Does Wolters have photographic evidence?

[Angelo222]

That depends on what you think is 'abduction evidence'. As at June 2020 they had no evidence placing CB in PdL on the evening of May 3rd 2007. They had evidence that a PAYE phone they believed was his was there, but not that he was using it at the time. Their appeal to the owner/user of the caller's phone was so they could ask him/her who they actually spoke to.

So Wolters is grasping at straws basically?

[G-Unit]

So Wolters is grasping at straws basically?

That was a while ago, so he may have more information by now, but at the time he went public he didn't have definitive evidence of CB being near to Madeleine before she disappeared. If he has evidence of CB being with her after her disappearance that doesn't amount to evidence that he abducted her from apartment 5A imo.

[barrier]

Madeleine's parents have stated publicly that their child could be still alive which puts Wolters claims in the stupid box imo.

Or the McCann's, they can't both be right, does one believe the parents or the police.

[Eleanor]

I can hardly believe I'm reading some of this.

[Mr Gray]

That depends on what you think is 'abduction evidence'. As at June 2020 they had no evidence placing CB in PdL on the evening of May 3rd 2007. They had evidence that a PAYE phone they believed was his was there, but not that he was using it at the time. Their appeal to the owner/user of the caller's phone was so they could ask him/her who they actually spoke to.

What I think is abduction evidence is a photo of Maddie being abused by persons unknown
As in the Rui Pedro case

[barrier]

That was a while ago, so he may have more information by now, but at the time he went public he didn't have definitive evidence of CB being near to Madeleine before she disappeared. If he has evidence of CB being with her after her disappearance that doesn't amount to evidence that he abducted her from apartment 5A imo.

He's never claimed abduction from 5a, either its Angelo's theory of the girl waking and wandering or it's my outrageous one, we'll see. imo.

[barrier]

I can hardly believe I'm reading some of this.

Don't then, but what do you conclude from the arguments in favour of Wolters.

[Mr Gray]

Madeleine's parents have stated publicly that their child could be still alive which puts Wolters claims in the stupid box imo.

You are quite wrong.  The McCanns have said they will not accept Maddie is dead without incontrovertible proof... Wolters has said he does not have that... No disagreement whatsoever

[Mr Gray]

That was a while ago, so he may have more information by now, but at the time he went public he didn't have definitive evidence of CB being near to Madeleine before she disappeared. If he has evidence of CB being with her after her disappearance that doesn't amount to evidence that he abducted her from apartment 5A imo.

I'm claiming evidence of abduction.. Not evidence of abduction by CB

[Mr Gray]

That was a while ago, so he may have more information by now, but at the time he went public he didn't have definitive evidence of CB being near to Madeleine before she disappeared. If he has evidence of CB being with her after her disappearance that doesn't amount to evidence that he abducted her from apartment 5A imo.

It's evidence that someone abducted her

[barrier]

You are quite wrong.  The McCanns have said they will not accept Maddie is dead without incontrovertible proof... Wolters has said he does not have that... No disagreement whatsoever

So despite arguing for 11 months Wolters has concrete evidence, you accept he's hasn't.

[Wonderfulspam]

I'm claiming evidence of abduction.. Not evidence of abduction by CB

Well then, the onus is on you to present it.

[Mr Gray]

So despite arguing for 11 months Wolters has concrete evidence, you accept he's hasn't.

Concrete evidence is not have incontrovertible proof.
If you had listened to what Wolters has said you would understand this

[Mr Gray]

Well then, the onus is on you to present it.

No it isn't... Read the thread

[jassi]

So despite arguing for 11 months Wolters has concrete evidence, you accept he's hasn't.

Did he ever specify what he had concrete evidence of ?