"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

Alan Turnbull: Had you tried to help the police in the conduct of that inquiry

Corinne Mitchell: I have helped them with everything

Alan Turnbull: Okay. For example you would be honest with them I take it?

Corinne Mitchell: Yes

Alan Turnbull: Have you ever tried to deliberately mislead them

Corinne Mitchell:  No

Alan Turnbull: Okay, there would be no need to do that I take it?

Corinne Mitchell: No there is not

Alan Turnbull: Okay. And you’ll understand of course that the inquiry that they were conducting was into a matter that just couldn’t be more serious?

Corinne Mitchell: Yes I know 

 

[James_Easton]

SHANE MITCHELL'S EVIDENCE

Perhaps the actual trial transcripts evidence, as continually taken in, are proving to be factually insightful?

If only we were not assured, by Sandra Lean, for many years and citing archaic Scots Law, we could not see these?

https://www.facebook.com/groups/594743596079701/permalink/602880938599300/

[Nicholas]

Perhaps the actual trial transcripts evidence, as continually taken in, are proving to be factually insightful?

If only we were not assured, by Sandra Lean, for many years and citing archaic Scots Law, we could not see these?

On page 378 of scammer Sandra Lean’s 2nd innocence fraud book it states “Profits from this book are being donated to” - an organisation that does NOT exist!

Was this not a red flag?

[Nicholas]

Perhaps the actual trial transcripts evidence, as continually taken in, are proving to be factually insightful?

If only we were not assured, by Sandra Lean, for many years and citing archaic Scots Law, we could not see these?

https://www.facebook.com/groups/594743596079701/permalink/602880938599300/

You stated:

“How could Sandra Lean, if actually having a copy of the trial transcripts, publish such a fundamentally, erroneous summation?”

Scammer Sandra Lean did the same with all of the 7 murderers she wrote about in her first Innocence Fraud book - published in 2007

This book was re-published in 2008 by convicted criminal and bogus “dr” Stephen T Manning/checkpoint press (look him up)

In 2014 Sandra Lean said she would be withdrawing this book (No Smoke)

She was asked in 2017 why she hadn’t withdrawn or revised her book due to the bare faced lies contained within its pages.

Then in October 2018 Sandra Lean referred to her first Innocence Fraud book in her 2nd innocence fraud book

It wasn’t until October 2019 that scammer Sandra Lean said she had apparently contacted convicted criminal Steven T Manning to have him withdraw her first fraudulent book

Her reason being “one type” 🙄 (all documented)

Charlatan Sandra Lean’s Innocence Fraud book No Smoke was still being sold in December 2022

[Nicholas]

Corinne Mitchell transcript 13/01/2005 (Day one of two)
👇
https://lukemitchelltrialtranscripts.blogspot.com/2023/12/corinne-mitchell-transcript-12012005.html

Looks like it was Philip Mitchell who appears to have bought his killer son Luke Mitchell the Jack Pyke skunting knife and leather pouch for Christmas 2002

What did Philip Mitchell and his wife tell police about this when they were questioned?

And was Philip Mitchell involved in hiding the replacement skunting knife for his son, when the police arrested them all in April 2004?

[Nicholas]

And was Philip Mitchell involved in hiding the replacement skunting knife for his son, when the police arrested them all in April 2004?

Or was it Ruby or Des Guetta or possibly the man Corinne Mitchell was with on Saturday the 28th June 2003?

What about this Mr Fuller character?

Why haven’t we heard of Mr Fuller before?

[Nicholas]

Corinne Mitchell: On April 14th my head was mince

Corinne Mitchell: I hadn’t read that part

 

Corinne Mitchell: I’d forgotten about a lot of things

 

Has Corinne Mitchell ever been diagnosed with an anti-social personality disorder?

[Chris_Halkides]

in 2021 Jane Hamilton wrote, "In Mitchell's case, this was over 40 days..."  From what I have read the jury took 5 hours before rendering a verdict, something not mentioned. In a 2021 article criticizing the documentary, she discussed a knife pouch without indicating that this knife was too small to account for the injuries.  It is worth paying to read someone whose articles are well-researched and objective, but...

[Mr Apples]

I'm having a cup of coffee and reading through CM's trial transcripts . . . painful reading. I'm at the part where AT is cross-examining her on the skunting knife bought from a catalogue in Leeds in Dec' '03 and it's as plain as day she's lying; AT knew it and did a good job of exposing her lies, asking her uncomfortable questions & not allowing her to give vague answers (ie, he needed the skunting knife to cut 'things' whilst on these wild camping excursions that cleary never happened, nor were likely to ever happen). It just seems the same as SM's testimony but even more of a debacle.

[Nicholas]

I'm having a cup of coffee and reading through CM's trial transcripts . . . painful reading. I'm at the part where AT is cross-examining her on the skunting knife bought from a catalogue in Leeds in Dec' '03 and it's as plain as day she's lying; AT knew it and did a good job of exposing her lies, asking her uncomfortable questions & not allowing her to give vague answers (ie, he needed the skunting knife to cut 'things' whilst on these wild camping excursions that cleary never happened, nor were likely to ever happen). It just seems the same as SM's testimony but even more of a debacle.

The details regarding killer Luke Mitchell’s visit to see Kimberley T in Kenmore on the 5th July 2003 were interesting

It appears Corinne Mitchell’s boyfriend Mr Fuller was due to drive the three of them to Kenmore but he received a text message from Corinne Mitchell, after her son had committed his murder, telling Mr Fuller the trip was “off”


Alan Turnbull: And I return to the question I’m interested in, which is whether or not you knew that Luke was on the phone for a number of hours to Kimberley that night?

Corinne Mitchell: Well I was out most of the night

Alan Turnbull: Yes. But I’m talking about after you came back, into the early hours of the morning, for example into after midnight and past 1 O’clock?

Corinne Mitchell: I can’t remember Luke bing in the phone

Alan Turnbull: Did you not discuss the fact that he was in the phone to another girlfriend with Mr Fuller?

Corinne Mitchell: I may have done, I don’t know. I cannot remember that happening

Alan Turnbull: Of course by te time of this weekend, by the time of those telephone calls,  Luke had been going out with Jodi for a number of months

Corinne Mitchell: Yes

Alan Turnbull: Did Jodi know who Kimberley was?

Corinne Mitchell: Sorry

Alan Thomson: Did Jodi know who Kimberley was?

Corinne Mitchell: I don’t know, I don’t think she did   

 

[Nicholas]

I'm having a cup of coffee and reading through CM's trial transcripts . . . painful reading.

The brocolli story was abysmal too

[Nicholas]

I'm having a cup of coffee and reading through CM's trial transcripts . . . painful reading

What also stands out is the fact the only thing Corinne Mitchell was able to remember well for the jury, was the trio’s concocted story about that meal

That concocted story of going out to sit on the wall at the end of the street waiting for Jodi Jones was see through too

 

Jodi Jones was banned from walking that path alone

Killer Luke Mitchell knew this

Corinne Mitchell knew this too

[Parky41]

in 2021 Jane Hamilton wrote, "In Mitchell's case, this was over 40 days..."  From what I have read the jury took 5 hours before rendering a verdict, something not mentioned. In a 2021 article criticizing the documentary, she discussed a knife pouch without indicating that this knife was too small to account for the injuries.  It is worth paying to read someone whose articles are well-researched and objective, but...

A lock knife, a 4 inch blade doubling in length. Skunting knife. Used for hunting, camping and survival. What do you imagine such a knife does when being used for hunting? Think of a surgeon and a scalpel used in surgery? The size, the type surgery they are used for, wide and varied. It is fallacy applying that the size of knife was not capable of such injuries.

Used to also deflect from the absolute fact he had one pre-murder, that it disappeared. There is no, what does it matter, it couldn't have caused those injuries (when it most certainly could), it matters a great deal. But yes, it is worth being able to be objective.

[Kenmair]

The brocolli story was abysmal too

It was an absolute car crash. If the jury weren't already convinced, they would be by that dogs breakfast of a testimony. More holes in it than a tattie masher and can't see how anyone could defend that.

I think she was the last witness on the stand too if I recall.

[Nicholas]

A lock knife, a 4 inch blade doubling in length. Skunting knife. Used for hunting, camping and survival. What do you imagine such a knife does when being used for hunting? Think of a surgeon and a scalpel used in surgery? The size, the type surgery they are used for, wide and varied. It is fallacy applying that the size of knife was not capable of such injuries.

Used to also deflect from the absolute fact he had one pre-murder, that it disappeared. There is no, what does it matter, it couldn't have caused those injuries (when it most certainly could), it matters a great deal. But yes, it is worth being able to be objective.

It will be interesting to see if Alan Turnbull referred to any of Philip Mitchell and his wife’s (killer Luke Mitchell’s step-mother) witness statements durung the trial on the knife situation

Corinne Mitchell was clearly shifting the blame onto Philip Mitchell regarding the missing Jack Pyke skunting knife, which appears to have been a 2002 Christmas present