Author Topic: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean  (Read 878062 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5070 on: December 06, 2023, 01:52:34 PM »
It shows that the search trio were consistent, but it also implies they agreed with what LM claimed, which is blatantly false.

Donna Easton stated on the 29th November 2023::

“We have dedicated years to this campaign

We fought for justice for Luke based on specific facts we weee told - we absolutely have the right to speak out about the fact some of them weren’t correct   (sic)


Donna Easton has been “brainwashed”

It will probably take her some time to figure out what is fact and what is fiction

This is seemingly what Donna currently thinks are the relevant facts of the case against killer Luke Mitchell

”Main planks

* number 1 Finding of the body

* number 2 Witness sighting

* number 3 Luke’s brothers testimony

« Last Edit: December 06, 2023, 02:16:37 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5071 on: December 06, 2023, 02:11:35 PM »
The barely more is the seconds LM was over the wall. We see clearer now, that whilst LM went to the V with his dog, starting to go up the wall, JaJ's with SK commenced their walk past this point. Around 10 -15ft no more than "20" when LM shouted out from "behind them". That they had already covered a few steps by the time LM was plonking his feet into the woodland?  That AW had stood back from the wall, seeing LM to the right of the V break and not the left. That the other two had ran back that short distance and he was on the other side. It could not be clearer that LM was at least, in excess of 30ft away from that 43ft distance! That everything he described was from an earlier point in time. The tree by type, "5ft in from the wall" The clothing, injuries and that "scrunchy!" I don't believe LM moved into that passage at all now. And if he did, for a couple of feet go left, it had absolutely zero to do with anything to do with that dog!

Donna Easton read this out loud in her new video

Alice Walker stated;

“And that’s when I was standing holding the dog and it was pulling. And that’s when Luke said there is something here, and he was standing to the right of the V when he said this

It doesn’t look like sadistic killer Luke Mitchell moved much behind the V break in the wall - other than a bit to the right

What was it Corinne Mitchell called him “an idiot” for not turning left

I’m with you on this Parky

I don’t think he moved into that passage near the wall either - it appears Steven Kelly was the first one to actually do this

Some more context;

Alan Turnbull: Did you say whether or not you were able to see him after that. Before he said something?

Alice Walker: Yes, because I came back with the dog, back from.. I actually took the dog back from the wall and I stood in front of the V. And that’s when I was standing holding the dog and it was pulling. And that’s when Luke said there is something here, and he was standing to the right of the V when he said this

« Last Edit: December 06, 2023, 02:30:33 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5072 on: December 06, 2023, 02:43:11 PM »
Alan Turnbull: Did you say whether or not you were able to see him after that. Before he said something?

Alice Walker: Yes, because I came back with the dog, back from.. I actually took the dog back from the wall and I stood in front of the V. And that’s when I was standing holding the dog and it was pulling. And that’s when Luke said there is something here, and he was standing to the right of the V when he said this


Why wasn’t this 👆🏽within your “3 main planks” Donna Easton?

You claimed sadistic killer Luke Mitchell found Jodi Jones body?

”Main planks
* number 1 Finding of the body

Where is the evidence for this?

Donna why did you claim in your video

“There were 3 main planks that the prosecution focused on, number 1 was that Luke found the body, number 2 was a witness sighting placing him on the path around the time of the murder and number 3 was that his brother had amended his statement to say that Luke was home when he hadn’t seen him in the house at all

You then stated;

“..by the trial it was said that Luke had just walked straight to the wall, as if he’d known that Jodi’s body lay behind it
« Last Edit: December 06, 2023, 11:29:29 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5073 on: December 06, 2023, 02:58:12 PM »
“There were 3 main planks that the prosecution focused on, number 1 was that Luke found the body, number 2 was a witness sighting placing him on the path around the time of the murder and number 3 was that his brother had amended his statement to say that Luke was home when he hadn’t seen him in the house at all

Wasn’t this what the defence “focused” on Donna Easton?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5074 on: December 06, 2023, 03:06:33 PM »
Wasn’t this what the defence “focused” on Donna Easton?

Also Donna Easton you stated;

“…and that seems pretty understandable considering 17 months had passed since Jodi’s murder and the start of the trial”

Again Donna - Jodi Jones did not murder anyone!!

Why didn’t you mention anything about trauma?

Wouldn’t trauma have impacted on the memory of Jodi Jones loved ones?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Parky41

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5075 on: December 06, 2023, 03:07:56 PM »
Wasn’t this what the defence “focused” on Donna Easton?

It was of guilty knowledge - That he knew where the victims body could be located and information only her killer could have known. Demonstrated by showing he had not been near the body in the search, that his dog had nothing to do with him knowing in which direction the body lay.

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5076 on: December 06, 2023, 03:10:45 PM »
It was of guilty knowledge

You know this Parky, I know this and numerous others know this yet Donna Easton stated;

“There were 3 main planks that the prosecution focused on, number 1 was that Luke found the body,

There was zero evidence that sadistic killer Luke Mitchell “found the body”

This was and is smoke and mirrors

Which Donna Easton is still promoting

 *&^^&

This is the same Donna Easton who is referring to accuracy in her new video
« Last Edit: December 06, 2023, 03:14:37 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Mr Apples

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5077 on: December 06, 2023, 03:14:57 PM »
It's interesting that the police suggest, if I interpreted part 2 of SM's testimony correctly, that CM's Maroon Frontera was spotted parked at the NB rd entrance to the RDP @ 1715 on 30.06.03. One wonders if that time is accurate and who may have been driving the Frontera. I am a bit skeptical of the veracity of this info, but, at the same time, it's a possibility (it could, of course, have been mere coincidence since CM came home that way from work sometimes?? Maybe the car wasn't parked as such, but merely CM was driving home on NB rd??). Maybe LM had texted either his mother or brother as soon as he murdered Jodi (ie at 1710ish)  and asked for help in some way (either requesting a lift back to the house or a change of clothes). Such a strange case.

