"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

This 👆🏽sounds like David Stirling

“A witness David Stirling described an occasion in early June 2003 when he was with friends and they met the appellant at the junction of the paths.

They went down the inside of the wall (towards the "V") for some distance, then sat and smoked cannabis.

Who were the friends with David Stirling and what did they say about killer Luke Mitchell’s push bike and missing parka jacket?

[Nicholas]

Did Shane say that he saw Luke?
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/did-shane-say-that-he-saw-luke.html?m=1

The author states at the foot of the above;

“The processing of data may also come under section 1 of Data protection act 2018, no 10 - protecting the public against dishonesty”

“Protecting the public against dishonesty” comes under “condition” number 11 not 10 - which is what the author has stated at the foot of each of their blogs

”The 28 conditions which are available for the processing of criminal offence data are set out in paragraphs 1 to 37 Schedule 1 of the DPA 2018:

10. Preventing or detecting unlawful acts
11. Protecting the public against dishonesty
12. Regulatory requirements relating to unlawful acts and dishonesty
14. Preventing fraud

https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/lawful-basis/a-guide-to-lawful-basis/lawful-basis-for-processing/criminal-offence-data/

Preventing or detecting unlawful acts

10(1)This condition is met if the processing—

(a)is necessary for the purposes of the prevention or detection of an unlawful act,

(b)must be carried out without the consent of the data subject so as not to prejudice those purposes, and

(c)is necessary for reasons of substantial public interest.

(2)If the processing consists of the disclosure of personal data to a competent authority, or is carried out in preparation for such disclosure, the condition in sub-paragraph (1) is met even if, when the processing is carried out, the controller does not have an appropriate policy document in place (see paragraph 5 of this Schedule).

(3)In this paragraph—

“act” includes a failure to act;
“competent authority” has the same meaning as in Part 3 of this Act (see section 30).

Protecting the public against dishonesty etc

11(1)This condition is met if the processing—

(a)is necessary for the exercise of a protective function,

(b)must be carried out without the consent of the data subject so as not to prejudice the exercise of that function, and

(c)is necessary for reasons of substantial public interest.

(2)In this paragraph, “protective function” means a function which is intended to protect members of the public against—

(a)dishonesty, malpractice or other seriously improper conduct,

(b)unfitness or incompetence,

(c)mismanagement in the administration of a body or association, or

(d)failures in services provided by a body or association.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/12/schedule/1/enacted

[Nicholas]

Killer Luke Mitchell’s DNA & The Constant Lies & Manipulation By Hoaxer Sandra Lean (Part 128)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/11/19/killer-luke-mitchell-dna-the-constant-lies-manipulation-by-sandra-lean-part-128/

[Nicholas]

The author states at the foot of the above;

“The processing of data may also come under section 1 of Data protection act 2018, no 10 - protecting the public against dishonesty”

“Protecting the public against dishonesty” comes under “condition” number 11 not 10 - which is what the author has stated at the foot of each of their blogs

The author of the blog might have been better off using “condition” no 4 - research

How can the author “protect the public against dishonesty” if they are being dishonest themselves?

[Nicholas]

Someone asked TJ C “…are there transcripts for the whole trial anywhere”

TJ C
@TJC1419439
Unfortunately not, there were over 100 witnesses at the trial and I don't think anyone has managed to get all of the transcripts yet
9:00 PM · Nov 5, 2023
https://twitter.com/TJC1419439/status/1721271200536563893

In reality TJ C has no idea if anyone has “managed to get all of the transcripts”.

