchell 19th September 2010
Sorry to burst your bubble Wullie! Its Nicola Stow.......MODERATED...She has a history of writing... MODERATED..about Luke. Luke has just been on the 'phone to me as his guards laughingly gave him a copy as they know Luke has nothing to do with this individual.

Why has Corinne Mitchell never mentioned Jane Hamilton?

Corinne Mitchell 27th September 2010
Well! for 7 years I have complained to the Press Complaints Commission about the Daily Record and other tabloids about the lies and rubbish they have printed about Luke so to~day I was pleasantly surprised and shocked to read the article they have put in.
Apart from using the name "killer" in the headline the article was, on the whole good.......Not at all expected from The Daily Record
Could things be a changing??? [/color]

Corinne Mitchell 2nd October 2010
Surprisingly good for work by Amy Devine. For years she has put out utter rubbish about my family so it is good she can actually do an article without any sensationalism

[Nicholas]

Psychopathic killer Luke Mitchell is a grave risk to women in particular

[Nicholas]

Mitchell team links Greens to Jodi killing Excerpts by Bob Smyth - 13th February 2012

”MURDERER Luke Mitchell is to renew attempts to clear his name by blaming the Da Vinci Code rapist for killing teenager Jodi Jones.

His solicitors are putting together a case which will allege convicted rapist Robert Greens was responsible, it has been reported.

Mitchell was jailed in 2005 for the schoolgirl murder which made headlines across the UK.

It is understood the dossier will be put in front of the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission, citing the fact Greens was in the area at the time and the modus operandi was similar to his offence.

The reports author, Sandra Lean, who is helping Mitchells defence team, said: When I realised Greens had apparently been regularly in the vicinity at the time, it sent a shiver through my spine. Its hard to believe no-one has joined the dots since he became so notorious.

Mrs Lean, who holds a paralegal qualification in criminal law, is
helping Mitchell's defence team prepare the SCCRC dossier.

Yesterday she told the Scottish Mail on Sunday: "When I realised
Greens had apparently been regularly in the vicinity at the time it
sent a shiver through me.

"He comes from Mayfield, near the homes of Luke and Jodi in Newbattle
and Easthouses. It's hard to believe no one has joined the dots since
he became so notorious.

"He had a criminal record for violence before the rape and had been in
and out of detention since he was a teenager.

"My information is that at the time of Jodi's murder Greens was
visiting his sister regularly on his way home from work.

"Jodi's murder was said to have been around 5.15pm - the same time of
day Greens struck.

"Greens' sister lived in Newtongrange.

"It's only a short walk from Roan's Dyke, the secluded path where
Jodi's body was found lying behind a wall.

"The modus operandi of Greens strikes me as similar. He saw his victim
walking in a wooded area and had a knife when he attacked her."

Greens  was jailed for 10 years in 2006 after attacking a 19-year-old
Dutch student who was in Scotland for a gap year.

He pounced on her as she was walking near Rosslyn Chapel in
Midlothian, which featured in bestselling book The Da Vinci Code.

After asking if she was a virgin, Greens dragged her along the ground,
threatened her with a knife, raped her and beat her so badly it looked
as though she'd been in a car crash.

The 34-year-old was freed from prison last month after serving less
than six years.

Yesterday Mrs Lean said: "We have to ask if Greens crossed the
police's radar at the time Jodi was killed.

"I don't know if he has an alibi for Jodi's murder.

"But I know the police have never accepted there could be other
possible suspects and have never been proactive in looking for any."

 

Sandra Lean 13th February 2012
There is no "scattergun" approach - my position has been consistent for 8 years - the "investigation" failed to properly investigate potential other suspects and crucial information, leaving these questions unanswered for all these years. 


 

[Nicholas]

Mitchell team links Greens to Jodi killing Excerpts by Bob Smyth - 13th February 2012

”MURDERER Luke Mitchell is to renew attempts to clear his name by blaming the Da Vinci Code rapist for killing teenager Jodi Jones.

His solicitors are putting together a case which will allege convicted rapist Robert Greens was responsible, it has been reported.

Mitchell was jailed in 2005 for the schoolgirl murder which made headlines across the UK.

It is understood the dossier will be put in front of the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission, citing the fact Greens was in the area at the time and the modus operandi was similar to his offence.

The reports author, Sandra Lean, who is helping Mitchells defence team, said: When I realised Greens had apparently been regularly in the vicinity at the time, it sent a shiver through my spine. Its hard to believe no-one has joined the dots since he became so notorious.

Mrs Lean, who holds a paralegal qualification in criminal law, is
helping Mitchell's defence team prepare the SCCRC dossier.

Yesterday she told the Scottish Mail on Sunday: "When I realised
Greens had apparently been regularly in the vicinity at the time it
sent a shiver through me.

"He comes from Mayfield, near the homes of Luke and Jodi in Newbattle
and Easthouses. It's hard to believe no one has joined the dots since
he became so notorious.

"He had a criminal record for violence before the rape and had been in
and out of detention since he was a teenager.

