"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

Excerpt from page 137 of con-artist Sandra Lean’s ‘thesis’ Hidden In Plain View

“The mother of a minor, held by police in extremely traumatic circumstances, was unaware of his whereabouts, or the trauma which had occurred (the discovery of a murder victim). Her repeated attempts to reach him on his mobile phone were known to police, who were in possession of the mobile phone, but ignored for 90 minutes, after which she was simply told to make her way to the local police station. On arrival, she found her son had been stripped naked, searched, and placed in a paper suit, without any responsible adult present, even though police officers knew she was on her way to the police station.

Why did sadistic murderer Luke Mitchell ignore his mother Corinne Mitchell’s calls for 90 minutes?

Liar Corinne Mitchell still hasn’t explained why, according to her killer son, she allegedly suggested he go out searching that ‘secluded path’ on his own that night and why Corinne or Shane Mitchell didn’t accompany him

[Nicholas]

Here is the May 2010 timeline former policeman John put together based on what he was told by scammers Corinne Mitchell, Sandra Lean and un-convicted baby killer Billy Middleton and possibly what he gleaned from media articles around the time(?)

Timeline of Events

4.05pm Jodi returns home from school
4.34 4.38pm Series of texts between Lukes phone and Judys phone (Jodis phone was broken, so Jodi borrowed her mothers)
4.39pm (approx) Judy plays a Rod Stewart track which lasts more than 5 minutes to Jodi and Joseph, leaving just 4 minutes for Jodi to get ready and leave in order for Bryson to have spotted her at 4.48
4.48-4.54pm Andrina Bryson sees a girl and a youth on the entrance to the path
4.50-4.55pm [Name removed] leaves on the motorbike to meet [Name removed] at 5pm. It is believed (although not confirmed) that he picked up the bike from [Name removed]s garden and drove along Lady path which runs at right angles to Roans Dyke, before cutting through the woods to meet [Name removed].
4.55pm Luke phones his mothers work and speaks to his grandmother
4.58pm 5.10 (approx) Shane is on the internet, so the home landline is engaged.
5.00pm Two youths on the moped are chased from the tool hire premises at Newbattle, and head towards the Newbattle entrance to the path
5.03pm Luke phones the speaking clock from his mobile
5.03 5.05pm Mystery man is spotted by 2 witnesses following Jodi on the street, on her way to the path. (Spot the obvious mistake according to the Bryson sighting, she was already on the path some 9 minutes earlier) Bryson did not see the mystery man
5.03-5.15pm Somewhere in this time window, the young mum was seen walking up the same street. She saw nothing.
5.03 5.15pm A cyclist travelling up the path from the Newbattle end hears a strangling sound behind the wall. He does not see the boys on the moped, or the mystery man, or Jodi
5.05pm The youths are seen re-starting the bike, which has cut out, at the entrance to the path
5.07pmCorinne captured on CCTV in the local shop on her way home from work

Alan Turnbull: And look at the next one for me please. By this stage the time is 17:10 and 24 seconds

Shane Mitchell: Yes

Alan Turnbull: And it looks like you mother is leaving the shop

Shane Mitchell: Right

[James_Easton]

THE KNIVES AND THE POEM

Additionally, case material analysis, incorporating the factual evidence from ongoing acquisition of, previously unseen in public, actual trial transcripts.

https://m.facebook.com/groups/594743596079701/?ref=share

[Myster]

THE KNIVES AND THE POEM

Additionally, case material analysis, incorporating the factual evidence from ongoing acquisition of, previously unseen in public, actual trial transcripts.

https://m.facebook.com/groups/594743596079701/?ref=share

James... Have you an alternative link, say to your blog, for those who are not and have no intention of being Facebook members?

[Nicholas]

May 2019

James English: So was Luke, that night as well, did he go out and play with friends

Corinne Mitchell: Yes

James English: And did they go to court, were they witnesses

Corinne Mitchell: They weren’t in court no

 

Both David Tullock and David High gave evidence during killer Luke Mitchell’s trial

The name of the other lad, who was with David Tullock, is not yet known

[Nicholas]

Killer Luke Mitchell: Scammer Sandra Lean & Her Bogus Stirling University PhD Thesis Aptly Titled “Hiding In Plain View” (Part 280)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/12/04/killer-luke-mitchell-scammer-sandra-lean-her-stirling-university-phd-thesis-aptly-titled-hiding-in-plain-view/


Killer Simon Hall: Scammer Sandra Lean’s Fabricated ‘PhD’ Should Be Revoked With Immediate Effect! - Part 18g
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/08/31/quite-a-hall-tale-part-18f%ef%b8%8f/


Killer Simon Hall: Continued.. Sandra Lean’s Fabricated ‘PhD’ Should Be Revoked With Immediate Effect! - Part 18h
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/12/15/continued-sandra-leans-fabricated-phd-should-be-revoked-with-immediate-effect-part-18h%ef%b8%8f/

[Nicholas]

May 2019

James English: So was Luke, that night as well, did he go out and play with friends

Corinne Mitchell: Yes

James English: And did they go to court, were they witnesses

Corinne Mitchell: They weren’t in court no

 

Both David Tullock and David High gave evidence during killer Luke Mitchell’s trial

The name of the other lad, who was with David Tullock, is not yet known

May 2019

James English: What was the events, leading up to when Jodi went missing

Corrine Mitchell: Right, well Luke left the house at about 20 to 6 to sit at the end of our street, eh to wait for her coming

If this was the case, why didn’t liar Corinne Mitchell say her killer son Luke Mitchell made the 5:32pm amd 5:40pm phone calls when he was with her

 

[Nicholas]

James Easton - Facebook 4th December 2023
Steph Donald Some years ago, I wrote a number of published ''positive' articles, related to the  now well-known 'Rendlesham Forest, alleged, December, 1980 'UFO' incidents.
However, subsequently... quoting a related BBC article:
"James Easton, a writer specialising in UFO phenomena, recently unearthed the eyewitness reports, hidden in a released US government file.
Easton says that they make breathtaking reading. Each individual account conflicts with the other. But most damning of all is the admission that the men knew they were 'chasing lighthouse beams' from the Orford Ness lighthouse'.".
This resulted in a BBC documentary and also:
https://www.skeptic.org.uk/2006/04/from-the-archive-the-truth-about-rendlesham/
The hate e-mail basket was resultantly overflowing!
Thankfully, I am way too thick-skinned and it comes with the territory, if you are perceived as threatening to someone's deep-rooted beliefs.
Conversely, I have researched cases which were a skeptic's delight, only to evidence the opposite and you end up with their wrath!
The Luke Mitchell case is, currently, a classic example of something I wrote in 2019:
"I'm happy to sit on the fence at present, giving due consideration and respect to alternative theories. Sure, it's often a pain in the @rse sitting up here... I can see both sides though...".

 

You and Donna Aka Ana Azaria Aka AJ Az & all her other sock puppets were hardly sitting “on the fence” James Easton!

Many people are stating you and your daughter are more about “settling scores” with scammer Sandra Lean as opposed to actually exposing her and killer Luke Mitchell’s hoax PR spin campaign

What say you?

[Nicholas]

James Easton - Facebook 4th December 2023
Steph Donald Some years ago, I wrote a number of published ''positive' articles, related to the  now well-known 'Rendlesham Forest, alleged, December, 1980 'UFO' incidents.
However, subsequently... quoting a related BBC article:
"James Easton, a writer specialising in UFO phenomena, recently unearthed the eyewitness reports, hidden in a released US government file.
Easton says that they make breathtaking reading. Each individual account conflicts with the other. But most damning of all is the admission that the men knew they were 'chasing lighthouse beams' from the Orford Ness lighthouse'.".
This resulted in a BBC documentary and also:
https://www.skeptic.org.uk/2006/04/from-the-archive-the-truth-about-rendlesham/
The hate e-mail basket was resultantly overflowing!
Thankfully, I am way too thick-skinned and it comes with the territory, if you are perceived as threatening to someone's deep-rooted beliefs.
Conversely, I have researched cases which were a skeptic's delight, only to evidence the opposite and you end up with their wrath!
The Luke Mitchell case is, currently, a classic example of something I wrote in 2019:
“I'm happy to sit on the fence at present, giving due consideration and respect to alternative theories. Sure, it's often a pain in the @rse sitting up here... I can see both sides though...".

If you are “way too thick-skinned” as you allege, why won’t you answer questions here?

It appears to many of us that you and your daughter perceive this forum as “threatening” - why?

[Nicholas]

James Easton on the 19th November 2023 you stated on Twitter

“The transcripts are gradually being purchased by those who are well known as expressing concerns re a possible unsafe conviction”

Who are the people who are “well known as expressing concerns re a possible unsafe conviction” ?

Were you referring to yourself and you daughter and son?

[Nicholas]

Christopher John Halkides
Regarding Fleming and Walsh, I don't find their testimony all that informative.  Yet it might be worth pursuing the issue of the jogger that they also saw.  Sandra Lean wrote that the jogger was found and went on to indicate that the jogger's route would place their alleged sighting of Luke closer to where he said he was, and therefore further from the entrance to the path.

James Easton
Christopher John Halkides Absolutely agreed re the jogger and thank you for the so meaningful contributions.

