"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

There are so many alleged incidents around LM threatening or harming girls with knives since aged 12 and bragging to friends how he fantasises about killing someone. Are they all untrue or just in it for the money. And why did he have such a knife at that age?

It's incredulous that you cannot accept reported facts yet wholeheartedly believe the speculation and theories of Lean and Forbes. In Forbes case, a drug addled ex-armed robber who regularly appears on podcasts chewing his lip and sniffing due to substance use. Perhaps not the most credible witness also given his previous attempts at fraud and extortion.

I wouldn’t be surprised to learn there were other knife incidents around sadistic killer Luke Mitchell that haven’t been reported on

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean is back to recording videos in her house - instead of that van

She claims at the beginning of the latest nonsense that sadistic killer Luke Mitchell ‘offered’ to go looking for Jodi Jones - several hours after he’s murdered her

 

Sandra Lean omits to mention the fact that the killer initially told police it was his mother Corinne Mitchell’s suggestion that he go out looking - which appears to have been all part of the attempted cover up in the early hours of the investigation

[Nicholas]

How many samples did the SCCRC test - what were the results - and what exactly did the SCCRC say about the dna ?

I wouldn't mind knowing the answers to those questions myself, Nicholas. The only thing I've read which mentions the SCCRC's tests and results pertaining to the DNA in this case was from an old Daily Mail article (link provided below). Interestingly, it states that, as well as LM's human rights being breached during several police interviews (the sccrc took the view that LM was treated as a suspect from July 1st 2003 and, as such, should've been allowed access to a lawyer at all times; and, just as significantly, they also took the view that the crown breached his human rights by allowing evidence to be led in court from 3 police interviews -- between July 1st 2003 and 14th August 2003 -- without a lawyer), they found 2 tiny, previously undiscovered samples (from -- likely -- semen and possibly other body fluids) on the top of Jodi's trousers NOT from LM. I always thought these previously undiscovered samples were from LM, so that is a bit of a concern (unless, of course, they were transferred innocently). Does anyone know who these samples were attributable to? Quite an important question.  As usual, tbe DNA in this case continues to confound and bewilder.

 https://www.pressreader.com/uk/the-scottish-mail-on-sunday/20140706/281801397063449

Without seeing the Scottish criminal cases review commissions (SCCRC) statement of reasons I wouldn’t pay much heed to what a journalist has written

Plus then it’s down to whoever’s interpretation has been included in the statement of reasons

It does seem obvious though that the SCCRC thought killer Luke Mitchell was guilty

[Nicholas]

Jacqueline Johnson
I've just sat and watched the latest podcast, I will certainly be taking your advice Sandra Lean and writing to question these new process which leave no paper trail. I've said before I never beleived Luke was guilty from the day he was found guilty, the lack of forensic evidence convinced me. I've never been influenced by the media as I know how dangerous they can be. The people of Scotland need to beleive in a justice system which is transparent and fair. We have seen none of this here. I beleive that there are many people out there who have not signed the petition who would be willing to now. I also agree we need to protest in numbers.Regardless of whether politicians want to get involved, they have too get involved. They most definitely need to listen to the people of Scotland.

Grifter Sandra Lean is no different to the ‘dangerous’ media

Does Jacqueline Johnson not realise the content of most of Sandra Leans first book was founded of the ‘dangerous’ media narratives

[Nicholas]

Jacqueline Johnson
I've just sat and watched the latest podcast, I will certainly be taking your advice Sandra Lean and writing to question these new process which leave no paper trail. I've said before I never beleived Luke was guilty from the day he was found guilty, the lack of forensic evidence convinced me. I've never been influenced by the media as I know how dangerous they can be. The people of Scotland need to beleive in a justice system which is transparent and fair. We have seen none of this here. I beleive that there are many people out there who have not signed the petition who would be willing to now. I also agree we need to protest in numbers.Regardless of whether politicians want to get involved, they have too get involved. They most definitely need to listen to the people of Scotland.

People will be wasting their time contacting any politician based on anything grifter Sandra Lean says about the case

The media reporters , who don’t carry out their due diligence, might write articles about the circumstantial dna samples but none of these stories will make an iota of difference to psychopathic killer Luke Mitchell’s convictions

[Nicholas]

Dani Justice
Ian N Fiona Mackenzie  just think of how much has been said and thrown at Luke and his family. A wee tosser saying nasty things is nothing says more about them saying stuff like that. Would he say that to Luke himself after he's found innocent in law forensics and public opinion? They think Luke is a wee 14 year old boy who they can bully but Luke is a man now and these comments are just that words and empty threats mean nothing for what is coming will topple the Scottish justice to its knees. Let the plebs say bad nasty things if that's what they want 😏 . First time in 20 years there her 100s now defending Luke and that is why these wee farts are annoyed haha.

