Author Topic: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean  (Read 847827 times)

0 Members and 52 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2745 on: April 12, 2023, 04:02:24 AM »
Adam Holland
AW is/ was the key to cracking the case. Had the police had any interest in finding the real killer/s.
The woman knew where to go, and made sure certain folk kept out of the way.
Given the way the family turned out, it’s safe to say she wasn’t exactly the greatest role model.


 *&^^& *&^^&
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2746 on: April 12, 2023, 04:04:02 AM »
Inka Oldmoot
Adam Holland AW was the first person to raise the alarm regarding Jodi’s whereabouts at 10pm, not JUJ.
My feeling is she was expected to go home to AWs that night, because something had occurred earlier in JuJs home and they knew she wouldn’t want to stay there.
They were anxious to get her home because they had reason to suspect she’d done a runner
Why was she found with absolutely no possessions- no bag, make up, food, money.
Unless some of those items were stolen, how usual is it for a teenager to leave the house with not one solitary possession and no tea?
It suggests to me that she left quickly- she fled without even picking up any of her things.
Very similar to the way domestic. abuse victims often leave with nothing.


 *&^^&
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2747 on: April 12, 2023, 04:12:47 AM »
Ana Azaria
Rachel Roll It surprises me that the Police didn't seem bothered about the bike being heard, and the appeal document distanced the moped boys from the scene.  If the moped boys had to push their bike up the path after the engine cut out - at what point was it at the V? before, or after LK heard the sounds? JF said the engine wasn't running when it was at the V - was this after it had cut out? That would surely mean it was after LK heard those sounds - and IF he really did hear the murder, how did the boys not see anything?

Rachel Roll
Ana Azaria Exactly, it makes you think about who was where and when.
LK's evidence was led on the same day as AB's with the aim being to show the jury, that they could make the assumption that Luke was at the Easthouses end of the path and in the company of Jodi at roughly 4:54pm.
LK's evidence was led to show that there was a witness to a 'strangling' type sound coming from the other side of the wall at roughly 5:15pm.
Putting the two together the jury could infer that it was Luke and Jodi that AB saw and it was the murder taking place that LK heard therefor the time of death was 5:15pm, remember there was no forensically ascertained time of death, it was largely based on what LK said he heard and when.
Far too much weight was given to AB and LK's witness evidence. LK's statements evolved over time from, he said he felt like he was being treated like a suspect and pressured to tell the police what they wanted to hear. Given the way that the appeal judges described the way the police behaved while questioning Luke I can absolutely imagine LK being pressured.
If LK's estimated time was wrong or if he didn't hear what he finally said he heard, that throws up more questions surrounding the moped boys and any other estimated time of death would mean it was impossible for it to have been Luke.
DF gets a lot of stick but he did point these things out to the Jury.

Ana Azaria
Rachel Roll Exactly. If he heard the sounds before 5.15pm, then the moped would have been seen at the v break after that. If LK did hear the murder before 5.15pm, the boys would have seen something. But if he heard the sounds after 5.15pm, then that makes an already impossible time frame for it to have been Luke, even less possible. And the moped boys didn't say how long they stayed behind the V. If the murder happened say, at 5.20pm, Luke was seen looking normal, with no blood on him at 5.50pm, no wet hair, wearing different clothing to these 'witness' descriptions. Half an hour for a prolonged attack, moving a body, and making the 7 minute minumum journey home to change and wash, ask his mum to burn a jacket, then make his way to the wall to be seen by boys from school, all in less than 30 minutes? I don't believe it.
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2748 on: April 12, 2023, 05:21:30 AM »
Excerpts from Sandra Leans book IB;

”At what should have been a time of bright new possibility, greater support and bolstered confidence, yet another shift took me completely by surprise. A hate campaign.


‘A hate campaign’

?

”While I fully understood that many people did not understand why I did what I did and most of those did not agree with what I did, it had never really been much of an issue. Apart from the safety aspect in my immediately local area, most stated opinions had been fairly innocuous.


