Author Topic: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean  (Read 874017 times)

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Luke Mitchell's reaction to the photographs
« Reply #3540 on: July 13, 2023, 07:53:10 PM »
A YOUNG barman fled court as he was shown pictures of teenager Jodi Jones's mutilated corpse - shortly before the trial was halted. Barman Steven Kelly, 21, had already been tearful and complained of feeling ill before he rushed out.  He had been speaking of the horror of finding 14-year-old Jodi, his fiancee's little sister, dead beside a path.  After the lunch break, Steven had composed himself and returned to the witness box.  But then judge Lord Nimmo Smith was forced to adjourn the trial for the day after hearing that murder accused Luke Mitchell had been 'physically ill' during the break.  Donald Findlay, defending, said his client 'made every effort to return to court'.  He added: 'I am, of course, no doctor but I have been round long enough to recognise when a client is not fit enough to concentrate on the evidence.'  The judge then agreed to adjourn the case against 16-year-old Mitchell until after the weekend.
https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Witness+flees+as+Jodi+pics+shown%3B+MURDER+TRIAL+HALTED+AFTER+ACCUSED...-a0126028389

This 👆🏽is from the 10th December 2004

Killer Luke Mitchell didn’t flinch when he saw the photos and video footage on the 13th November 2004 👇

Video footage was also shown to the court and copies of the stills were given to the accused
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline faithlilly

Re: Luke Mitchell's reaction to the photographs
« Reply #3541 on: July 13, 2023, 08:11:39 PM »
This 👆🏽is from the 10th December 2004

Killer Luke Mitchell didn’t flinch when he saw the photos and video footage on the 13th November 2004 👇

Video footage was also shown to the court and copies of the stills were given to the accused

Obviously Luke had been badly affected by seeing the horrendous photographs and video of his girlfriend’s mutilated body as he was ‘physically ill ‘ during a break in proceedings.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3542 on: July 13, 2023, 08:46:56 PM »
More On Liar, Scammer & Fake “Lawyer” Scott Charles Forbes & How He Attempted To Cash In On His Nonsense Of A Story & More On Liar Heather Brunt (Part 256)
👇
https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/07/13/killer-luke-mitchell-more-on-liar-scammer-fake-lawyer-scott-charles-forbes-how-he-attempted-to-cash-in-on-his-nonsense-of-a-story-more-on-liar-heather-brunt-part/
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Luke Mitchell's reaction to the photographs
« Reply #3543 on: July 13, 2023, 08:57:26 PM »
Obviously Luke had been badly affected by seeing the horrendous photographs and video of his girlfriend’s mutilated body as he was ‘physically ill ‘ during a break in proceedings.

Yet no reaction on the 13th November 2004 or any other time during his trial?

Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3544 on: July 14, 2023, 02:30:56 PM »
Judith Jones sent the text message at 10:20pm

Jigsawman aka Sandra Lean once had the text being sent at 10:39pm

Troll Sandra Lean’s Lies & Nonsense & The Murderers Lies & Nonsense Regarding The 10:20pm Text Message & Some Fundamental Errors In The Appeal Judgement (Part 195)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/05/01/killer-luke-mitchell-troll-sandra-leans-lies-the-murderers-lies-regarding-the-1020pm-text-message-part-195/

Killer’s TIMELINE
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/04/09/30th-june-2003-timeline-of-14-year-old-killer-luke-mitchells-murder-part-174/

This 👇 is what scammer Sandra Lean stated before 30th April 2011 via the WAP website

Mrs Jones texted Luke’s phone at 10.38pm with a message for Jodi, who had been supposed to be home by 10pm. Luke called Mrs Jones back at 10.40pm to say he had not seen Jodi all evening (the call lasting approximately 2 minutes.)  Mrs Jones said she would call round Jodi’s friends to find out where she was, and, 10 minutes later, called Luke back in tears to say Jodi was not with any of her friends, and that she (Mrs Jones) was calling the police.

10 minutes later from 10:40pm would have been 10:50pm

Judith Jones telephoned the police at 10:45pm

Steven Kelly first indicated he, Janine Jones and Alice Walker left the house (Alice Walker’s house) at around 10:45pm

Sandra Lean also stated (before 30th April 2011 via the WAP website);

“..the family search party left the house by 10.45pm, having had at least two phone calls back and forth with Mrs Jones. They had also all had to get dressed, as they were ready for bed, and find torches in this time

Why did Corinne Mitchell tell the jury re her killer son Luke Mitchell “I kept trying to phone him as he was late and in trouble” if he had only allegedly left Corinne’s house at sometime after 10:50pm?