When have you ever seen Rosemary Walsh and Lorraine Fleming full testimony? 🙄

Rosemary Walsh and Lorraine Fleming saw killer Luke Mitchell at the wooden gate

A photograph of the wooden gate can be viewed here 👇 - taken by former policeman John in 2009


Scammer Sandra Lean & Her Laughable Eye Witness Testimony; Carol Heatlie, Rosemary Walsh, Lorraine Fleming, Andrina Bryson, Marion O’Sullivan, Derek Hamilton, Andrew Holburn, Dean Houston, Grant Elliot & The Jogger “Trick” (Part 43)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/09/04/warped-minded-abuser-gaslighter-con-artist-hypocrite-scott-forbes-his-blatant-lies-part-43/


Scammer Sandra Lean stated in her 2nd innocence fraud book page 126;

“Lorraine Fleming and Rosemary Walsh were sisters-in-law, who said they saw a youth who could have been Luke on the Newbattle Road, close to the entrance to the path.


There are two photographs in the above blog that show where the entrance to the path was in comparison to the wooden gate, where the two witnesses said they saw killer Luke Mitchell

[Nicholas]

Where’s page 2198 of Shane Mitchell’s testimony?

https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/shane-mitchell-full-transcript-13012005.html

[Nicholas]

Where’s page 2198 of Shane Mitchell’s testimony?

https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/11/shane-mitchell-full-transcript-13012005.html

Page 2200

What was Shane Mitchell “told to….. ?

What exactly did Corinne Mitchell tell her older son Shane when she phoned him from Dalkeith police station?

And if Shane “eventually” went back to bed, what time was this?

The court of appeal judgement stated at para 159

At the conclusion of the interview with the accused, which was not under caution and in respect of which evidence had been led without objection, he agreed to the taking of his clothes by the police and the examination of his person and the taking of a blood sample by a police surgeon

Did the appeal judges get the above wrong too or was the impression given at trial, that Shane Mitchell went to the police station earlier than he actually did?

Corinne Mitchell said her and her killer son Luke Mitchell were driven home from the police station by the police, so why did Shane Mitchell need to take clothes to the police station?

Killer Luke Mitchell would have been dropped off right to his door, no one would have seen him?

What exactly did the police officers who dealt with Corinne and killer Luke Mitchell tell the jury about the events of the night/morning of the 1st July 2003?

[Nicholas]

Page 2200

What was Shane Mitchell “told to….. ?

What exactly did Corinne Mitchell tell her older son Shane when she phoned him from Dalkeith police station?

And if Shane “eventually” went back to bed, what time was this?

The court of appeal judgement stated at para 159

At the conclusion of the interview with the accused, which was not under caution and in respect of which evidence had been led without objection, he agreed to the taking of his clothes by the police and the examination of his person and the taking of a blood sample by a police surgeon
https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/search-judgments/judgment?id=e2988aa6-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7

Did the appeal judges get the above wrong too or was the impression given at trial, that Shane Mitchell went to the police station earlier than he actually did?

Corinne Mitchell said her and her killer son Luke Mitchell were driven home from the police station by the police, so why did Shane Mitchell need to take clothes to the police station?

Killer Luke Mitchell would have been dropped off right to his door, no one would have seen him?

What exactly did the police officers who dealt with Corinne and killer Luke Mitchell tell the jury about the events of the night/morning of the 1st July 2003?

This is all very fishy

Killer Luke Mitchell claimed he got a torch from his brother Shane Mitchell before he went out pretending to search for Jodi Jones

Shane Mitchell did not support his killer brothers claim about the torch either

And Shane Mitchell said he didn’t hear about anything until his mother phoned and woke him up and asked him to bring killer Luke clothes to the police station

[Nicholas]

James Easton - Facebook 4th December 2023
Steph Donald Some years ago, I wrote a number of published ''positive' articles, related to the  now well-known 'Rendlesham Forest, alleged, December, 1980 'UFO' incidents.
However, subsequently... quoting a related BBC article:
"James Easton, a writer specialising in UFO phenomena, recently unearthed the eyewitness reports, hidden in a released US government file.
Easton says that they make breathtaking reading. Each individual account conflicts with the other. But most damning of all is the admission that the men knew they were 'chasing lighthouse beams' from the Orford Ness lighthouse'.".
This resulted in a BBC documentary and also:
https://www.skeptic.org.uk/2006/04/from-the-archive-the-truth-about-rendlesham/
The hate e-mail basket was resultantly overflowing!
Thankfully, I am way too thick-skinned and it comes with the territory, if you are perceived as threatening to someone's deep-rooted beliefs.
Conversely, I have researched cases which were a skeptic's delight, only to evidence the opposite and you end up with their wrath!
The Luke Mitchell case is, currently, a classic example of something I wrote in 2019:
"I'm happy to sit on the fence at present, giving due consideration and respect to alternative theories. Sure, it's often a pain in the @rse sitting up here... I can see both sides though...".