"My information is that at the time of Jodi's murder Greens was
visiting his sister regularly on his way home from work.

"Jodi's murder was said to have been around 5.15pm - the same time of
day Greens struck.

Why did Innocence fraud pusher Sandra Lean accept the TOD as being 5:15pm for Robert Greens but not for psychopathic, sadist killer Luke Mitchell?

[Nicholas]

Heather Brunt
I often look at my shepherd and think of Mia and how much Luke, a 14 year old  boy took his dog a torch to help and he's paid the toughest price, just for helping.
It's a strange feeling being so invested when I don't know him but I know right from wrong 👍

 

[Bullseye]

That trip to Kenmore

You stated it sounded like Jodi was onto Luke and Kimberly, what makes you think this? Did she know about the trip? Was there something in her diary, did she tell anyone her suspicions, did she act like someone who thought her bf was cheating on her when she left that evening? I’ve always wondered about motive but never seen any evidence of any as yet so be good to understand why you think she was onto him.

You also said Luke might have been jealous of the friend they met up with at lunch, what makes you think this?

[John]

Heather Brunt
I often look at my shepherd and think of Mia and how much Luke, a 14 year old  boy took his dog a torch to help and he's paid the toughest price, just for helping.
It's a strange feeling being so invested when I don't know him but I know right from wrong

 

Surreal for sure. She's so lucky it wasn't her daughter that Mitchell almost decapitated.

[Parky41]

You stated it sounded like Jodi was onto Luke and Kimberly, what makes you think this? Did she know about the trip? Was there something in her diary, did she tell anyone her suspicions, did she act like someone who thought her bf was cheating on her when she left that evening? I’ve always wondered about motive but never seen any evidence of any as yet so be good to understand why you think she was onto him.

You also said Luke might have been jealous of the friend they met up with at lunch, what makes you think this?

OK, firstly, Jodi Jones would have been fully aware of LM's planned holiday, he was not just going to say to her on the day he was going away. Did she know about KT from there, then every probability - LW first of all, friend of LM's for years would know his other girlfriends. Every chance LM would have told Jodi of relationships had. Therefore yes, a very high probability she knew of the girl and definitely knew that LM was going on holiday there.

Jodi had been on punishments for weeks, a tough time no doubt - Fully lifted that day, of course the girl was going to be upbeat about this being lifted. If she knew of the girl, the holiday, something troubling her, then having the opportunity to have this out with LM sooner than later, is also reason for lifting her mood. We are told the girl was of strong character, someone who would without doubt have pulled LM around this. As stated before, adoration to confrontation - A red rag to some natures?

[Parky41]

Surreal for sure. She's so lucky it wasn't her daughter that Mitchell almost decapitated.

Sure is surreal - Led up the proverbial path here. The dog had nothing, that is zero to do with LM going over that wall, a fact that has on repeat been proved beyond all doubt.

The fables - SL that the dog "may" have given off two false alerts before the V. Dani B and the dog did nothing before the V thus LM would know to go left. SD, I "think" the dog sniffed left when standing  up against the V.

The trio, first statement to testimony, and stationary at the V - LM some 60ft down to exactly 43ft and "parallel to" After going to the Gino spot because he had a "hunch" He was paving the way, making up the dog and where on that path. Goodness knows what  he had been doing for 22mins before meeting the others, or indeed what he had been doing since leaving the house with the dog some time after 10pm.

No evidence they say - No alibi, the ludicrous application of multiple doppelgangers being seen in Mitchell clothes. 90mins of waiting on a girl who "might" have been going to his. Wearing that coat with many others around him on the 13th of June 2003 to a 'gig' up town with Jodi, never seen again after the murder. The brown handled Skunting knife. DNA of absolutely no value, it could not be used as evidence, no forensic evidence at all pointing this murder elsewhere. Did not go home at 9pm, did not go home until 10pm. 6 mins of his actions to find that body (cough, fuelled with lies), 10-20 seconds to walk around 10steps and back behind that wall (fuelled with lies). Abnormal reactions at all times.

The fallacy, the constant lies. LM and he had walked up the path looking, the enablers and he raced up it. LM, met with other at top, he was lying. LM, they walked back down together, the enablers, it was AW, the Jones family who made him go back down, and on it goes, to avoid that clear special knowledge. 6 bloody minutes of special knowledge fuelled with lies from LM.

[Parky41]

Sure is surreal - Led up the proverbial path here. The dog had nothing, that is zero to do with LM going over that wall, a fact that has on repeat been proved beyond all doubt.

The fables - SL that the dog "may" have given off two false alerts before the V. Dani B and the dog did nothing before the V thus LM would know to go left. SD, I "think" the dog sniffed left when standing  up against the V.

The trio, first statement to testimony, and stationary at the V - LM some 60ft down to exactly 43ft and "parallel to" After going to the Gino spot because he had a "hunch" He was paving the way, making up the dog and where on that path. Goodness knows what  he had been doing for 22mins before meeting the others, or indeed what he had been doing since leaving the house with the dog some time after 10pm.

