"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

How many sock puppet accounts do you lot have?

Does Seistan Non Serviem lead back to you lot too? 

This was posted under your 6th May 2023 Facebook post James Easton

Seistan Non Serviem
It's just the heavy metal way of saying 'F__k the mainstream.' The punks were more political about it but it is sad that they succeeded in using this to impugn Luke's character and it should have been robustly defended. My hymn book had a pentagram, 666 and an inverted cross on it. We don't live in Iran or Saudi...
But in the court of public opinion, it's an easy smear.
I was disappointed that Luke regretted getting a copy of the Satanic Bible when in prison, because he wanted to find out what it was that he was supposed to be. It's a perfectly legal book FFS! If you read it, you'll discover that Satanists don't believe in the devil, let alone worship him. Most are atheists and the term 'satanist' serves a similar two fingered attitude to them as it does for metal fans and punks.
The worst thing really is that he was into really lame and tame mainstream shock rock. There's some seriously miserable, misanthropic stuff out there which I admit I wouldn't like my teenage son getting into but that's neither here nor there. This was a modern day witch trial plain and simple. Don't be different is the message.

Seistan Non Serviem
Heather Brunt Judas Priest and Rammstein were actually taken to court (they won) for inspiring murder and suicide. Fred West was apparently into Disney films. I know which one would set me off first! But yes, they are trying to frame their target as an 'outsider.'
Having read both The Satanic Bible and The Satanic Scriptures (easy reads BTW) what fascinates me is how many powerful people in our society seem to adhere to it's egoistic and selfish code. Luke was not one of them. He just liked to rock.

AJ Az
"On 14th April 2004, at the time of his arrest, the crown office had issued guidance to newspaper editors confirming that Luke Mitchell had been charged with Jodi Jones' murder and was to appear in court the next day. Although he had been previously named, for the period after the arrest the majority of newspapers reported that 'a boy' had been arrested in relation to Jodi's murder, the Press and Journal fully named the then 15 year old boy.
The company (not the editor) Aberdeen Journals, was charged with a s.47 offence for breaching the Criminal Procedure Scotland Act 1995, which bans the publication of details that would lead to the identification of anyone under the age of 16 involved in criminal proceedings before a court.
The crown argued that proceedings were active when the article was published and that a warrant had been granted for Mitchells arrest on the 7th April, so should not have been named from this point onwards. The Newspaper argued that because Luke Mitchell had not yet appeared in court, 'what was published was not a report of any proceeding in court'.
Due to the strict wording of s.47 the sheriff concluded 'Although it might be thought that what did appear might be regarded as an attempt to circumvent the provisions of s.47, I believe that the correct approach to the matter was to strictly construe this section and when I do that I simply have no difficulty in concluding that what appeared in the newspaper in the day in question did not amount to a breach of s.47'."


Under which AJ Az aka Ana Azaria aka Ana Justice aka Donna Dee aka ILove Steak aka Boy C McC 🙄 stated;


AJ Az
Debz Tay Hi Debz, would you be able to edit the swear? It just stops trolls from being able to report the group - thanks :) We did have a post with info about Luke being named - will see if I can find it for you!

AJ Az
Debz Tay No problem at all Debz, you didn't do anything wrong - it's just frustrating that we need to be careful. There's a lot of trolls out there who will use what they can. And yep, there are so many things like this in Luke's case, where they just bent the rules. It's shocking!


I bet the police would have a field day with all your devices

[Nicholas]

I note someone posting under 'Nicholas', mentions:

"It’s a shame James Easten doesn’t appear to have the wherewithal to advise his family member/s to do the same".

Hey, that's almost my name.

Good job it isn't. How deplorable that would be, to see  an arguable, cult like following, descend into such desperation, they have zero hesitation in posting personal diatribe,

Here’s “ILove Steak” AJ Az aka Ana Azaria aka Ana Justice aka Donna Dee aka Boy C McC and some of their diatribe

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lnh7DM1uxcs

[Nicholas]

To Shane, perhaps? Or Corinne?

Why would he be phoning his mother Corinne Mitchell if (according to his nonsense) he had only just left her?

It was Grant Elliott who cycled back after getting a puncture in his tyre, so the productions relating to killer Luke Mitchell’s mobile telephone records should make it clear what time exactly the 3 youths saw him and who he phoned

[Nicholas]

Dean Houston’s evidence was  'I'm sure he was on the phone”

Dean Houston “occasionally cycled to school” with the killer

To Shane, perhaps? Or Corinne?