‘Safety aspect’

?

It began with the launch of a website in support of Luke Mitchell, some- thing that had been in the pipeline for some time, but had taken a huge amount of work to create. The furore caused by this one act was instant and vicious. Tabloids ran articles referring to “deluded” supporters, calling the site “sick” and “cruel.” The online versions of those stories allowed readers to leave comments and they did so in their dozens.


in the pipeline for sometime’

?

“..had taken a huge amount of work to create”

Un-convicted baby killer and sexual predator Billy (William) Middleton was found ‘not proven’ at the end of March 2009

He had set up his website WAP by the following month - as is evidenced by the below article 
👇
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/fury-as-dad-of-annalise-middleton-sets-1019199

Sandra Lean and un-convicted baby killer Billy (William) Middelton ended up in a relationship at some point not long after he had set up his WAP website 
👇

Twisted Reciprocal Relationships:  Abuser Sandra Lean & Her Lies, Deliberate Manipulation, Smear Campaigns, Gaslighting & The Rebranding Of Dangerous Predator’s Into Faux Victims & The Toxicity, Triangulation, Projection & Informal Fallacies Which Go Hand In Hand With Innocence Fraud (Part 18c)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/30/quite-a-hall-tale-part-18d%ef%b8%8f/

Then at some point after ‘fiend’ Billy Middleton set up his killer Luke Mitchell page on WAP, he moved in with Sandra Lean and the ‘safety aspect’ appeared to have been Sandra Lean’s youngest daughter - who seemingly unbeknown to her was sharing her home with a sexual predator, un-convicted baby killer and someone who left his cigarettes burning when he went to sleep - full of whiskey

This was also around the same time Sandra Lean and Corinne Mitchell were wrongly accusing Steven Kelly of following Jodi Jones and claiming his blood was found on her
👇
https://www.deadlinenews.co.uk/2010/06/20/mitchells-mum-points-finger-at-another-man-for-jodi-killing/

And Billy Middleton wasn’t the only un-convicted child killer Sandra Lean was shilling for - she was also promoting Billy-Jo Jenkins convicted/un-convicted killer
👇
https://miscarriageofjustice.wordpress.com/previous-blog/
« Last Edit: April 12, 2023, 06:01:55 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2749 on: April 12, 2023, 06:37:46 AM »

The Peter Hill Rough Justice video suggests the ‘cottage’ renovations were NOT completed!


Have a listen to Peter Hill and Sandra Lean talking about killer Luke Mitchell’s knives from about 09:27 of Peter Hill’s ‘The case of the presumption of guilt’

 *&^^&
« Last Edit: April 14, 2023, 11:29:17 AM by mrswah »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2750 on: April 12, 2023, 06:52:45 AM »
Twisted Reciprocal Relationships:  Abuser Sandra Lean & Her Lies, Deliberate Manipulation, Smear Campaigns, Gaslighting & The Rebranding Of Dangerous Predator’s Into Faux Victims & The Toxicity, Triangulation, Projection & Informal Fallacies Which Go Hand In Hand With Innocence Fraud (Part 18c)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/30/quite-a-hall-tale-part-18d%ef%b8%8f/

Then at some point after ‘fiend’ Billy Middleton set up his killer Luke Mitchell page on WAP, he moved in with Sandra Lean and the ‘safety aspect’ appeared to have been Sandra Lean’s youngest daughter - who seemingly unbeknown to her was sharing her home with a sexual predator, un-convicted baby killer and someone who left his cigarettes burning when he went to sleep - full of whiskey

This was also around the same time Sandra Lean and Corinne Mitchell were wrongly accusing Steven Kelly of following Jodi Jones and claiming his blood was found on her
👇
https://www.deadlinenews.co.uk/2010/06/20/mitchells-mum-points-finger-at-another-man-for-jodi-killing/

And Billy Middleton wasn’t the only un-convicted child killer Sandra Lean was shilling for - she was also promoting Billy-Jo Jenkins convicted/un-convicted killer
👇
https://miscarriageofjustice.wordpress.com/previous-blog/

Was that Ellie Lean who Peter Hill (And Sandra Lean) had climb over the wall (As an experiment) then zoomed in on her backside?

 *&^^&
« Last Edit: April 12, 2023, 06:55:53 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2751 on: April 12, 2023, 07:00:55 AM »
Was that Ellie Lean who Peter Hill (And Sandra Lean) had climb over the wall (As an experiment) then zoomed in on her backside?

 *&^^&

Was Peter Gill really attempting to suggest Sandra Lean was a ‘professional psychological profiler’

 *&^^&
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2752 on: April 12, 2023, 07:32:14 AM »
Twisted Reciprocal Relationships:  Abuser Sandra Lean & Her Lies, Deliberate Manipulation, Smear Campaigns, Gaslighting & The Rebranding Of Dangerous Predator’s Into Faux Victims & The Toxicity, Triangulation, Projection & Informal Fallacies Which Go Hand In Hand With Innocence Fraud (Part 18c)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/30/quite-a-hall-tale-part-18d%ef%b8%8f/

Then at some point after ‘fiend’ Billy Middleton set up his killer Luke Mitchell page on WAP, he moved in with Sandra Lean and the ‘safety aspect’ appeared to have been Sandra Lean’s youngest daughter - who seemingly unbeknown to her was sharing her home with a sexual predator, un-convicted baby killer and someone who left his cigarettes burning when he went to sleep - full of whiskey

This was also around the same time Sandra Lean and Corinne Mitchell were wrongly accusing Steven Kelly of following Jodi Jones and claiming his blood was found on her
👇
https://www.deadlinenews.co.uk/2010/06/20/mitchells-mum-points-finger-at-another-man-for-jodi-killing/

And Billy Middleton wasn’t the only un-convicted child killer Sandra Lean was shilling for - she was also promoting Billy-Jo Jenkins convicted/un-convicted killer
👇
https://miscarriageofjustice.wordpress.com/previous-blog/

Excerpt from IB

Fortunately, I had a colleague visiting that day who had stayed out of view but saw and heard everything. We decided to go to the police, where another shock awaited me.

‘a colleague’

 *&^^&

Un-convicted baby killer and sexual predator Billy (William) Middleton - Sandra Lean’s former boyfriend being referred to by her as ‘a colleague’

 *&^^&
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2753 on: April 12, 2023, 07:54:45 AM »
Excerpt by Sandra Lean from IB

The mutilations, according to the prosecution, were copy-cat injuries taken, by Luke, from images of the 1940s murder of Elizabeth Short in the USA. The unsolved “Black Dahlia” case, as it was called, was depicted in watercolour pictures on the website of Marilyn Manson, a goth rocker. Luke, it was alleged, was also obsessed with Manson.
Luke then coolly returned home and had his mother destroy a parka jacket he wore during the attack, in a log burner in the back garden…



This is a myth perpetuated by sadistic killer Luke Mitchell, Corinne Mitchel and Sandra Lean
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2754 on: April 12, 2023, 03:46:46 PM »

Prof David Wilson
@ProfDavidWilson
I am feeling ridiculously pleased with myself - finally tracked down the keyboard warrior who was always reviewing my books on Amazon as 1* - uncovered who he was (he used a pseudonym) found his work telephone  number and then called him!
1:14 PM · Apr 3, 2023

Mark
@Doc_Wynn
Replying to
@ProfDavidWilson
Genuine question...
What if his genuine opinion was that they (your books or anybody's for that matter) weren't very good?
Where does an author stand in regards to this kind of thing?
1:22 PM · Apr 3, 2023

Prof David Wilson
@ProfDavidWilson
Replying to
@Doc_Wynn
You accept that your books don’t appeal to everyone - that’s fine.  However when the reviews are personal and not professional that’s another matter.
1:39 PM · Apr 3, 2023

https://twitter.com/ProfDavidWilson/status/1642863131293523970


What a moron!

 David Wilson, who also didn’t attend sadistic killer Luke Mitchell’s 42 day trial,claims he’s finally watched the second part of MIAST and says the killer ‘should never have been charged’ - lol
« Last Edit: April 12, 2023, 05:53:18 PM by mrswah »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2755 on: April 12, 2023, 03:48:28 PM »
Excerpt by Sandra Lean from IB

The mutilations, according to the prosecution, were copy-cat injuries taken, by Luke, from images of the 1940s murder of Elizabeth Short in the USA. The unsolved “Black Dahlia” case, as it was called, was depicted in watercolour pictures on the website of Marilyn Manson, a goth rocker. Luke, it was alleged, was also obsessed with Manson.
Luke then coolly returned home and had his mother destroy a parka jacket he wore during the attack, in a log burner in the back garden…


Notice how David Wilson chooses to not point out who created this myth in his article for the Herald


“…nor is it true that his clothing was destroyed by his mother after the event” ~ David Wilson

This is a myth perpetuated by sadistic killer Luke Mitchell, Corinne Mitchel and Sandra Lean

The psychopathic killer blamed his mother Corinne and brother Shane Mitchell for his garden fires
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/04/09/30th-june-2003-timeline-of-14-year-old-killer-luke-mitchells-murder-part-174/

In reality -  David Wilson has no idea what went on in the Mitchell’s garden that night
« Last Edit: April 12, 2023, 05:51:41 PM by mrswah »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2756 on: April 12, 2023, 06:42:56 PM »

PROFESSOR DAVID WILSON
Luke Mitchell should never have been charged, let alone convicted
12 hrs ago
CRIME

By David Wilson
Professor of Criminology 

I’ve never needed to be convinced that miscarriages of justice happen in Scotland.


I even wrote a book - Signs of Murder - about one such miscarriage that occurred after the murder of a young woman called Margaret McLaughlin in Carluke in July 1973. In that case the police “fitted up” a local man called George Beattie, who was a bit “soft”, enjoyed train spotting as a hobby and had a below average IQ. During his fourth police interview George would go on to give what I described as a “pseudo-confession”, in which he claimed that Margaret had been stabbed by men wearing tall hats with mirrors on them, and that he had been forced

In Signs of Murder I even recount tracking down the person I believe to have been more likely to have been Margaret’s killer and report a tense exchange that I had with him on his doorstep. He wasn’t pleased.

The publication of the book led to questions being asked in the Scottish parliament and raising hopes that George, at long last, might get exonerated for a crime that he most certainly did not commit.

However, slowly and silently, the Scottish judicial system clearly decided that George had served his sentence and so what was the point of re-opening old wounds and owning up to a collective failure of having got Margaret’s murder investigation and then George’s criminal prosecution so disastrously wrong.

I knew about Margaret’s murder because it happened in the town where I once lived, and two of my sisters still call Carluke home. I left to go to university and so all of my career has been in England. I really don’t know too much about Scottish cases – unless they come to be featured in Crime Files, which I present for BBC Scotland, or they have something about them which means they get covered south of the border. Crime reporting still tends to be regional, rather than national and even the story of “Bible John” is barely known in England.


However, at a public talk that I gave last December I was asked a question about Luke Mitchell, who had been convicted in 2005 for the murder of his girlfriend Jodi Jones, after her body had been found in woodland near Dalkeith in Midlothian in 2003. I can’t remember my exact reply, but I said that I knew the case was controversial and that it generated heated debate as Luke has never admitted his guilt even after nearly 20 years in prison, although Jodi’s family remain convinced that he’s the culprit. I had also become more aware of the case, I said, because I had viewed some of a two-part documentary on Channel 5 called Murder in a Small Town. However, such was the pressure of work, I hadn’t managed to watch the second episode.