No evidence they say - No alibi, the ludicrous application of multiple doppelgangers being seen in Mitchell clothes. 90mins of waiting on a girl who "might" have been going to his. Wearing that coat with many others around him on the 13th of June 2003 to a 'gig' up town with Jodi, never seen again after the murder. The brown handled Skunting knife. DNA of absolutely no value, it could not be used as evidence, no forensic evidence at all pointing this murder elsewhere. Did not go home at 9pm, did not go home until 10pm. 6 mins of his actions to find that body (cough, fuelled with lies), 10-20 seconds to walk around 10steps and back behind that wall (fuelled with lies). Abnormal reactions at all times.

The fallacy, the constant lies. LM and he had walked up the path looking, the enablers and he raced up it. LM, met with other at top, he was lying. LM, they walked back down together, the enablers, it was AW, the Jones family who made him go back down, and on it goes, to avoid that clear special knowledge. 6 bloody minutes of special knowledge fuelled with lies from LM.

Initiated an actual physical search directly to the locus area, within the first 20mins and  he is physically at the locus. Meets with others and he instantly introduces the woodland beyond that wall, the actual locus. 6mins he has found his something. Told the police he had never been in there before, told them he had never seen those breaks in the wall before that night. Not a dam bit of honesty in any of it. The only person to hand an alibi over on a plate in the very first instance, rehearsed. A completely false account that was also proved beyond any doubt to have been made up. The ridiculous obtuse questions put in place, such as "who made the dinner, someone had to have made it?" - What dinner? SM sure as hell did not have any pies, chicken/steak burnt or otherwise. CM sure as hell did not either. And still nearly 20yrs on we wait to find out how she prepped her prawns! We know virtually nothing of the mountains of information/statements/evidence obtained from the Mitchells, it remains hidden unless it can be sourced on line - How many mobile phones and sim cards did the Jones family have? Relevant, not in the slightest! Their mobile phones and sim cards did NOT produce what came forward from LM, not his mother or brother.

[Bullseye]

OK, firstly, Jodi Jones would have been fully aware of LM's planned holiday, he was not just going to say to her on the day he was going away. Did she know about KT from there, then every probability - LW first of all, friend of LM's for years would know his other girlfriends. Every chance LM would have told Jodi of relationships had. Therefore yes, a very high probability she knew of the girl and definitely knew that LM was going on holiday there.

Jodi had been on punishments for weeks, a tough time no doubt - Fully lifted that day, of course the girl was going to be upbeat about this being lifted. If she knew of the girl, the holiday, something troubling her, then having the opportunity to have this out with LM sooner than later, is also reason for lifting her mood. We are told the girl was of strong character, someone who would without doubt have pulled LM around this. As stated before, adoration to confrontation - A red rag to some natures?

So you think she knew about his last relationship and the fact he was going on holiday there and his “ex” would be there might have caused an argument. I can totally see that happening, I’m sure if she knew she would definitely be worried about him meeting up with his ex. Does anyone know if she wrote about it in her diary or mentioned it to friends. I kept a diary at that age, that is definitely something she would put in there, unless she was worried Luke might read it. I use to use code with things I was worried my mum might read, was there anything like that in the diary?

[Nicholas]

Corinne Mitchell knew by the time she was sat next to her sadistic killer son Luke Mitchell in Dalkeith police station, whilst he was giving his 22 page written witness statement, that he’d killed Jodi Jones - and she became his accomplice.

[Nicholas]

Goodness knows what  he had been doing for 22mins before meeting the others, or indeed what he had been doing since leaving the house with the dog some time after 10pm.

And if it was Corinne Mitchell’s suggestion at this time for her killer son Luke Mitchell to go out and look for Jodi Jones, as he told the police in Dalkeith police station - she already had an idea he was behind her disappearance,

Corinne Mitchell knew of the assaults on those other girls - from age 11

[Nicholas]

Linzi Brown
Sorry for the long post but I have just listened to the "Through the wall: the case against Luke Mitchell" podcast with Nioami Channel.
Firstly, I'd like to point out that just because someone is breathing air and their heart is beating doesn't mean they are living! With that being said, when they eventually do put the correct person behind bars, and they will. That person needs to be charged with 2 counts of murder. Jodi's horrific murder was terrible but the person that did this also murdered a 14 year old boy the minute Luke found the body. Not only because he was convicted of the murder which is horrendous but because as a 14 year old boy he had to witness that scene and seeing someone he loved and cared for gone forevermore.
Secondly, as Luke says in the interview on the podcast, his whole life is gone, experiences he should have had were robbed from him. He'll never get the chance to do all the things we did as young adults and twenty somethings. He's had to watch people move on with their lives while he's living inside a prison both physically and mentally.
The police say they convicted him on behalf of the people, WE ARE THE PEOPLE and they sure as s*** didn't convict him on behalf of me!!
 Do better police Scotland!
Police Scotland don't want him to get an appeal because they like to make other people own their s**** but don't want to do that themselves!!!

 

[Nicholas]

Now Lean in the book has it, that Jodi could not have been known to be missing by 10.45pm,