Author Topic: Another view of dog evidence  (Read 54159 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

registrar

  • Guest
Re: Another view of dog evidence
« Reply #180 on: April 19, 2013, 12:09:14 AM »
Registrar pls provide evidence that eddie has ever alerted to a vegetable when he is trained to alert to dead human bodies, its not rocket science

A coconut dearest, is a seed or a fruit - NOT a vegetable - and certainly not part of a human skull

« Last Edit: April 19, 2013, 06:43:48 PM by John »

debunker

  • Guest
Re: Another view of dog evidence
« Reply #181 on: April 19, 2013, 09:15:30 AM »
Registrar pls provide evidence that eddie has ever alerted to a vegetable when he is trained to alert to dead human bodies, its not rocket science

Produce ANYTHING apart from Mr Grime´s claims that Eddie reacts correctly to cadaver scent or blood.

Offline Carana

Re: Another view of dog evidence
« Reply #182 on: April 19, 2013, 09:23:01 AM »
Eddie alerted. Humans had a look to see what he barked at. They found what they thought to be a piece of skull, and assumed that that was he was alerting to. It was the humans who got it wrong.

A likely explanation, in my view, is that the coconut fragment was part of a meal and got chucked out along with the rest of the meal. If that meal contained pork, he could have been reacting to decomposed meat.

Poor old Eddie could hardly explain "Noooo, not the coconut...."

Offline John

Re: Another view of dog evidence
« Reply #183 on: April 19, 2013, 06:30:23 PM »
Prout said he killed her in the building outside, then put her body in the car and went in the car to a pub, with the body in the car still.

So he had a curtain prepared in the car to wrap her up in? Rather than sneek her body back in the house and use a curtain to do so? pls do cite now the report where he killed her in an outbuilding, cheers, and you DO realise dont you that even if he personally didnt bring her body into the living room HE may have contaminated it with HER death scent? Food for thought before you run off and say Eddie is useless

I caught your comment in passing Redblossom and I too was corrected on this just last week.  Here is the discussion and the links.  Apparently he murdered her in the shooting lodge and wrapped her in one of its curtains.

He put her body in the back of the Land Rover but whether he took it or another vehicle to the pub is still debatable.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1112.msg31414#msg31414
« Last Edit: April 19, 2013, 06:42:16 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Another view of dog evidence
« Reply #184 on: April 19, 2013, 06:40:22 PM »
Thanks John.


Offline John

Re: Another view of dog evidence
« Reply #185 on: April 19, 2013, 06:42:56 PM »
Always glad to help  8(0(*
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.