Over the last few months, prompted by several emails I have at last been able to devote time to look more fully at Luke Mitchell’s case, and what I’ve seen gives me cause for concern. What happened to Luke almost echoes all the mistakes that took place within the investigation, trial and conviction of George Beattie and so my fear is that Jodi’s killer has never been caught and punished at all.

It took me two years to research and write Signs of Murder and even then I wasn’t privy to all of the materials that would normally have been made available to me if I had been conducting an official investigation. The same holds true for what I’ve been able to read and analyse about Jodi’s murder, and nor have I devoted two years to come to a conclusion. However, I have been able to: read transcripts from Luke’s trial; consult various appeals that were made on his behalf; looked at a range of newspaper commentary (some of which supported his conviction); watched Murder in a Small Town and also part of the Trials that Shocked Scotland series; listened to a podcast about the case – which also devoted most of an episode to Luke Mitchell speaking from prison (and he clearly is an intelligent man); and delved into some social media – which I can assure you is not for the faint-hearted.


So this range of materials can hardly be described as “definitive”. Nor have I been able to look at any surviving forensic evidence – there was none in George’s case – and, if press reports are to be believed, in the wake of the screening of the Channel 5 documentary, all of this was going to be destroyed in Luke’s case, until his solicitors stepped in to prevent its destruction.

However, even accepting that I could not access all of the materials I would have wanted, there is literally nothing – nothing - I could uncover that warranted Luke even being charged with Jodi’s murder, never mind being sent to trial. Instead there seemed to be a concerted press campaign to damage his character which served to support the police’s actions, and in much the same way that George’s reputation got tarnished by his pseudo-confession – he’s alluding to the pop group Slade with his reference to men wearing tall hats with mirrors on them – Luke gets similar treatment but this time it’s the American goth-rocker Marilyn Manson that’s harnessed to do the damage. There is no forensic evidence whatsoever to connect Luke to Jodi’s murder, despite the horrifying way in which she was killed. As with George, there were no “signs of murder” on his person, and nor is it true that his clothing was destroyed by his mother after the event. Witness testimony is weak, inconsistent and more than likely wrong, and about the only thing that I could see that needed to be investigated more fully was his part in the initial discovery of Jodi’s body. However, this was not just a case of circumstantial evidence leading to a conviction, but one of literally no evidence at all.


Nothing has happened as far as George Beattie’s miscarriage is concerned and my fear is that nothing will happen about Luke Mitchell’s either. The Scottish Criminal Justice System never seems keen to admit to its mistakes but, as I have always argued, a judicial system cannot call itself mature and civilised unless it’s prepared to hold its hands up and admit when it gets things wrong.

And that’s what they did in Luke Mitchell’s case – it got things wrong, and so for me Jodi’s killer is still to be brought to justice.

Professor David Wilson is emeritus professor of criminology at Birmingham City University

Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2757 on: April 12, 2023, 07:25:38 PM »
I see Professor David Barclay disagrees with Professor David Wilson.  Which professor to believe, huh?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2758 on: April 12, 2023, 07:27:40 PM »
I see Professor David Barclay disagrees with Professor David Wilson.  Which professor to believe, huh?

Doesn’t Dave Barclay also claim the so called ‘ice cream wars’ killers were innocent? 

 *&^^&
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #2759 on: April 12, 2023, 09:20:43 PM »
That creepy grifter Peter Hill put something together on Margaret McLaughlins killer George Beatie here

👇
http://www.roughjusticetv.co.uk/

Given David Wilson’s attempting to promote the innocence fraud of Killer George Beatie, it was predictable he would end up promoting sadistic killer Luke Mitchell’s innocence fraud

Peter Hill attended killer Simon Hall’s December 2010 appeal in London

1994
https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/12542887.evidence-flaws-go-to-lord-hope-beattie-case-reaches-court-of-criminal-appeal/
« Last Edit: April 12, 2023, 09:28:13 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation