Author Topic: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean  (Read 877676 times)

0 Members and 22 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4035 on: September 03, 2023, 11:28:05 PM »
No

That’s exactly what you are doing and it’s a tactic we are used to from you.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4036 on: September 03, 2023, 11:29:22 PM »
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4037 on: September 03, 2023, 11:31:26 PM »
A cite please.

Colin from FLIP Inc provided evidence during killer Luke Mitchell’s trial

A receipt was also showed to the jury for the two items bought from FLIP

A replacement parka

& a t-shirt - presumably the one the killer is wearing in this photo http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/09/02/sadistic-killer-sexual-deviant-luke-mitchell-the-numerous-other-targeted-girlfriends-knife-attacks-including-kara-the-3-kimberleys-the-mystery-still-surrounding-laur-2/
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4038 on: September 03, 2023, 11:31:36 PM »
Already proven during psycho killer Luke Mitchell’s trial

Then you’ll be able to provide a cite.

Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4039 on: September 03, 2023, 11:33:02 PM »
Colin from FLIP Inc provided evidence during killer Luke Mitchell’s trial

A receipt was also showed to the jury for the two items bought from FLIP

A replacement parka

& a t-shirt

We know that. Corrine never denied that she bought the clothes. What point are you trying to make?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4040 on: September 03, 2023, 11:42:13 PM »
. What point are you trying to make?

The points have been made

Corinne Mitchell bare faced lied to James English

And there’s a wealth of evidence heard during the trial not in the public domain

There are over 40 people and their evidence still missing from this 👇list

Who are the 40 odd other witnesses and why did the mainstream media not report on their evidence?


1. Leonard Kelly
2. Judith Jones
3. Janine Jone
4. Alice Walker
5. Steven Kelly
6. Allen Ovens
7. Ronald Miller
8. Craig Dobbie
9. John [Name removed]
10. Gordon [Name removed]
11. Susan Ure
12. Anthony Busuttil
13. Rosemary Walsh
14. Lorraine Flaming
15. Carol Heatlie
16. Marion O’Sullivan
17. Derek Hamilton
18. Andrew Holburn
19. Dean Houston
20. Grant Elliot
21. Ashleigh Coutts
22. Kimberley Thomson
23. Andrina Bryson
24. Shane Mitchell
25. Corinne Mitchell
26. Dc Alan Towers
27. Dc Stephen Quinn
28. Dc George Thomson
29. Robert Gilhooly,
30. Matthew Muraska
31. Rachel Quinn
32. Alexander Hamilton
33. Keith Campbell
34. Michelle Tierney
35. Alistair Leitch
36. David High
37. David Tullock
38. Michelle Lindsay
39. Derek Scrimger
40. Alan Murray
41. Mark Heron
42. Natalie Wright
43. Raymond McCloy
44. James Aitken
45. Patricia Frankland
46. Nicholas Frankland
47. George Ramage
48. Geraldine Mackie
50. Male teacher who commented on killer Luke Mitchell looking like a “hooded monk” in his now missing khaki green parka style coat
51. DI William Cravens
52. Laura Wightman - paragraphs from Laura’s July 2003 & September 2004 witness statements read to jury
53. Dc Brian Melrose
54-56. 3 witnesses who supported Leonard Kelly’s evidence
57. The witness who was an employee for the firm of solicitors representing killer Luke Mitchell
58. Colin - a manager from Flip Inc

« Last Edit: September 03, 2023, 11:51:05 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4041 on: September 03, 2023, 11:51:48 PM »
The points have been made

Corinne Mitchell bare faced lied to James English

And there’s a wealth of evidence heard during the trial not in the public domain

1. Leonard Kelly
2. Judith Jones
3. Janine Jone
4. Alice Walker
5. Steven Kelly
6. Allen Ovens
7. Ronald Miller
8. Craig Dobbie
9. John [Name removed]
10. Gordon [Name removed]
11. Susan Ure
12. Anthony Busuttil
13. Rosemary Walsh
14. Lorraine Flaming
15. Carol Heatlie
16. Marion O’Sullivan
17. Derek Hamilton
18. Andrew Holburn
19. Dean Houston
20. Grant Elliot
21. Ashleigh Coutts
22. Kimberley Thomson
23. Andrina Bryson
24. Shane Mitchell
25. Corinne Mitchell
26. Dc Alan Towers
27. Dc Stephen Quinn
28. Dc George Thomson
29. Robert Gilhooly,
30. Matthew Muraska
31. Rachel Quinn
32. Alexander Hamilton
33. Keith Campbell
34. Michelle Tierney
35. Alistair Leitch
36. David High
37. David Tullock
38. Michelle Lindsay
39. Derek Scrimger
40. Alan Murray
41. Mark Heron
42. Natalie Wright
43. Raymond McCloy
44. James Aitken
45. Patricia Frankland
46. Nicholas Frankland
47. George Ramage
48. Geraldine Mackie
50. Male teacher who commented on killer Luke Mitchell looking like a “hooded monk” in his now missing khaki green parka style coat
51. DI William Cravens
52. Laura Wightman - paragraphs from Laura’s July 2003 & September 2004 witness statements read to jury
53. Dc Brian Melrose
54-56. 3 witnesses who supported Leonard Kelly’s evidence
57. The witness who was an employee for the firm of solicitors representing killer Luke Mitchell
58. Colin - a manager from Flip Inc

There are over 40 people and their evidence still missing from this 👆🏽list

Who are the 40 odd other witnesses and why did the mainstream media not report on their evidence?