« Last Edit: July 14, 2023, 02:57:46 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3545 on: July 14, 2023, 03:30:45 PM »
This 👇 is what scammer Sandra Lean stated before 30th April 2011 via the WAP website

Mrs Jones texted Luke’s phone at 10.38pm with a message for Jodi, who had been supposed to be home by 10pm. Luke called Mrs Jones back at 10.40pm to say he had not seen Jodi all evening (the call lasting approximately 2 minutes.)  Mrs Jones said she would call round Jodi’s friends to find out where she was, and, 10 minutes later, called Luke back in tears to say Jodi was not with any of her friends, and that she (Mrs Jones) was calling the police.

10 minutes later from 10:40pm would have been 10:50pm

Judith Jones telephoned the police at 10:45pm

Steven Kelly first indicated he, Janine Jones and Alice Walker left the house (Alice Walker’s house) at around 10:45pm

Sandra Lean also stated (before 30th April 2011 via the WAP website);

“..the family search party left the house by 10.45pm, having had at least two phone calls back and forth with Mrs Jones. They had also all had to get dressed, as they were ready for bed, and find torches in this time

Why did Corinne Mitchell tell the jury re her killer son Luke Mitchell “I kept trying to phone him as he was late and in trouble” if he had only allegedly left Corinne’s house at sometime after 10:50pm?

Killer Luke Mitchell claimed his 10:41pm telephone call to Judith Jones “Did Not Connect” yet scammer Sandra Lean claimed the killer allegedly telephoned Judith Jones at 10:40 and that this alleged telephone call lasted “approximately 2 minutes”

How did the killer make his 10:41pm telephone call which “Did Not Connect” if he was meant to be talking with Judith Jones for “2 minutes

🙄
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3546 on: July 14, 2023, 03:57:31 PM »
Scammer Sandra Lean before 30th April 2011 via the WAP website under the header Phone calls & statements

At least one member of the family search party was quite adamant that they should “re-check” the path that Luke had just come up. There was, for example, no suggestion of splitting up to check both paths - (Scammer Sandra Lean).

Yet under Sandra Lean’s header How the stories changed 🙄 (Again via the WAP website)

Steven Kelly’s stated of 12th July 2003

We arrived at the junction in the path which either takes you along the back of the High school or down onto the field. We stood there for a couple of seconds as I had suggested I would walk one way and Janine and her Gran the other. (Steven Kelly) Janine said that Jodi wouldn’t walk along the path to the left, she would have went down the field 


 *&^^&
« Last Edit: July 14, 2023, 04:08:02 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3547 on: July 14, 2023, 04:18:13 PM »
This 👇 is what scammer Sandra Lean stated before 30th April 2011 via the WAP website

Mrs Jones texted Luke’s phone at 10.38pm with a message for Jodi, who had been supposed to be home by 10pm. Luke called Mrs Jones back at 10.40pm to say he had not seen Jodi all evening (the call lasting approximately 2 minutes.)  Mrs Jones said she would call round Jodi’s friends to find out where she was, and, 10 minutes later, called Luke back in tears to say Jodi was not with any of her friends, and that she (Mrs Jones) was calling the police.

10 minutes later from 10:40pm would have been 10:50pm

Judith Jones telephoned the police at 10:45pm

Scammer Sandra Lean also had sasistic killer Luke Mitchell allegedly leaving his mother Corinne Mitchell’s house at just after this 10:50pm alleged telephone call

Further, following the 10:50 call from Mrs Jones, Luke got a torch and set off up the path…”


Yet Corinne Mitchell indicates to the jury during her killer son Luke Mitchell’s trial

I kept trying to phone him as he was late and in trouble”
« Last Edit: July 14, 2023, 04:24:00 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3548 on: July 14, 2023, 04:27:28 PM »
Un-convicted baby killer Billy Middelton was updating his WAP website back on 30th April 2011 - suggesting scammer Sandra Lean had recently obtained access to some more case papers sometime just before this

Gillian Law was representing killer Luke Mitchell around this time https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/luke-mitchell-plots-appeal-over-1095460

20th February 2011

His solicitor Gillian Law staged a reconstruction involving 10 dogs and several members of his high-powered legal team.

But the reconstruction - attended by Donald Findlay QC, two junior counsel and a cameraman - was yesterday branded a fiasco by lawyer Jim Kelly

Kelly, who suggested the idea and supplied his own dogs, was stunned that Law had failed to provide an animal carcass to give the dogs a scent to track.

He said: "The prosecution case was that Mitchell must have committed the murder because he found the body. He argued that he had been taken to it by his dog.

"What we set out to do was to show that any dog would have done the same thing as he claimed, which would have cast doubt on the prosecution's claim.

"The idea was that we took 10 dogs to the woods and placed an animal carcass at the scene to show they would behave in the same way.

"The fundamental problem was that no one bothered to bring a carcass, which rendered the entire exercise as futile.

"There were eight people - including a QC and a film cameraman - and 10 dogs in the woods that day, but it was an utter waste of time. I couldn't believe what I was seeing.

"Had it been done properly, it could have cast serious doubt on the prosecution case that Mitchell found the body because he committed the murder”

Earlier this month, his appeal against the length of his sentence was rejected and three years ago his appeal against conviction was thrown out.