This information would not be shared with TJ C

And transcripts not being in the public domain does not mean someone hasn’t obtained copies of them

[Nicholas]

TJ C
@TJC1419439
New blog - Shane's testimony regarding seeing Luke in the house

…https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/did-shane-say-that-he-saw-luke.html…

#Lukemitchelltrial
#Justicejodijones
#justiceforlukemitchell
12:31 AM · Nov 6, 2023
https://twitter.com/TJC1419439/status/1721324406343889357

This 👆🏽is disinformation

This was a small part of “Shane Mitchell’s testimony regarding seeing Luke in the house”

[Nicholas]

TJ C
@TJC1419439
Unfortunately not, there were over 100 witnesses at the trial and I don't think anyone has managed to get all of the transcripts yet
9:00 PM · Nov 5, 2023
https://twitter.com/TJC1419439/status/1721271200536563893

“There were over 100 witnesses” scheduled to give evidence during the trial

And some of the witnesses evidence was read out during the trial, as opposed to them appearing in person, like for example the pathologist for the defence and Laura Wightman

http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/09/03/killer-luke-mitchell-over-100-witnesses-gave-evidence-during-the-murderers-trial-yet-the-mainstream-media-only-ever-reported-on-around-half-part-272/

[faithlilly]

The author of the blog might have been better off using “condition” no 4 - research

How can the author “protect the public against dishonesty” if they are being dishonest themselves?

Well?

[Nicholas]

Did Shane say that he saw Luke?
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/did-shane-say-that-he-saw-luke.html?m=1

Referring to his mother Corinne Mitchell, Shane Mitchell told the police:

“I can’t remember what she said, I normally switch-off, she talks…”

“…I normally switch off if she talks bad about a customer, ie if a customer doesn’t like dogs she doesn’t like them”

Was Shane suggesting his mother Corinne Mitchell was shallow?

What else did he say?

[Nicholas]

Killin Time 16 - “Et tu, Brute?”
👇
https://youtu.be/3fZrEsvwl4I?feature=shared

[Nicholas]

“When did Luke's mum hand in the missing knife?”
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/when-was-knife-from-pouch-handed-in-to.html

[Nicholas]

“When did Luke's mum hand in the missing knife?”
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/when-was-knife-from-pouch-handed-in-to.html

One of killer Luke Mitchell’s “missing” knives was a Jack Pyke knife with a brown wooden handle

This was NOT the knife Corinne Mitchell gave to Nigel Beaumont

Corinne Mitchell gave Nigel Beaumont a black handled replacement skunting knife, which she had purchased in December 2003

What had the jury been told about the leather Jack Pyke knife pouch before Corinne Mitchell gave evidence?

[Nicholas]

“When did Luke's mum hand in the missing knife?”
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/when-was-knife-from-pouch-handed-in-to.html

The author states,

“The search for the knife took place in April 2004”

In reality - the search for killer Luke Mitchell’s missing knives began in July 2003 

The police first searched the Mitchell’s home, garage and gardens on the 4th July 2003 looking for knives they had been told about by witnesses

Killer Luke Mitchell: Pretend Criminologist & Malignant Narcissist ‘Cult-Like Group Leader’ Sandra Lean & The Harm Her Brainwashing Is Doing (Part 102)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/10/30/__trashed-6/

[Nicholas]

TJ C
@TJC1419439
Why were we told we couldn't get the transcripts when we can, and why are there things in the transcripts we weren't told about? …http://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com
11:36 PM · Nov 7, 2023
https://twitter.com/TJC1419439/status/1722035236945457554

[Nicholas]

Two months later it was announced Matt Elliott had cancelled his video

Justice for Luke Mitchell and Jodi Jones
@SharonIndy_[Name removed]LM
Matt explain's why he was left with no choice on his group.  I feel for him in this situation. 
https://facebook.com/groups/justfourteen/?ref=share_group_link…
Luke deserves better!
Image
Last edited
3:04 PM · Oct 14, 2023
https://twitter.com/SharonIndy_[Name removed]LM/status/1713193942768869819


Matt Elliott’s Facebook group “Just Fourteen.…” is a private group with admins Sharon Indy Sunshine, Sheryl Ramsey, Donna Gee, Angie Timothy, Barbara Bacon, Angie Georgina Timothy & Matt Elliott

Matt Elliott and Donna provided fraudster Bob Ruff with their “research”

Donna Dee, one of the admins on Matt Elliott’s Fb group, looks like the spitting image of Ana Azaria

Under a 29th September 2023 Fb comment on Bob Ruff’s “truth and justice” group someone called Heather left a link regarding trial transcripts

Did Donna see this and finally contact the court?