It is you who is being dishonest.

The FLO agreed in court that Corrine Mitchell had given her the receipt for the clothes shortly after arriving home from her trip to the shops.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4042 on: September 03, 2023, 11:53:07 PM »
Corrine never denied that she bought the clothes.

One t-shirt from Flip

Where else did they shop?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4043 on: September 03, 2023, 11:54:20 PM »
It is you who is being dishonest.

The FLO agreed in court that Corrine Mitchell had given her the receipt for the clothes shortly after arriving home from her trip to the shops.

Cite
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4044 on: September 04, 2023, 12:06:08 AM »
Cite

Haven’t you heard this before? It was reported at the time of the trial. Perhaps google will help with a cite?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4045 on: September 04, 2023, 12:31:27 AM »
Haven’t you heard this before? It was reported at the time of the trial. Perhaps google will help with a cite?

Provide a cite or you are lying
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Innocence fraud killer Luke Mitchell
« Reply #4046 on: September 04, 2023, 01:19:25 AM »
Rolfe is a very logical thinker;

Oh you were referring to Morag Kerr who shilled for that psychopathic terrorist and mass murderer Abdelbaset al-Megrahi

Morag Kerr Aka Rolfe:
“Sandra says he wasn't interested in Marilyn Manson anyway,
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=336768&page=7

This again goes against killer Luke Mitchell’s own evidence

He told the police during interview he was into Marilyn Manson 

Killer Luke Mitchell & His Abusive Innocence Fraud Enablers Have Hidden The Murderers Evidence From Their Cult Followers, Including His 22 Page Written Police Statement Dated 1st July 2003 & The Content Of His 4th July & 14th August 2003 & 14th April 2004 Recorded Police Interviews (Part 65)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/09/17/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-65/
« Last Edit: September 04, 2023, 01:43:08 AM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline faithlilly

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4047 on: September 04, 2023, 11:04:59 AM »
Provide a cite or you are lying

It was reported on at the time of the trial. You’ll find it in media reports of the FLO’s witness testimony.

Now please provide a cite for a 2002 receipt presented in court for a skunting knife, the court testimony of any female attacked by Luke with a knife and the photograph of Luke wearing a parka jacket at a concert weeks before Jodi’s death?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Chris_Halkides

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4048 on: September 04, 2023, 12:32:36 PM »
These experienced officers sometimes get a hunch. Their instincts were that something was off about LM himself, and his inconsistent stories. DNA isn't the be all and end all. This case proved that. The DNA was from a laundered shirt; it was a degraded sample and not a fresh deposit (they would have been able to tell if it was a fresh deposit, even though it was left out in the rain for some 8 hours). It would have been widely reported had it been a fresh semen deposit. If it was on the body, then it got there by rainwater diffusion through the laundered t-shirt. SK was effectively ruled out by scientific facts and a solid alibi by his father and Janine herself (as well as other things). Why does Janine still alibi him in the present day? Why wasn't LM screaming and shouting when that guilty verdict came through? He was calm all throughout the entire ordeal, was he not? LM was no shrinking violet. Why no emotion from him if he was innocent?
By his own recollection, LM was not calm when the verdict was read (for what it is worth).  Regarding the ability of police to detect lies, I found this passage:  "Research has consistently shown that people's ability to detect lies is no more accurate than chance, or flipping a coin. This finding holds across all types of people — students, psychologists, judges, job interviewers and law enforcement personnel (Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2006)." Laura Zimmerman, "Deception Detection," 2016 47(3):46. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2016/03/deception#:~:text=Research%20has%20consistently%20shown%20that,Social%20Psychology%20Review%2C%202006).
As for police hunches, I have heard it said by an experienced investigator that it is OK to play a hunch, but one must know when to let that hunch die a natural death.  Let me continue this thought by saying that many problems in an investigation begin when the facts are moulded to the hunch instead.  It was a hunch of a sort that led to Andrew Malkinson's being arrested and convicted of a rape which most people now believe he did not commit.

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #4049 on: September 04, 2023, 02:09:41 PM »
It was reported on at the time of the trial.

You still haven’t explained why sadistic killer Luke Mitchell waited almost 20 minutes to telephone Judith Jones after her 10:17pm telephone call & 10:20pm text message
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation