"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

Allegations made by Scott Forbes re: Jim Kelly (reproduced for evidential, educational & research purposes only)

“Solicitor Jim Kelly said that the family’s lawyer, Nigel Beaumont, should have strongly advised against it, but he was aware that when the family looked for advice, Nigel was often inebriated and incapable. He would call up the Mitchell's late at night after drinking, talking nonsense. He was known to tell some of Edinburgh's criminals that Mitchell was 100% innocent while telling others that Luke Mitchell was a “duplicitous little b........”. 

Yet Sandra Lean said Corinne Mitchell had issues with alcohol?

“Around 2011, when we were looking into the case for a fresh appeal, we were contacted by a solicitor who had worked on the case, Jim Kelly.  Graham Mann and I met Kelly at a basement cafe in Carlton Place in Glasgow. I admired his honesty when he said he had been like others and had put his nose in the trough and had been part of an “experiment” with dogs at the locus.  He went on to describe how himself, a solicitor from Beaumont and Co., Donald Findlay QC, Findlay’s partner Jane Farquharson, and another junior counsel, staged a reconstruction with dogs of all breeds, to see how they would react.  This was all to be filmed. Mr Kelly stated, “the prosecution’s case was that Mitchell must have committed the murder because he found the body, even though he argued that he had been taken there by his dog”. Mr Kelly was involved in this reconstruction, as he supplied some the working dogs

“The Scottish Solicitors Discipline Tribunal has since struck Jim Kelly’s name from the Roll of Solicitors in Scotland for unrelated professional misconduct complaints.

Jim Kelly was struck off

More on Jim Kelly

“Luke Mitchell plots appeal over botched woodland reconstruction at Jodi Jones murder scene” by Russell Findlay dated 20th Feb 2011
👇
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/luke-mitchell-plots-appeal-over-1095460

& Gillian Law also mentioned in the above article

Bankrupt shame of Mitchell's lawyer
Mitchell's lawyer Gillian Law's highflying career has stalled under a mountain of debt. she was made a partner in Edinburgh firm Beaumont & Co after impressing boss Nigel Beaumont.
But Law has since been declared bankrupt over undisclosed debts owed to the taxman. she was sequestrated at the city's sheriff court - the same place where she defends criminal clients.
As a bankrupt, law's practising certificate was automatically suspended by the law society of scotland. After lodging an appeal, she has been allowed to return to work but with restrictions. she can no longer be a partner in the firm and is only allowed to work as an assistant. She is also banned from handling clients' cash.
Despite her debt woes, Law still drives a VW Beetle convertible with private registration. she lives with advocate Michael Anderson in a £400,000 townhouse beside Duddingston Golf club in the capital.
The Law Society said: "She has had her practising certificate restricted and can only work as an assistant."

[Kenmair]

Really? I haven’t watched her video. You’d have thought she’d have enough money to pay for her party herself, wouldn’t you….what with all the money she’s saved living rent free in your head for all these years.

Considering I joined the forum less than a year ago and you’ve been replying to most of my posts in that short period, I’m not sure you have a valid argument there. Have you seen Lean’s car crash of a video yet? It would be good to have a discussion over which parts you agree with.

In essence, she has organised a birthday party/fundraiser with supporters of a convicted killer in the town where he lived and murdered his victim. There was no support for this event from either family and can only classed as highly insensitive to the victim’s family to be having fun and games a mile down the road.

Does Lean not have any other friends she can celebrate her dotage with instead of weirdos from the internet?

[faithlilly]

Considering I joined the forum less than a year ago and you’ve been replying to most of my posts in that short period, I’m not sure you have a valid argument there. Have you seen Lean’s car crash of a video yet? It would be good to have a discussion over which parts you agree with.

In essence, she has organised a birthday party/fundraiser with supporters of a convicted killer in the town where he lived and murdered his victim. There was no support for this event from either family and can only classed as highly insensitive to the victim’s family to be having fun and games a mile down the road.

Does Lean not have any other friends she can celebrate her dotage with instead of weirdos from the internet?

You may have joined this forum less than a year ago yet you claimed to have spoken to Mark Kane about the case and he died around five years ago.

“ I spoke to  MK about that. He said he had a tiny scratch on his face that night and Forbes bullied him relentlessly if he didn't go along with his plan. ”

Looks like your interest in the case predates your membership here and, I would guess, your obsessive interest in Dr Lean predates your membership here too.

[Vertigo Swirl]

You may have joined this forum less than a year ago yet you claimed to have spoken to Mark Kane about the case and he died around five years ago.

“ I spoke to  MK about that. He said he had a tiny scratch on his face that night and Forbes bullied him relentlessly if he didn't go along with his plan. ”

Looks like your interest in the case predates your membership here and, I would guess, your obsessive interest in Dr Lean predates your membership here too.

The phrase “people in glass houses…” springs to mind here, seeing as how obsessively you have taken an interest in a certain other case and its victims for nigh on 16 years…

[Kenmair]

You may have joined this forum less than a year ago yet you claimed to have spoken to Mark Kane about the case and he died around five years ago.

“ I spoke to  MK about that. He said he had a tiny scratch on his face that night and Forbes bullied him relentlessly if he didn't go along with his plan. ”

Looks like your interest in the case predates your membership here and, I would guess, your obsessive interest in Dr Lean predates your membership here too.

The first part of your post is accurate, the rest is speculation. Of course I knew of the case since day one as I lived close by and knew MK through work. Remember SF had already appeared on BBC by this point accusing MK. I wasn't aware of the leading criminologist Lean until watching the Channel 5 joke documentary last year. I haven't even read her ficticious book but keep deflecting from the nonsense that she actually speaks instead of questioning why.

[faithlilly]

The first part of your post is accurate, the rest is speculation. Of course I knew of the case since day one as I lived close by and knew MK through work. Remember SF had already appeared on BBC by this point accusing MK. I wasn't aware of the leading criminologist Lean until watching the Channel 5 joke documentary last year. I haven't even read her ficticious book but keep deflecting from the nonsense that she actually speaks instead of questioning why.

Mark Kane wasn’t named in the BBC documentary ‘for legal reasons’.

[Nicholas]

Remember SF had already appeared on BBC by this point accusing MK. I wasn't aware of the leading criminologist Lean until watching the Channel 5 joke documentary last year.

According to Scott Forbes, Sandra Lean gave him the “paper work” in 2006 - the Devil’ Own didn’t air until May 2007

A copy of Forbes’ tweet can be viewed ⬇️

https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/21/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-4/

when he was using another one of his numerous social media accounts Ambedkar

Ambedkar
@Ambedka39148229
Replying to
@HiddenInjustice
What an imbecile, a despicable one at that. I'm reporting you to police for Stalking me. Get facts correct, I didn't give Dr Lean access to paper work on luke mitchell, Dr Lean gave me the paper work in 2006.....you absolute clown
3:36 PM · Sep 1, 2022·Twitter for Android
https://twitter.com/Ambedka39148229/status/1565347841312034816

Scammer Sandra Lean published her first innocence fraud book in 2007

Sandra Lean
No Smoke was published more than 12 years ago, before I had access to all of the case papers and I haven't read it/referenced it for many years. The book was based largely on court transcripts, which were all I had at the time. I've contacted the publisher today to ask for the book to be withdrawn.
https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9986.msg456199.html?PHPSESSID=pmphh88ms20mp9fph46gtl8aa2#msg456199

Sandra Lean ended her innocence fraud chapter on sadistic murderer Luke Mitchell with;

“More than a year after the guilty verdict, as the defence team were preparing to appeal, the existence of unidentified DNA was once again raised. Eventually, documents were released which clarified the situation – in spite of police claims during the initial investigation that there had been no DNA at the scene which had been unaccounted for, it now emerged that there had always been one DNA sample that remained unidentified.

Just prior to this book going to press, further witness statements, pointing to another, far more credible suspect were passed to the defence. The police claimed that these statements had not been followed up because the case was "closed."

http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/02/08/copy-of-chapter-from-sandra-leans-1st-discredited-smoke-mirrors-book-promoting-the-innocence-fraud-phenomenon-of-actually-factually-guilty-killer-luke-mitchell/

The above appears to be from the 2008 version of Sandra Lean’s first innocence fraud book

[Nicholas]

TJ C
@TJC1419439
Well, so far, there are a few things that don't align with what has been said by Sandra Lean - a trusted source of information on the case (in her book and otherwise). That is somewhat concerning.
7:14 PM · Nov 17, 202

Roddy Mckendry
@RoddyMckendry
Is all this transcript stuff casting doubt on Lukes innocence? I'm quite concerned
12:02 AM · Nov 18, 2023

[Nicholas]

TJ C
@TJC1419439
Well, so far, there are a few things that don't align with what has been said by Sandra Lean - a trusted source of information on the case (in her book and otherwise). That is somewhat concerning.
7:14 PM · Nov 17, 2023

Scammer Sandra Lean is NOT a trusted source and never has been?

[Nicholas]

TJ C
@TJC1419439
Well, so far, there are a few things that don't align with what has been said by Sandra Lean - a trusted source of information on the case (in her book and otherwise). That is somewhat concerning.
7:14 PM · Nov 17, 2023

Scammer Sandra Lean is NOT a trusted source and never has been?

Why didn’t scammer Sandra Lean revise or withdraw her first innocence fraud book “No Smoke” before publishing her second innocence fraud book?

[Nicholas]

Freddie Gren Admin Group expert Aka Gemma Chapman
Steph Donald to put it simply, legal actions are not free.
Yes there is a specific target - Justice for Luke Mitchell and Jodi Jones. The end goal is getting this case back in front of a court. That takes many independent experts in their fields, testing, countless administrative tasks, none of which are free. And not one expert other than Sandra Lean works for free on this case. All the volunteers can campaign until the cows come home but without funding this case goes nowhere. We are pushing hard to ensure that we will not be stopped by lack of funding. Remember the crown have unlimited funding, defense do not.

Krissy Porteous
Rosemary McGuigan there will always be the minority, that bump their gums and will try n  spoil things BUT it’s up to us! the glorious dreamteam and amazing faithful members to show that never wavering or faltering support that they/we always do and get this done! A 60th 🎉birthday bash for someone soooo deserving.
I have a feeling that any ‘mischief makers’ will fall at the first hurdle since I’m sure this venue have been strenuously warned about any trouble makers that have any ‘issues’ 😄
Bring on the party of the century!!! Whoop whoop 🙌
#partytoendallparties
#Youronly60once
#whoopwhoop🙌

Kath Green Seath
Krissy Porteous yip
Can't and won't be silenced,
Scotland's Bravest Woman 
With LM's army standing at her side.
She so deserves this party 💪

[Nicholas]

Killer Simon Hall: Brother Shaun Hall: Innocence Fraud, Donations To Keep Website Running, More Confessions, Acting Out Of Character & “Just Remember The Truth Always Comes Out In The End”- Part 11a
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/06/12/quite-a-hall-tale-part-11b%ef%b8%8f/

Murdeer Sean Toal’s mother left a message for murderer Simon Hall “who raped an old woman” (Scott C Forbes) as can be read in the above

Carol Toal also left a message for murderer Adrian Prout as can be seen in the below

The deluded mother of the murderer of Paul Gerard “PG” McGilvray is also referred to in the following;

Killer Luke Mitchell: “Dangerous Clowns” & “Confident Ignorance” - Scammers Sandra Lean & Scott Forbes From “Murder In A Small Town” Propaganda TV Show (Part 5)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/21/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-5/

[Nicholas]

Why didn’t scammer Sandra Lean revise or withdraw her first innocence fraud book “No Smoke” before publishing her second innocence fraud book?

Killer Luke Mitchell: “Dangerous Clowns” & “Confident Ignorance” - Scammers Sandra Lean & Scott Forbes From “Murder In A Small Town” Propaganda TV Show (Part 5)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/21/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-5/

Scammer Sandra Lean - on or just after 23rd May 2021;

“The first book was withdrawn to correct one typo where the wrong name was printed in error and to be updated because some of the people whose cases were featured have since died. But for some people, what they don't know, they'll just make up.

The first book was not withdrawn because it was full of lies and mistakes - I already explained that, but I guess you'll just carry on believing what you want to believe anyway.

If you watched this update, you'll have heard what I said about confident ignorance - thanks for demonstrating it for people.

I still talk about Susan May, Gordon Park and Simon Hall as well. I didn't say I stopped talking about them - I said that No Smoke was withdrawn to be UPDATED about their deaths. It really does help if you read my replies properly, otherwise you're just wasting everyone's time - including your own.

Sandra Lean’s first book was full of bare faced lies, some of which have been highlighted on this forum!

[Nicholas]

According to Scott Forbes, Sandra Lean gave him the “paper work” in 2006 - the Devil’ Own didn’t air until May 2007

A copy of Forbes’ tweet can be viewed ⬇️

https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/21/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-4/

when he was using another one of his numerous social media accounts Ambedkar

Scammer Sandra Lean published her first innocence fraud book in 2007

Sandra Lean
No Smoke was published more than 12 years ago, before I had access to all of the case papers and I haven't read it/referenced it for many years. The book was based largely on court transcripts, which were all I had at the time. I've contacted the publisher today to ask for the book to be withdrawn.
https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9986.msg456199.html?PHPSESSID=pmphh88ms20mp9fph46gtl8aa2#msg456199

Sandra Lean ended her innocence fraud chapter on sadistic murderer Luke Mitchell with;

“More than a year after the guilty verdict, as the defence team were preparing to appeal, the existence of unidentified DNA was once again raised. Eventually, documents were released which clarified the situation – in spite of police claims during the initial investigation that there had been no DNA at the scene which had been unaccounted for, it now emerged that there had always been one DNA sample that remained unidentified.

Just prior to this book going to press, further witness statements, pointing to another, far more credible suspect were passed to the defence. The police claimed that these statements had not been followed up because the case was "closed."

http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/02/08/copy-of-chapter-from-sandra-leans-1st-discredited-smoke-mirrors-book-promoting-the-innocence-fraud-phenomenon-of-actually-factually-guilty-killer-luke-mitchell/

The above appears to be from the 2008 version of Sandra Lean’s first innocence fraud book

Killer Luke Mitchell: Scott C Forbes & Those ‘30 Boxes (Part 6)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/21/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-6/

[Nicholas]

Trial transcripts for the entire trial can be requested by contacting the courts by emailing transcriptions@scotcourts.gov.uk

Your email should specify the following:

* the full name of the case = Luke Muir Mitchell dob 24th July 1988
* the court location where these proceedings were held = Edinburgh high court & Laigh hall
* the court proceedings that you wish to be transcribed including the dates of same = dates & the majority of the witness names can be found ⬇️ http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/09/06/killer-luke-mitchell-list-of-dates-when-the-majority-of-witnesses-during-murderers-trial-gave-evidence-part-273/
* the reasons you are looking for the transcripts = ie; research purposes, public interest, transparency

👇
https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/the-courts/supreme-courts/about-the-court-of-session/high-court/criminal-proceedings-transcripts

and can be published - in full - to the World Wide Web

Once trial transcripts have been transcribed it should cost much less for the already transcribed transcripts to be purchased