He has now hired lawyer Graham Mann, who is probing the reconstruction with the dogs and has spoken to Kelly.

Sources close to his new legal team confirmed they are looking at building a case around an "Anderson appeal" - arguing that Mitchell's initial representation was defective.

Based on a 1995 case, a conviction can be quashed if the defence failed to put the case properly

Bankrupt shame of Mitchell's lawyer

Mitchell's lawyer Gillian Law's highflying career has stalled under a mountain of debt. she was made a partner in Edinburgh firm Beaumont & Co after impressing boss Nigel Beaumont.

But Law has since been declared bankrupt over undisclosed debts owed to the taxman. she was sequestrated at the city's sheriff court - the same place where she defends criminal clients.

As a bankrupt, law's practising certificate was automatically suspended by the law society of scotland. After lodging an appeal, she has been allowed to return to work but with restrictions. she can no longer be a partner in the firm and is only allowed to work as an assistant. She is also banned from handling clients' cash.

Despite her debt woes, Law still drives a VW Beetle convertible with private registration. she lives with advocate Michael Anderson in a £400,000 townhouse beside Duddingston Golf club in the capital.

The Law Society said: "She has had her practising certificate restricted and can only work as an assistant”.
« Last Edit: July 14, 2023, 04:48:25 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3549 on: July 14, 2023, 04:53:00 PM »
Un-convicted baby killer Billy Middelton was updating his WAP website back on 30th April 2011 - suggesting scammer Sandra Lean had recently obtained access to some more case papers sometime just before this

Gillian Law was representing killer Luke Mitchell around this time https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/luke-mitchell-plots-appeal-over-1095460

20th February 2011

Scott Charles Forbes & Those ‘30 Boxes (Part 6)
Sandra Lean after doing an elective in paralegal work obtained Power of Attorney in 2009 and claims this was her first access to them.
👇
https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/21/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-6/

Scammer Sandra Lean appears to have obtained access to more material in early 2011, as can be seen in the screenshots of the “update” (in blue) in the below link

https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/07/14/killer-luke-mitchell-innocence-fraud-scammers-sandra-lean-un-convicted-baby-murderer-billy-middleton-from-wap-april-2011-on-actually-factually-guilty-murderer-luke-mitchell-part-258/

Or this is when scammers Sandra Lean and un-convicted baby killer Billy Middleton decided to start (publicly) targeting innocent Joe
« Last Edit: July 14, 2023, 05:16:47 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3550 on: July 14, 2023, 05:38:33 PM »
Scott Charles Forbes & Those ‘30 Boxes (Part 6)
Sandra Lean after doing an elective in paralegal work obtained Power of Attorney in 2009 and claims this was her first access to them.
👇
https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/21/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-6/

Scammer Sandra Lean appears to have obtained access to more material in early 2011, as can be seen in the screenshots of the “update” (in blue) in the below link

https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/07/14/killer-luke-mitchell-innocence-fraud-scammers-sandra-lean-un-convicted-baby-murderer-billy-middleton-from-wap-april-2011-on-actually-factually-guilty-murderer-luke-mitchell-part-258/

Or this is when scammers Sandra Lean and un-convicted baby killer Billy Middleton decided to start (publicly) targeting innocent Joe

Did scammer Sandra Lean decide to target and smear innocent Joe because he called out her nonsense a few months before - while her former boyfriend, un-convicted baby murderer Billy Middleton, was hiding behind her door?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3551 on: July 14, 2023, 05:57:03 PM »
Did scammer Sandra Lean decide to target and smear innocent Joe because he called out her nonsense a few months before - while her former boyfriend, un-convicted baby murderer Billy Middleton, was hiding behind her door?

So [Name removed] wasn’t identified by an eyewitness as the man seen following his Jodi, even though he himself said he was in bed asleep?

Who was his alibi? Ah yes, two family members.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3552 on: July 14, 2023, 06:06:38 PM »
So [Name removed] wasn’t identified by an eyewitness as the man seen following his Jodi, even though he himself said he was in bed asleep?

Do you know the name of the deluded individual who lied and chose to make a statement in an attempt to pervert the course of justice?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3553 on: July 14, 2023, 06:07:44 PM »
Who was his alibi? Ah yes, two family members.

Is Allan Ovens still a “family member”?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #3554 on: July 14, 2023, 06:17:31 PM »
Do you know the name of the deluded individual who lied and chose to make a statement in an attempt to pervert the course of justice?

The police certainly found the witness credible.

‘ Detective Inspector Tom Martin, one of the officers in the case, said: "This is a significant development for the inquiry team. We now have two independent witnesses who have given us good statements about seeing a young woman who is similar in description to Jodi.

"Both witnesses saw the girl walking in Easthouses Road towards the entrance to the Roman Dyke pathway at around 5pm and both also noticed a man walking closely behind the girl.’
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?