If you look at the timeline put together back in May 2010 the only phone call around about that time was the 5:40pm one to Judith Jones house

Timeline of Events

5.30pm Luke leaves the house and walks to the end of the street
5.32pm Luke calls Jodis house, but the line is engaged
5.40pm Luke calls the house again this time Alan Ovens answers. He says he
told Luke Jodi had left to meet him. Luke doesnt remember exactly what was said.
5.40pm Judy and Alan leave the house to go to the cemetery immediately
following the phone call from Luke (therefore Joseph now has no alibi)
5.45 5.50 Three schoolboys see Luke sitting on a wall at the end of his street (they passed him twice, as one of them got a puncture in his bike tyre, and they had to double back.)
5.50 6.05 6 witnesses say they saw a youth hanging around on the Newbattle Road, between the end of Lukes street, and the entrance to the path (although none of them claims to have seen him at the entrance itself.) Luke says he wandered up the street a little way to Barondale Cottages, which is approximately halfway between the end of his street and the entrance to the path, to see if he could see Jodi coming. He told the police this before these witnesses came forward.
6.50-6.55pm Luke phones some male friends to see what they are doing, as Jodi still hasnt shown
7pm Luke phones his mother to tell her if Jodi comes to the house, he is in The Abbey, and to tell Jodi to come there..

[Nicholas]

AJ Az aka Ana Justice🙄
James Easton None. Even if it could be said that it's odd, that he may seemingly have been wearing a green shirt, even though we've been told that he had been wearing a green bomber jacket all day - this witness saw Luke (around 6pm) after the time Police believe the murder occurred (5.15pm). There was no mention of any blood stains, so, why would there have been a need to dispose of it?

Did Andrew Holburn see killer Luke Mitchell at “around 6pm” or was the time nearer to around 5:45-5:50pm at stated back in 2010?

Timeline of Events

5.30pm Luke leaves the house and walks to the end of the street
5.32pm Luke calls Jodis house, but the line is engaged
5.40pm Luke calls the house again this time Alan Ovens answers. He says he
told Luke Jodi had left to meet him. Luke doesnt remember exactly what was said.
5.40pm Judy and Alan leave the house to go to the cemetery immediately
following the phone call from Luke (therefore Joseph now has no alibi)
5.45 5.50 Three schoolboys see Luke sitting on a wall at the end of his street (they passed him twice, as one of them got a puncture in his bike tyre, and they had to double back.)
5.50 6.05 6 witnesses say they saw a youth hanging around on the Newbattle Road, between the end of Lukes street, and the entrance to the path (although none of them claims to have seen him at the entrance itself.) Luke says he wandered up the street a little way to Barondale Cottages, which is approximately halfway between the end of his street and the entrance to the path, to see if he could see Jodi coming. He told the police this before these witnesses came forward.
6.50-6.55pm Luke phones some male friends to see what they are doing, as Jodi still hasnt shown
7pm Luke phones his mother to tell her if Jodi comes to the house, he is in The Abbey, and to tell Jodi to come there..

Dean Houston, Grant Elliott and Andrew Holburn could have seen killer Luke Mitchell at around 5:40pm when he phoned and spoke to Allen Ovens

[Nicholas]

AJ Az
Debz Tay No problem at all Debz, you didn't do anything wrong - it's just frustrating that we need to be careful. There's a lot of trolls out there who will use what they can. And yep, there are so many things like this in Luke's case, where they just bent the rules. It's shocking!

This sounds like your own psychological projections AJ Az, Ana, Boy C, Donna or whoever you will be next 🙄


Killer Luke Mitchell: Deluded ‘Flying Monkey’s’ Ronnie & Ana & Their Double Binds (Part 103)
👇
https://wordpress.com/post/theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/27872

Killer Luke Mitchell: Ana Azaria’s Snippets & Assumptions Are Based On Proven Liar & Trickster Sandra Lean (Part 81)
👇
https://wordpress.com/post/theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/25979

Killer Luke Mitchell: Sandra Lean & WAP - A Forum That Did The Very Thing It Was Titled As, Wrongly Accusing Multiple People (Part 161)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/02/10/killer-luke-mitchell-wap-a-forum-that-did-the-very-thing-it-was-titled-as-wrongly-accusing-multiple-people-part-159/