 

‘

[Nicholas]

Heather
@Truth4Luke
Replying to
@InnocenceFraudW
 @SacredGeoInt
  and 2 others
Who killed himself, who raped an old lady, who married him.
Stephanie Hall
6:53 pm · 29 Mar 2023

Danielle Barclay
@danitoe
Replying to
@Truth4Luke
@InnocenceFraudW
  and 3 others
Heather do not even bother engaging with that thing ! I blocked ages ago! Waste of energy
6:55 pm · 29 Mar 2023

Heather
@Truth4Luke
Replying to
@danitoe
@InnocenceFraudW
  and 3 others
You're right, it's a nasty evil s..m of a woman
6:57 pm · 29 Mar 2023

Danielle Barclay
@danitoe
Replying to
@Truth4Luke
@InnocenceFraudW
  and 3 others
Continue educating those who will listen and have a proper conversation and discussion...no chance with the thing at all. X
7:00 pm · 29 Mar 2023
https://twitter.com/Truth4Luke/status/1641136451042570242

[Nicholas]

Heather
@Truth4Luke
A Must Watch 4 Updated info on how rotten 2 the core this whole investigation has been.
Semen on Jodi's bum,who does it belong too? I'd assume Steven Kelly as his sperm is on her tee.Why are all the men implicated not screaming 4 the samples to be tested https://youtu.be/d7ELDtUUcr4
3:24 pm · 30 Mar 2023
https://twitter.com/Truth4Luke/status/1641446260480811009

[Nicholas]

Cameron Russell
Cheers, watching it now. Surly it’s coming on top now. I know if my name was getting mentioned and I was innocent, I would be getting my side across. If Scott and Sandra are lying, surely they would get in trouble

Sandra Lean
Cameron Russell I'd have to have been one hell of a liar, as well, to have never slipped up once in 20 years!!!!

[Nicholas]

I wouldn't mind knowing the answers to those questions myself, Nicholas. The only thing I've read which mentions the SCCRC's tests and results pertaining to the DNA in this case was from an old Daily Mail article (link provided below). Interestingly, it states that, as well as LM's human rights being breached during several police interviews (the sccrc took the view that LM was treated as a suspect from July 1st 2003

During his 1st July 2003 killer Luke Mitchell had his mother Corinne Mitchell sat next to him

And there were times during this interview where he would ask his mother questions to aide his evidence

Like for example saying to Corinne “Shane wasn’t there was he”

Killer Luke Mitchell also told police during this first interview that he went out to look for Jodi on his mother's suggestion

And this appears to have occurred prior to receiving a text message from Judith Jones

Corinne Mitchell’s stated during her killer sons trail;

“I kept trying to phone him as he was late and in trouble”

All her telephone calls to her killer son were ignored

Then at 00:30hrs on the 1st of July 2003 killer Luke telephoned his mother allegedly saying to her;

“I can't talk, I have to go”

[Nicholas]

That misogynistic creep Roddy McLeod/Barrheadboy referring to Jodi Jones as ‘darlin’’ then making claim Janine Jones knowingly gave her sister a t-shirt with Stephen Kelly’s sperm on it to wear

 

And equally creepy Sandra Lean with yet more of her bs and attempting to dupe anyone who listens to her into thinking circumstantial dna will solve a solved crime

 

[Nicholas]

Interestingly, it states that, as well as LM's human rights being breached during several police interviews (the sccrc took the view that LM was treated as a suspect from July 1st 2003 and, as such, should've been allowed access to a lawyer at all times; and, just as significantly, they also took the view that the crown breached his human rights by allowing evidence to be led in court from 3 police interviews -- between July 1st 2003 and 14th August 2003

Psychopathic killer Luke Mitchell told the police numerous lies throughout his interviews and also made slip ups

Corine Mitchell should not have been allowed to sit in with her killer son’s 1st interview (on 1st July 2003) but the fact she did suggests the SCCRC may have also highlighted this fact in their statement of reasons

If the police really did think he was guilty on the 1st July 2003, they wouldn’t have allowed his mother to sit next to him whilst he gave his 22 pahe statement

Killer Luke Mitchell’s interviews weren’t videoed like psycho killer Aiden Fucci’s but I strongly suspect Corinne Mitchell’s intuition was telling her her son had committed murder, similar to Crystal Smith’s
👇
https://youtu.be/Rcv7rCZJlSA

There was a reason why Corinne Mitchell chose to lie about her timings and her pretended her killer son had cooked a make believe meal on the 30th June

[Kenmair]

That misogynistic creep Roddy McLeod/Barrheadboy referring to Jodi Jones as ‘darlin’’ then making claim Janine Jones knowingly gave her sister a t-shirt with Stephen Kelly’s sperm on it to wear

 

And equally creepy Sandra Lean with yet more of her bs and attempting to dupe anyone who listens to her into thinking circumstantial dna will solve a solved crime

 

Why do these creeps only go on pro-Mitchell podcasts? The hosts aren't even neutral but are backing them up - all of them. Forbes seems to have curtailed the drugs but still talks an equal amount of lies and nonsense.

I understand a protest coming up in a few weeks. Come along for your free sausage roll and bingo ticket.

[Nicholas]

Why do these creeps only go on pro-Mitchell podcasts? The hosts aren't even neutral but are backing them up - all of them.

Hypocrite Naomi Channell has done a podcast called “Charles Mansons ‘fan club’

UPDATED
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/01/30/through-the-wall-on-the-case-against-luke-mitchell-podcast-by-manipulative-liar-narcissistic-abuser-deluded-fantasist-innocence-fraud-pusher-naomi-channel/

[Nicholas]

Why do these creeps only go on pro-Mitchell podcasts? The hosts aren't even neutral but are backing them up - all of them.

Roddy McCleod, Sandra Lean and Scott Forbes gaslighting/double binds are on full display again in their latest video
👇
https://eleanorpayson.com/slipping-the-knot-of-the-double-message-double-bind-otherwise-known-as-gaslighting/