Does Wolters have photographic evidence?

[Eleanor]

Don't then, but what do you conclude from the arguments in favour of Wolters.

Unfortunately I am obliged to read it.

I haven't concluded anything from Wolter's arguments.

[G-Unit]

What I think is abduction evidence is a photo of Maddie being abused by persons unknown
As in the Rui Pedro case

Claiming that is a bit of an imaginative leap imo. You have, after all, no evidence that such a photo exists.

[Mr Gray]

Did he ever specify what he had concrete evidence of ?

Yes he did

[Mr Gray]

Claiming that is a bit of an imaginative leap imo. You have, after all, no evidence that such a photo exists.

I do have evidence it exists... The problem is you don't seem to understand the meaning of the word evidence

[barrier]

Did he ever specify what he had concrete evidence of ?

Various reports had him saying he had concrete evidence the girl was dead and writing to the McCann's to that effect.

[Eleanor]

I do have evidence it exists... The problem is you don't seem to understand the meaning of the word evidence

It suits them not to understand.

[Mr Gray]

Various reports had him saying he had concrete evidence the girl was dead and writing to the McCann's to that effect.

He has actually stated.. Live on air and in English... Quite a lot more than that.  What you and others show is you are not really up to speed as to what he has claimed... Yet you want to pontificate about it

[Brietta]

Unfortunately I am obliged to read it.

I haven't concluded anything from Volter's arguments.

I find much of it mindbogglingly boring in its contrived obtuseness (or maybe I'm being kind in assuming it is contrived and not for real).

I've decided that it is all a plot to drive those of us who must read it even further down the road to insanity than we already are ❤

[Vertigo Swirl]

Agreed - this is one of those utterly pointless arguments - no one knows precisely what the German authorities do or don't have.  They are confident they have something significant, and I find that reason enough to believe they may have, but i can't be sure it isn't a bluff also.  If and when it is revealed they never had anything then that IMO is the time to pour scorn on them, until then it's best to simply wait and see and not be so intent on pretending you know everything about everything, you might end up looking foolish. 

[G-Unit]

I do have evidence it exists... The problem is you don't seem to understand the meaning of the word evidence

Imo cherry-picking some quotes and inventing a theory around them isn't evidence, it's speculation.

[Eleanor]

Imo cherry-picking some quotes and inventing a theory around them isn't evidence, it's speculation.

Funny you should say that.  I was about to say the same thing.

[Holly Goodhead]

Agreed - this is one of those utterly pointless arguments - no one knows precisely what the German authorities do or don't have.  They are confident they have something significant, and I find that reason enough to believe they may have, but i can't be sure it isn't a bluff also.  If and when it is revealed they never had anything then that IMO is the time to pour scorn on them, until then it's best to simply wait and see and not be so intent on pretending you know everything about everything, you might end up looking foolish.

I don't believe BKA have anything, but if I assume for a moment I'm wrong and they do indeed have something then why the need for HCW to make the statements we are all familiar with?  Why the need for what appears to be a fishing expedition instead of just quietly building a case behind the scenes?

Neither the BKA or HCW named CB, as per German privacy laws, and yet divulged enough info to allow the media to identify which imo is somewhat underhanded. 

BKA has very recently arrested three men and a fourth is being held in Paraguay for allegedly running one of the world's biggest online networks for sharing images of child sex abuse.  And yet no identifying info has been revealed:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-56969414

Some 3 years ago a German couple were found guilty of child sex abuse and again no identifying info was made available in accordance with German privacy law:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-45096183

Why is the case of MM being treated differently?  Is the public prosecutor getting off on the attention the case attracts?

[Mr Gray]

Imo cherry-picking some quotes and inventing a theory around them isn't evidence, it's speculation.

Wolters statements are evidence...you should understand that

Wolters has now said his evidence may be photographic so what do you imagine Im inventing. its quite coincidental that I made my statement before wolters admitted the evidence may be photographic

[Eleanor]

Wolters statements are evidence...you should understand that

Wolters has now said his evidence may be photographic so what do you imagine Im inventing. its quite coincidental that I made my statement before wolters admitted the evidence may be photographic

Yes, you did actually.

[Angelo222]

Wolters statements are evidence...you should understand that

Wolters has now said his evidence may be photographic so what do you imagine Im inventing. its quite coincidental that I made my statement before wolters admitted the evidence may be photographic

Such nonsense 

Christian Bruckner has no history of infanticide. He is a sex deviant who preyed on the vulnerable but murder is something else.