LM must've murdered that girl almost immediately when they entered the woodland strip. I do wonder if he was beckoning her down that path (his hands gesticulating this, as per AB's testimony) so he could murder her (premeditated) or if he was getting angry with her because she wouldn't go to nb with him, in which case he snapped and murdered her (admittedly, he did have a short fuse & bad temper, and was used to getting his own way . . . and plus they'd been arguing/had a fall out in school earlier that day, so there could have been a lot of pent-up emotions from earlier on, too).

Offline Mr Apples

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5078 on: December 06, 2023, 03:19:37 PM »
LM definitely had guilty knowledge of where Jodi's body lay. It's glaringly obvious. He used Mia to try and deflect his guilt.

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5079 on: December 06, 2023, 03:25:18 PM »
It's interesting that the police suggest, if I interpreted part 2 of SM's testimony correctly, that CM's Maroon Frontera was spotted parked at the NB rd entrance to the RDP @ 1715 on 30.06.03.

One wonders if that time is accurate and who may have been driving the Frontera.

I am a bit skeptical of the veracity of this info, but, at the same time, it's a possibility (it could, of course, have been mere coincidence since CM came home that way from work sometimes??

Maybe the car wasn't parked as such, but merely CM was driving home on NB rd??).

Maybe LM had texted either his mother or brother as soon as he murdered Jodi (ie at 1710ish)  and asked for help in some way (either requesting a lift back to the house or a change of clothes). Such a strange case.

This could turn out to be nothing, like the witness who claimed they saw Jodi Jones being followed by a “stocky man”

On the other hand it could be relevant and the timing could be inaccurate

It will be interesting to read the rest of the trial transcripts

There hasn’t been anything much yet on sadistic killer Luke Mitchell’s other push bike, which was referred to by Gordon D ickie

Alan Turnbull did mention bikes to Corinne Mitchell - who seemed to answer him in a flash when asked about this, as though she knew his question on bikes was coming
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5080 on: December 06, 2023, 03:31:15 PM »
LM must've murdered that girl almost immediately when they entered the woodland strip.

I do wonder if he was beckoning her down that path (his hands gesticulating this, as per AB's testimony) so he could murder her (premeditated)

Did you notice Shane Mitchell’s hands in those photographs of him outside Edinburgh high court?

If you compare a photograph of killer Luke Mitchell’s hands to his brother Shane’s hands you may see the similarity

There’s something about their hands which makes them stand out 
« Last Edit: December 06, 2023, 03:44:59 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5081 on: December 06, 2023, 03:54:50 PM »
Michelle Moore
@michellesings
I found it interesting that they redacted the FBI's testimony. I asked around about that one agent in particular and heard from reliable sources he's always spot on.
6:01 AM · Dec 6, 2023
https://twitter.com/michellesings/status/1732279144392860044


Several comments from Michelle Moore here
👇
https://m.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=89&v=eP2t4XmT3Bk&embeds_referring_euri=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2F&source_ve_path=Mjg2NjY&feature=emb_logo
« Last Edit: December 06, 2023, 03:59:51 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Mr Apples

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5082 on: December 06, 2023, 04:02:34 PM »
Did you notice Shane Mitchell’s hands in those photographs of him outside Edinburgh high court?

If you compare a photograph of killer Luke Mitchell’s hands to his brother Shane’s hands you may see the similarity

There’s something about their hands which makes them stand out

Yeah, good point. Has anyone on here ever actually seen SM in the flesh? The only thing I've ever seen of him is that footage of him with his hood covering his face and head, entering Edinburgh high court. Do the Mitchell brothers like the 'hooded monk' look? Did LM copy his older brother? Try and emulate his image and hobbies (ie, a huge.knife collection)? Did you notice during the Devil's Own bbc doco from 2007 footage of LM outside the Edinburgh High Court wearing his replacement german parka and flicking his hair away from his face just like F&W said he did as they drove past him on NB rd??


Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5083 on: December 06, 2023, 04:09:07 PM »
LM must've murdered that girl almost immediately when they entered the woodland strip. I do wonder if he was beckoning her down that path (his hands gesticulating this, as per AB's testimony) so he could murder her (premeditated) or if he was getting angry with her because she wouldn't go to nb with him, in which case he snapped and murdered her (admittedly, he did have a short fuse & bad temper, and was used to getting his own way . . . and plus they'd been arguing/had a fall out in school earlier that day, so there could have been a lot of pent-up emotions from earlier on, too).

Sadistic murderer Luke Mitchell appears to have fantasised about murder. He made a comment out loud about this

There is also the fact he had previously threatened girls with knives, one in the weeks leading up to when he committed his murder
« Last Edit: December 06, 2023, 04:11:50 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: "Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean
« Reply #5084 on: December 06, 2023, 04:26:56 PM »
Donna Easton has done another video

Christopher John Halkides
The narrator of the YouTube video clearly leans toward the view that the search trio did not change their statements. Setting aside for a moment the truth of that assertion, does it not follow that Mr Turnbull's summary was deliberately misleading? That is a question that should have been addressed in the linked video.

AJ Az
Christopher John Halkides I agree that Mr Turnbull's summary was misleading, yes. Can we say that the trio changed their stories, if there was no evidence of Jodi's gran changing anything (in regards to the dog)?

Christopher John Halkides
[Name removed] said words to the effect, "Maybe I did not say it correctly; maybe the police took it down wrong," with respect to whether everyone was in hysterics. Beyond that, I struggle to find exactly the right words. They failed to affirm their statements regarding Mia's actions in a robust way.
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation