"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

And yet more

 

“Profits from this book are being donated to a new organisation, Long Road to Justice, which aims, in conjunction with other organisations, to assist and highlight cases of claimed wrongful conviction and to educate the wider public about injustice in the UK.
www.longroadtojustice.com ~ Sandra Lean (IB p.378)

 

👇
https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/04/22/killer-luke-mitchell-sandra-lean-claimed-the-profits-from-her-2018-book-were-being-donated-to-an-organisation-that-does-not-exist-part-184/

[Nicholas]

Ok, the property inclusive of gas bottles is that of the previous tenant. Procedure is to correspond with the tenant and ask them to dispose of such property. If they fail to comply with this then they face being billed by the landlord if having to do this for them. So, until something can be produced that says the landlord had taken on responsibility for the disposal of shed, gas bottles, and everything else, then the fault lies with the previous tenant who may actually face a fine for this?

A tenant who erects out buildings in their garden can be fined if they fail to dismantle and take the outbuildings with them - No different from that shed on rented land and everything within it, or on that land. Still a caravan that the night watchman used to use there also?

The fire was deemed to not be arson - Something ignited and caused that shed to combust all at once, indicative of leaking gas perhaps over a period of time into a contained area? Certainly the locals speak of the whole thing ablaze at once?

So, perhaps Ms Lean can give people the full run down on who was supposed to deal with the shed, caravan, gas bottles and any other property? Was CM supposed to dispose and remove this and failed, or was she being billed by the landlord for them having to arrange this? In brief, was there an agreement in place?  - Then a fire destroys the lot??

Extremely lucky that NO one was hurt, not the emergency services, nor some unlucky youngsters should they have taken the notion to wander in there before it went boom? - What does one imagine would have happened then? Would it be the owner of the property or the landlord to be held liable? - Just a thought.

It’s being suggested that the land was in the name of Ruby Guetta ?

[Nicholas]

How was Corinne Mitchell living on that land if it was owned by the council and for commercial use?

Was Corinne squatting on the land?

[Nicholas]

Was the land on which Scott’s caravan stood on changed from commercial use to residential use?

[Nicholas]

‘The history of this caravan is not known. The caravan was an "S.O.B." (Sale
on behalf of) caravan sold by Scott's Caravans on behalf of a customer called Mrs Horn. Corrine Mitchell, a partner in Scott's Caravans, was unable to provide further identification details or records and stated that any record relating to this transaction had been destroyed
https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/search-judgments/judgment?id=f70087a6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7

 

[Nicholas]

Shane Mitchell

Shane Mitchell was apparently watching ‘gay’ pornography in his bedroom on that fateful evening

And according to killer Luke Mitchell, Shane wasn’t at home at 17:15hrs

What happened to Corinne Mitchell’s maroon frontera 4x4 after she arrived home from work?

And did Shane Mitchell go onto have a relationship with a man or a woman?

[Nicholas]

https://www.edinburghlive.co.uk/news/edinburgh-news/family-murdered-jodi-jones-hit-26764537

[Chris_Halkides]

One, it is utterly unimportant whether Shane is straight or gay.  Two, from what I read in Sandra Lean's book, the connection to internet porn sites were a few seconds long, leaving me with the impression that these were pop-ups that were being closed.

There are phone records which strongly imply that Luke was home in the vicinity of 4 to 4:30.  If Luke did not cook Shane's meal, then perhaps Jacob Marley's ghost did.

[Vertigo Swirl]

One, it is utterly unimportant whether Shane is straight or gay.  Two, from what I read in Sandra Lean's book, the connection to internet porn sites were a few seconds long, leaving me with the impression that these were pop-ups that were being closed.

There are phone records which strongly imply that Luke was home in the vicinity of 4 to 4:30.  If Luke did not cook Shane's meal, then perhaps Jacob Marley's ghost did.

Hadn’t Shane admitted to be watching porn anyway? 

[Kenmair]

https://www.edinburghlive.co.uk/news/edinburgh-news/family-murdered-jodi-jones-hit-26764537

About time. Also in Forbes' favourite newspaper today (Daily Record online) he is referred to as "an ex-convict who has a law degree but is not a practising solicitor" The family state: "These supporters are dangerously deluded - why won't they let her rest in peace?"

For those rushing to Forbes defence as having great knowledge of the case - having access to and reading parts of the case papers does not an expert make. This serial liar and fantasist had MK as his No.1 suspect for years and still denies saying this despite it being filmed on BBC Frontline in 2007.

[Chris_Halkides]

Hadn’t Shane admitted to be watching porn anyway?

My understanding is that he said that he would not have been watching porn if he had thought Luke were in the house, which is not the same thing.  However, my larger point is that the police and prosecution manipulated Shane in multiple ways, as I indicated in a previous comment.

[Chris_Halkides]

About time.

Stories like the one in the link have appeared before, and this one provides nothing new.  That the police claim that they identified the correct person is completely unsurprising.  That the Jones family thinks that Luke Mitchell is guilty is also well known to anyone who has followed the case.

[Vertigo Swirl]

My understanding is that he said that he would not have been watching porn if he had thought Luke were in the house, which is not the same thing.  However, my larger point is that the police and prosecution manipulated Shane in multiple ways, as I indicated in a previous comment.

Which is another way of saying he was watching porn otherwise why even mention it

[Chris_Halkides]

Which is another way of saying he was watching porn otherwise why even mention it

I disagree; Shane said so in response to a question from Mr. Turnbull.  One, the connections to porn sites were only a few seconds long, from what I have read.  My general understanding is that Shane was obtaining parts for an automobile that he was fixing.  Two, I brought up Shane Mitchell on another thread to indicate that the way that the police and prosecution treated him is one of many instances of professional...lapses...on the part of the authorities.  Why Nicholas did not respond on that thread is not something that I can explain.

[Nicholas]

My understanding is that he said that he would not have been watching porn if he had thought Luke were in the house, which is not the same thing.

Killer Luke Mitchell told police his brother Shane Mitchell wasn’t in the house at 5:15pm

So where was Shane at 5:15pm?