"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

Gary Peden
The fact that DB replaced him and she has done exactly the same yet seems to be allowed to do it without getting called out even by Tory or labour candidates/MSP it's truly truly unbelievable

Sandra Lean
It's the pi$$ing on our backs and telling us it's raining that infuriates me. They actually expect us to believe that Lady Wolffe didn't realise the case she'd been allocated involved her husband? A 9MILLION POUND claim, involving her husband and she somehow didn't realise???
The other thing you see in this article is one that came up again and again in Luke's case (and is still being pushed out every chance they get) - it's "normal procedure" - even when you can see, with your own eyes and brain, that what they are talking about is a departure from normal procedures
The whole lot of them are on very, very thin ice now. The public have seen behind the veil and they are not happy!

 

[Nicholas]

Why did Corinne Mitchell refer to David High as a ‘notorious liar’?

And what time did David High get home that night?

There’s no mention in the court judgement of killer Luke Mitchell going for a walk with David Tullock and walking past the Mitchell’s house on the way to the ‘Tarzan Swing’

Where was the ‘Tarzan swing’ located amd were the jury shown a photograph of a mao showing the location of the ‘Tarzan swing’?

David High lied

‘David and two other friends set out to walk to Mitchell's home but he called them and told them to go to Newbattle Abbey College instead.

Advocate Depute Alan Turnbull QC asks the teenager: 'Where did you go then?' David replies: 'We just stayed there.'

When asked what they were doing there, he says: 'Smoking cannabis.'

He also tells the court that he was surprised to see Mitchell on his own, without Jodi, and asked where she was.

David High is also asked if he knew if Mitchell was planning a holiday with another girl for the weekend after Jodi died.

He says Mitchell had not mentioned it to him and had not told him about having sex with the other girl.

He tells the court: 'I think he might have said something about that.'

He goes on to deny any knowledge of a girl called Kimberley who was described earlier in the trial as a Jodi lookalike.

Mr Turnbull asks: 'You didn't know that girl had been to stay at his house and he had been to stay with her?'

David says: 'No.' Mr Turnbull: 'She stayed in his room when she visited. He did not tell you he had sex with the girl?'


David High appears to have omitted to mention them walking past the Mitchell’s house and going to the Tarzan swing’

“He said: 'That night I got a phone call from David High, who was pals with Luke.

'We went up to meet him at the college at about 7pm and we just mucked about.

'We were smoking hash - Luke always brought it. He always seemed to have enough to go round.

'We went to sit in the bunker just next to the college and smoked cannabis there.

'Then we went for a walk to a Tarzan swing past Luke's house and we mucked about on that for a bit.

'At about 9pm, myself and one of the other lads went home.'
https://www.thefreelibrary.com/I+FEEL+SICK%3B+JODI+JONES%3A+THE+AFTERMATH+EXCLUSIVE%3A+Pal+reveals...-a0127512565

Did David High stay with killer Luke Mitchell?

[Nicholas]

David High lied

‘David and two other friends set out to walk to Mitchell's home but he called them and told them to go to Newbattle Abbey College instead.

Advocate Depute Alan Turnbull QC asks the teenager: 'Where did you go then?' David replies: 'We just stayed there.'

They didn’t just stay there though

They ‘smoked cannabis’ and then they all left Newbattle abbey college and they walked past killer Luke Mitchell’s house and went to the ‘Tarzan swing’ - according to David Tullock

David Tullock and one other lad appear to have headed home at 9pm

Did David High go back to killer Luke Mitchell’s house?

[Nicholas]

They didn’t just stay there though

They ‘smoked cannabis’ and then they all left Newbattle abbey college and they walked past killer Luke Mitchell’s house and went to the ‘Tarzan swing’ - according to David Tullock

David Tullock and one other lad appear to have headed home at 9pm

Did David High go back to killer Luke Mitchell’s house?

David Tullock appears to have been with another lad before he got a call from David High

“He said: 'That night I got a phone call from David High, who was pals with Luke.

'We went up to meet him at the college at about 7pm and we just mucked about.

'We were smoking hash - Luke always brought it. He always seemed to have enough to go round.

'We went to sit in the bunker just next to the college and smoked cannabis there.

'Then we went for a walk to a Tarzan swing past Luke's house and we mucked about on that for a bit.

'At about 9pm, myself and one of the other lads went home.'
https://www.thefreelibrary.com/I+FEEL+SICK%3B+JODI+JONES%3A+THE+AFTERMATH+EXCLUSIVE%3A+Pal+reveals...-a0127512565

Where did killer Luke Mitchell and David High go?

[Nicholas]

‘When Mr Turnbull asked him about the blade, the youth responded: "It was a folding one."

The witness identified a picture of a knife in court as "pretty like" the one Mr Mitchell allegedly had that day.

In a statement to the police, Mr High said the accused told him the knife was for protection after he asked him why he was carrying it.

He said that he would often get food during school lunch breaks for Mr Mitchell, whom he said would sometimes reward him with cannabis at the end of the week.

David High saw killer Luke Mitchell with his brown handled folding knife that night

Corrine Mitchell referred to David High as a ‘notorious little liar’ not a ‘notorious liar’
👇
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4066537.stm

UPDATED
👇

30th June 2003 TIMELINE Of 14, Almost 15 Year Old Scottish Killer Luke Mitchell’s Murder (Part 174)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/04/09/30th-june-2003-timeline-of-14-year-old-killer-luke-mitchells-murder-part-174/

[Nicholas]

David High saw killer Luke Mitchell with his brown handled folding knife that night


UPDATED
👇

30th June 2003 TIMELINE Of 14, Almost 15 Year Old Scottish Killer Luke Mitchell’s Murder (Part 174)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/04/09/30th-june-2003-timeline-of-14-year-old-killer-luke-mitchells-murder-part-174/

Did David High also see killer Luke Mitchell with his dog Mia that night?

Was David High in the killers garden when he was having another fire?

What time did David High tell the police he got home?

[Vertigo Swirl]

I’m afraid the bottom of the barrel was already scraped through by your good self before I even picked up a trowel.

Have you listened to yourself? Psychopathy is not easily diagnosed but you claim to have  achieved it with reference to a few media articles. Have you heard of the Goldberg rule?

Oh dear, I think you might be thinking of the Goldwater rule…?

[Nicholas]

Did David High also see killer Luke Mitchell with his dog Mia that night?

Was David High in the killers garden when he was having another fire?

What time did David High tell the police he got home?

Did the Mitchell’s next door neighbour Nicolas Frankland see killer Luke Mitchell alone at 22:00hrs walking in the street or did he tell the police he also saw another youth or a dog?

And would Nicholas Frankland have been able to see if killer Luke Mitchell had Mia the dog with him at 22:00hrs - from his viewpoint - sitting watching TV?

[Nicholas]

Has anyone read this book? 

I’ve read a couple of pages from IB yesterday/today

Why did grifter Sandra Lean not make it clear it was self published?

And who’s idea was it to put that bird between those scales

[Nicholas]

Page 2


“An imprint of Viva Angelina Publishing, Scotland“

What’s this 👆🏽

A play on Angeline aka Sandra Lean?

Angeline aka Sandra Lean mentioned here
👇

Sandra Lean: Where Did It Really All Begin & Why?- Part 18a
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/29/quite-a-hall-tale-part-18a%ef%b8%8f/

Here
👇

The Appeals To Credentials Fallacy & Innocence Fraud (Part 4)
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/21/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-4/

And here
👇

Killer Luke Mitchell: Innocence Fraud Enabler Sandra Lean (Part 40)
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/09/03/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-40/

[Nicholas]

I’ve read a couple of pages from IB yesterday/today

Why did grifter Sandra Lean not make it clear it was self published?

And who’s idea was it to put that bird between those scales

Excerpts from IB by con artist Sandra Lean
“It is the story of an ordinary mum”

?

 

“In June 2003, I was happily running my own business, a Natural Health Centre and had completed a long-term project renovating the old mining cottage that was home to me and my two girls. It was seven years since my marriage to the girls’ dad had ended and at last, life felt good again.
Then, right in the middle of this wondrous new phase of my life….” ~ Sandra Lean

According to a source of mine Sandra Lean’s eldest daughter Chelsie, aka ‘unicorn princess’ (Referred to at the beginning of 1st discredited book ‘No Smoke’), lived with her father Kenny from around the age of 8 years of age.

I accept my source could be incorrect on this but Sandra Lean told me directly (circa 2009/19) her and her eldest daughter did ‘not get on’ and ‘hadn’t spoken for years’

And didn’t the ‘natural health centre’ go down the swanee?

With regards to the ‘completed’ renovations of her ‘cottage’

 

The Peter Hill Rough Justice video suggests the ‘cottage’ renovations were NOT completed!

What year was that rough justice video filmed in?

“…wondrous new phase of my life”

 ?

Was this also the ‘phase’ when Sandra Lean was in a relationship with an alleged ‘psychopath’ called Simon (also referred to at the beginning of ‘No Smoke’)

How did Sandra Lean’s youngest daughter Ellie (also referred to in ‘No Smoke’) feel about her mums new ‘phase’ and the alleged ‘psychopath’ called Simon?

[Nicholas]

Excerpts from IB by con artist Sandra Lean
“It is the story of an ordinary mum”

?

 

“In June 2003, I was happily running my own business, a Natural Health Centre and had completed a long-term project renovating the old mining cottage that was home to me and my two girls. It was seven years since my marriage to the girls’ dad had ended and at last, life felt good again.
Then, right in the middle of this wondrous new phase of my life….” ~ Sandra Lean

During this “wondrous new phase” of Sandra Leans life her youngest daughter Ellie is presumably introduced to the alleged ‘psychopath’ called Simon (referred to in Sandra Lean’s first discredited book ‘No Smoke’) then the youngest daughter is coercived into meeting with and ‘supporting’ a sadistic teenage murderer and self confessed ‘violent goth’ called Luke Mitchell - who showed signs of violence from aged 7 and began attacking young girls from the age of 12 and also showing concerning signs of sexual aggression

More on self confessed ‘violent goth’ and sadistic killer Luke Mitchell and excerpts from his ‘pain & suffering’ English essay from January 2003 - which saw him referred to a guidance teacher
👇

Intimate Partner Femicide TIMELINE: Innocence Fraud Killer Luke Mitchell & [moderated] Sandra Lean’s Psychological Manipulation - ‘Boiling You Like A Frog’ (Part 168)

http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/02/26/innocence-fraud-killer-luke-mitchell-confidence-trickster-sandra-leans-psychological-manipulation-boiling-you-like-a-frog-part-168/

[Nicholas]

Through The Wall’ on ‘The Case Against Luke Mitchell’ Podcast By Manipulative Liar, Narcissistic Abuser, Gaslighter, Deluded Fantasist & Innocence Fraud Pusher Naomi Channel ~ COMING SOON..
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/01/30/through-the-wall-on-the-case-against-luke-mitchell-podcast-by-manipulative-liar-narcissistic-abuser-deluded-fantasist-innocence-fraud-pusher-naomi-channel/

[Nicholas]

Kristy Porteoue
What gets me is why did JuJ want to call the police when jodi was late home and hadn’t been where she was supposed to be? It wasn’t a rare occurrence by all accounts so Why was AW concerned enough to tell her to phone police? Jodi quite regularly missed her 10pm curfew at her grans and AW usually waited till JaJ finished work at 12 midnight to get her to check if jodi was in YW flat. AW didn’t believe YW that night when she called and JF had to go on the phone to convince her that Jodi wasn’t there so why would she walk past YWs flat to go looking for Jodi but not check there? Surely you’d want to check out all avenues before bothering with authorities, JuJ called AW,JaJ and a mystery person before placing the call reporting Jodi missing, it’s also really strange that x3 people Aw,SK and JuJ ’just knew’ there was something wrong 😑

 

Am guessing Kristy Porteous hasn’t heard of a mothers intuition

Heather Lungley
Yep, it doesn’t make sense🤔


 

[Nicholas]

Kristy Porteoue
What gets me is why did JuJ want to call the police when jodi was late home and hadn’t been where she was supposed to be? It wasn’t a rare occurrence by all accounts so Why was AW concerned enough to tell her to phone police? Jodi quite regularly missed her 10pm curfew at her grans and AW usually waited till JaJ finished work at 12 midnight to get her to check if jodi was in YW flat. AW didn’t believe YW that night when she called and JF had to go on the phone to convince her that Jodi wasn’t there so why would she walk past YWs flat to go looking for Jodi but not check there? Surely you’d want to check out all avenues before bothering with authorities, JuJ called AW,JaJ and a mystery person before placing the call reporting Jodi missing, it’s also really strange that x3 people Aw,SK and JuJ ’just knew’ there was something wrong 😑