[Nicholas]

AJ Az - Facebook 5th October 2022
Cyclist heard motorbike behind wall
Another prosecution witness who stood at trial, was cyclist LK. He had described initially, hearing a rustling sound as he cycled past the area. By the trial, he was describing a strangling, human sound behind the wall. He also said: “It sounded like a gargling, restriction of someone’s throat." He estimated that the time he was in the area was between 5.05pm and 5.20pm. LK said he was alarmed when he heard the noise but had not stopped because of nerves. The prosecution attempted to use his description to further back up the claimed 5.15pm time of the murder. But – LK also stated: "I said to police in my statement that I heard a motorcycle in the woods on the other side of the wall. It seemed quite far away from the wall.”
What didn’t appear to have been questioned was, if LK had heard the moped while it was still clearly running and while he heard sounds that the prosecution believed could have been the murder taking place – and the other witness had seen the moped leaning against the V break in the wall, after it had ‘cut out’ (5.15pm)...where does that place the moped/moped boys in relation to the time of the murder? They said that they did not see Jodi, but they were in the area at and just after the sounds heard by LK, which were used by the prosecution to back up the time of death.
The appeal documents stated that LK did not see the moped boys, nor he them – suggesting that the moped boys were not in the area at the time of the murder, dismissing their relevance. However, they did not mention that LK heard a motorbike or acknowledge that this was before the bike cut out and was leaning against the wall!
The moped boys had discussed “everything” for the 5 days before going to the police and had lied about the time they were there.
JF & GDs statements largely mentioned Luke – knives, cannabis, weirdness. Their statements didn’t mention themselves until several pages in as they were so focused on Luke.
A pair of “muddy” & “damp” gloves were found in YW’s behind a radiator and reported to the police, both JF & GD said they belonged to them. Initially JF said that he had borrowed the gloves from his brother and that he had stored them in a drawer along with some condoms a knife and his wallet, according to JF the gloves were dry when he put them in the drawer and could not explain how they got damp or why they ended up behind the radiator.
In a statement dated November 26th GD said “The only other thing I remember about gloves is that sometime after the murder, JF said something about his sister YW finding a pair of wet gloves and giving them to the police. He said, 'I don’t know if they’re mine or yours but it’s a bit dodgy'. I don’t know what he meant by that but I wasn’t really bothered."
There was further confusion around what JF was wearing that night. In a statement given on 30th July JF said he had been wearing a blue sweatshirt – in a previous statement he had said he wore a yellow top.
Despite being unable to explain their movements that day at the scene of the crime and the subsequent strange behaviour which was not followed up as a reasonable line of enquiry by the police, JF and GD were still called on to give evidence AGAINST Luke.
The moped was destroyed in the days after the murder and could not be forensically tested.
#statements
#changingstatements
#factsvmedia


 

No Donna - Leonard Kelly first heard a “rustling sound” then the “strangling” sound followed straight after

 

“I said to police in my statement that I heard a motorcycle in the woods on the other side of the wall. It seemed quite far away from the wall” ~ Leonard Kelly

From the BBC - 30th November 2004

“A cyclist has claimed that he heard strangulation noises as he biked up a path near where the body of Midlothian schoolgirl Jodi Jones was found.
Leonard Kelly told the High Court in Edinburgh that he was alarmed and frightened by the noise.

Why didn’t the BBC report on the other witnesses who gave evidence in support of Leonard Kelly’s evidence?

[Nicholas]

Heather Brunt again publishing photographs of an innocent man not remotely linked to this case in anyway, shape or form

 

Rachel Roll - Facebook 24th April 2023
The Daily Record who just last month reported on the DNA swabs that were never tested have got another article up today... Family of murdered Jodi Jones slam campaigners who claim DNA samples were 'never tested'
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/family-murdered-jodi-jones-slam-29789352

Heather Brunt
Sandra Lean I wasted a day on that article. I'll be pinching bits all day from your post to tweet if that's ok. Just the factual stuff. The bull SF had yesterday was frustrating to read from the DR and twitter, the usual culprit.

Sandra Lean
Heather Brunt You use anything you like, Heather!!! This stuff makes me so angry, but I don't have the time to follow up on it, especially when it's everywhere at once. So happy to see you nailing them, though - thank you!!!

