What's Significant About LM Finding J J?

[Paranoid Android]

Of course it doesn’t mean that he didn’t but it makes it less likely that any resulting trial will be fair. Surely even you can appreciate that?

How does the police making mistakes entail the trial being unfair?

And why even me?

[faithlilly]

How does the police making mistakes entail the trial being unfair?

And why even me?

Really?

You truly can’t see why an incompetent investigation would make any trial stemming from it unfair? .

[Paranoid Android]

Really?

You truly can’t see why an incompetent investigation would make any trial stemming from it unfair? .

Like I've said to you before, you don't understand logic.

The one thing doesn't necessarily entail the other.

In formal terms, your premise doesn't necessarily entail your conclusion without an appropriate quantifier. 

Why even me?

[faithlilly]

Like I've said to you before, you don't understand logic.

The one thing doesn't necessarily entail the other.

In formal terms, your premise doesn't necessarily entail your conclusion without an appropriate quantifier. 

Why even me?

I’m afraid it’s you who doesn’t understand logic.

If a body is left uncovered in the pouring rain who can possibly say how much important forensic material will be lost as a result? Forensic material that could suggest another perpetrator.

Beyond reasonable doubt is the judicial standard…botched forensics logically should implant doubt.

Would you be happy if one of your family had been convicted of a serious crime in such circumstances?

[Paranoid Android]

I’m afraid it’s you who doesn’t understand logic.

If a body is left uncovered in the pouring rain who can possibly say how much important forensic material will be lost as a result? Forensic material that could suggest another perpetrator.

Beyond reasonable doubt is the judicial standard…botched forensics logically should implant doubt.

Would you be happy if one of your family had been convicted of a serious crime in such circumstances?

I don't think you know what logic is.

None of my family had been convicted of a serious crime in any circumstances.

[faithlilly]

I don't think you know what logic is.

None of my family had been convicted of a serious crime in any circumstances.

I notice you didn’t address the actual points in my post. This seems to be a particular habit of yours. Insults are no substitute for reasoned debate but I’m sure even you know that.

And I am truly glad that none of your family have had to endure a miscarriage of justice…yet.

[rulesapply]

I’m afraid it’s you who doesn’t understand logic.

If a body is left uncovered in the pouring rain who can possibly say how much important forensic material will be lost as a result? Forensic material that could suggest another perpetrator.

Beyond reasonable doubt is the judicial standard…botched forensics logically should implant doubt.

Would you be happy if one of your family had been convicted of a serious crime in such circumstances?

Genuine question. What do you know about the forensics being botched and how do you know? Do you have proof or a cite of the "several " members of the jury who didn't think LM was guilty? That was part of one of your previous posts. I meant  to ask you previously. It's your proof of numbers I'm interested in. If you don't have a cite, that's how misinformation can be started.

[rulesapply]

I notice you didn’t address the actual points in my post. This seems to be a particular habit of yours. Insults are no substitute for reasoned debate but I’m sure even you know that.

And I am truly glad that none of your family have had to endure a miscarriage of justice…yet.

Yet? SMH.

[faithlilly]

Yet? SMH.

What do you think ‘yer’ means in the context of my post?

[Paranoid Android]

I notice you didn’t address the actual points in my post. This seems to be a particular habit of yours. Insults are no substitute for reasoned debate but I’m sure even you know that.

And I am truly glad that none of your family have had to endure a miscarriage of justice…yet.

No-one is obliged to answer your questions.

If you'd care to point out where I've insulted anyone, either report it to Moderators, or kindly direct me to the alleged insults.

[faithlilly]

No-one is obliged to answer your questions.

If you'd care to point out where I've insulted anyone, either report it to Moderators, or kindly direct me to the alleged insults.

Of course no one is obliged to answer any of my questions but when you don’t it does make for a rather one-sided discussion as well as reminding me of the much used, at least by myself, quote attributed to Mark Twain “It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to talk and remove all doubt.”

[rulesapply]

Of course no one is obliged to answer any of my questions but when you don’t it does make for a rather one-sided discussion as well as reminding me of the much used, at least by myself, quote attributed to Mark Twain “It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to talk and remove all doubt.”

What about when you don't answer questions? Are you somehow exempt? I asked you before, Do you have a cite of the "several" jury members? Do you know who was or wasn't given permission to video record inside the church? You have answered less than anyone else and yet you want answers from others?  You won't answer and I doubt very much that anyone expects a straight answer to either question. I certainly know I'm not getting one.

[rulesapply]

Of course no one is obliged to answer any of my questions but when you don’t it does make for a rather one-sided discussion as well as reminding me of the much used, at least by myself, quote attributed to Mark Twain “It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to talk and remove all doubt.”

Oh, quotes! Maybe the replies you don't hear are because no one can be bothered with your question dodging and your relentless nonsense. Just that! Nothing as clever as Twain, just that no one wants to communicate with you anymore? I'd certainly rather communicate with Twain. The trouble with you talking, you don't remove all doubt. In fact, you don't answer any questions. You increase doubt.

[faithlilly]

Oh, quotes! Maybe the replies you don't hear are because no one can be bothered with your question dodging and your relentless nonsense. Just that! Nothing as clever as Twain, just that no one wants to communicate with you anymore? I'd certainly rather communicate with Twain. The trouble with you talking, you don't remove all doubt. In fact, you don't answer any questions. You increase doubt.

.

Sigh !

[rulesapply]

.

Sigh !

Exactly how I feel when I see the quotes of other people.  Good night, faithlilly.