[Nicholas]

How many sock puppet accounts do you lot have?

Was this also you James Easton ?

Seistan Non Serviem
Thank goodness they only "slammed" us. We might have been "blasted" and Sandra could've been called a "boffin."
It doesn't matter one way or the other what the victim's family think. Proximity to the victim doesn't afford privileged insight.
They can't even name the 'journalist' who wrote the piece, let alone the family member. It's pathetic.


or was this James ‘Junior’ Easton ?

[Nicholas]

Heather Brunt again publishing photographs of an innocent man not remotely linked to this case in anyway, shape or form

 

Rachel Roll - Facebook 24th April 2023
The Daily Record who just last month reported on the DNA swabs that were never tested have got another article up today... Family of murdered Jodi Jones slam campaigners who claim DNA samples were 'never tested'
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/family-murdered-jodi-jones-slam-29789352

Heather Brunt
Sandra Lean I wasted a day on that article. I'll be pinching bits all day from your post to tweet if that's ok. Just the factual stuff. The bull SF had yesterday was frustrating to read from the DR and twitter, the usual culprit.

Sandra Lean
Heather Brunt You use anything you like, Heather!!! This stuff makes me so angry, but I don't have the time to follow up on it, especially when it's everywhere at once. So happy to see you nailing them, though - thank you!!!

AJ Az
On one hand, they're saying that the Police told them everything had been tested and therefor this should be trusted and is fact - but on the other hand, they're saying that untested evidence on a list - provided by the Police - doesn't actually exist, because 'Luke supporters know nothing about the CJS'.
Confirmation bias at its finest.


What knowledge of the criminal justice system do you have Donna?

[Nicholas]

Freddie Gren Aka Gemma Chapman
There is nothing coherent with a different view. Some ramblings here and there on twitter and forums lead by a person known to the case, other than that...

Who were you referring to Gemma?

[Nicholas]

Was this also you James Easton ?

Seistan Non Serviem
Thank goodness they only "slammed" us. We might have been "blasted" and Sandra could've been called a "boffin."
It doesn't matter one way or the other what the victim's family think. Proximity to the victim doesn't afford privileged insight.
They can't even name the 'journalist' who wrote the piece, let alone the family member. It's pathetic.

or was this James ‘Junior’ Easton ?

Seistan Non Serviem - Facebook 3rd October 2023
I don't mean to be rough but the "other point of view" is the dominant one: It's that he was found guilty by a jury and therefore did it.
The "other point of view" has a 14 year old banged up for 20 years with no prospect of release for a murder he literally couldn't have committed in the only time frame the police could find to fit up their only suspect.
We are the other point of view!

Seistan Non Serviem
Mary J Hamilton It's bollocks. To contend that the majority of people in Luke's street, Dalkeith or wider think he's innocent is bollocks. The majority 'think' what they are spoon fed because they are lazy and disinterested that's all. If it came out on telly tomorrow that there was nothing at all to convict Luke (which is true) then they'd believe that because they'd believe anything. If you're looking for conspiracy theories such as ned s..m families with aristocratic connections, then you are being sent down one of the many rabbit holes they have dug for us.
The truth is in front of the face of those who scratch the surface of this farce, not buried beneath ancient bloodlines designed to distract us all.


Seistan Non Serviem - 23rd October 2023
We share 98% of our DNA with pigs🤣 I think the closest they got to Luke was that the DNA was male.

Seistan Non Serviem
The cynical and profoundly dishonest attempt to mislead a jury is the elephant in the room here.

Seistan Non Serviem - 7th November 2023
Yes the timeframe makes it impossible INITSELF. 45mins to travel a kilometer undetected in rush hour, remove all traces of DNA from a "bloodbath" murder whilst retaining greasy hair, neck and grubby fingernails and all that only after he'd managed to remove ALL his own DNA traces from the crimescene while leaving those of 5 others. For me - that's enough ...but of course it gets more ridiculous...

Seistan Non Serviem - 20th November 2023
The book 'Innocents Betrayed' by Sandra Lean is your starting point.

 

[Nicholas]

Initially, I didn't think she was of dubious character, but, the more exposure I've gotten to her, the more disillusioned I've become. I think she's a decent woman at heart, but does herself no favours by persisting with this obviously bogus campaign - particularly when a lot of her campaigners are wronguns. She would have more integrity if she had written books that highlight cases and convictions that actually were/are replete with inconsistencies and malpractice, or at least use her doctorate in a more positive and honest way, instead of the insidious, underhand way she has been.

Sandra Lean’s “doctorate” is based on sand

She made claim in/around 2010 she was not allowed to use any of the cases from her 1st innocence fraud book - what cases did she refer to in her ‘thesis’?

Sandra Lean
“Interviews for the PhD must be kept anonymous, and are a completely separate issue from any books. This is made absolutely clear to anyone who is participating in the research. Furthermore, cases which have been featured in the book cannot be used for the PhD. Again, documented evidence is available

Here Sandra Lean refers to Corinne Mitchell

Excerpt from page 137 of con-artist Sandra Lean’s ‘thesis’ Hidden In Plain View

“The mother of a minor, held by police in extremely traumatic circumstances, was unaware of his whereabouts, or the trauma which had occurred (the discovery of a murder victim). Her repeated attempts to reach him on his mobile phone were known to police, who were in possession of the mobile phone, but ignored for 90 minutes, after which she was simply told to make her way to the local police station. On arrival, she found her son had been stripped naked, searched, and placed in a paper suit, without any responsible adult present, even though police officers knew she was on her way to the police station.

[Nicholas]

So, not home having imaginary conversations with mother at 5:05pm, not home having imaginary conversations with mother at 9pm, not home borrowing any torch of any imaginary brother at 10:50pm. Not home to leave from there with any mother or brother to go with him. Not standing around on Newbattle road waiting on any dead person and on it goes.

The worry of a son who had crossed over into being a killer, disappears leaving his mother frantic of what would happen next. Trying to get a hold of him. And they just keep on lying. Fantasist Forbes along with CM and of course your good self with Leans head on. This rushing to the station and upon her arrival her son being stripped and forensically examined all over. FF takes it one better, all within the hour of Mitchell leading Jodi's family directly to her body. Let us have a look at these lies, shall we?

One was indeed frantic, diving into those shoes and grabbing her coat to "run" like the proverbial bat out of hell to that station. Where was SM? where was PM? Has to "run" can't drive, no car? no one to take her there? So off she goes in what is a ten minute walk. The station chosen for ease of access, local to their house.

She is stopped on Newbattle Road, so a shorter distance still, the car with Luke sitting in the back. The police roll down the window and she blurts out in her worry, "Jodi's dead!" and asks "Is he under arrest?" She already knew that Jodi was dead, had known all evening, Luke had blanked her, only prior knowledge of the horrific deed in mind. The very reason for having no concern as stated. So she arrives a couple of minutes max behind her son at the station, he had not been stripped and forensically examined all over by the time of her arrival at all, had he now. - Compulsive liars with compulsive liars enabling him/them.

What did Shane Mitchell tell the police he was doing from around 10pm and beyond, before he was arrested for attempting to pervert the course of justice?

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean’s “doctorate” is based on sand

She made claim in/around 2010 she was not allowed to use any of the cases from her 1st innocence fraud book - what cases did she refer to in her ‘thesis’?

Page 141 of Sandra Lean’s ‘thesis’

”One family reported a combination of misleading information, dishonesty, coercion and threats in quick succession, long before the accused was ever identified as a suspect:

“They brought us back from the station. We were exhausted, in total shock, we just couldn‟t believe it. We‟d been there all night, but there was nothing we could tell them... my son found the body, that was really it... Over the next few weeks, it was like a nightmare. The liaison officer was the worst. She kept telling us “It’s just procedure, it‟s just procedure.‟ That was their favourite – everything they did was just procedure. When they descended on us at 7 o‟clock in the morning, this female cop, she kept barking at me, stand up, sit down, go over there, get over here. I hadn‟t a clue what was going on, but I thought, well, we‟ve got nothing to hide – let them get on with it...they weren‟t going to find anything, cos there was nothing to find. I found out later they waited until we were out of the house, and then they searched it. They questioned my other son – they told him, we‟ve got people telling us this and that – trying to make him think his brother was lying...We didn‟t know what to do. I asked them, is *** a suspect? No, they said, this is just procedure. But they were telling his brother, if we find out you‟re lying ... that‟s really serious... you‟ll go down for it.‟
(family member, accused convicted, sentenced to 20 years.)

What time exatly did Shane Mitchell drop off clothes at Dalkeith police station and what did Shane do after he had done this?