Author Topic: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?  (Read 55179 times)

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #330 on: May 03, 2021, 02:42:44 PM »
Such nonsense  @)(++(*

Christian Bruckner has no history of infanticide. He is a sex deviant who preyed on the vulnerable but murder is something else.

Perhaps he murdered his dog.  Murderers often start with animals.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #331 on: May 03, 2021, 02:52:51 PM »
Such nonsense  @)(++(*

Christian Bruckner has no history of infanticide. He is a sex deviant who preyed on the vulnerable but murder is something else.

Perhaps you could tell me what history Ian Huntley had of murder... With logic like yours no first time murderers would be arrested
Looks like the nonsense is coming from you
« Last Edit: May 03, 2021, 03:02:21 PM by Davel »

Offline jassi

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #332 on: May 03, 2021, 02:53:23 PM »
I don't believe BKA have anything, but if I assume for a moment I'm wrong and they do indeed have something then why the need for HCW to make the statements we are all familiar with?  Why the need for what appears to be a fishing expedition instead of just quietly building a case behind the scenes?

Neither the BKA or HCW named CB, as per German privacy laws, and yet divulged enough info to allow the media to identify which imo is somewhat underhanded. 

BKA has very recently arrested three men and a fourth is being held in Paraguay for allegedly running one of the world's biggest online networks for sharing images of child sex abuse.  And yet no identifying info has been revealed:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-56969414

Some 3 years ago a German couple were found guilty of child sex abuse and again no identifying info was made available in accordance with German privacy law:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-45096183

Why is the case of MM being treated differently?  Is the public prosecutor getting off on the attention the case attracts?

I think he misjudged the situation and the amount of media attention it would attract.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #333 on: May 03, 2021, 03:04:20 PM »
I think he misjudged the situation and the amount of media attention it would attract.

We were told the PJ had ruled out CN from the Behan rape... Noe it looks like the Germans msy charge him... Do you think they've misjudged that too

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #334 on: May 03, 2021, 03:04:22 PM »
I don't believe BKA have anything, but if I assume for a moment I'm wrong and they do indeed have something then why the need for HCW to make the statements we are all familiar with?  Why the need for what appears to be a fishing expedition instead of just quietly building a case behind the scenes?

Neither the BKA or HCW named CB, as per German privacy laws, and yet divulged enough info to allow the media to identify which imo is somewhat underhanded. 

BKA has very recently arrested three men and a fourth is being held in Paraguay for allegedly running one of the world's biggest online networks for sharing images of child sex abuse.  And yet no identifying info has been revealed:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-56969414

Some 3 years ago a German couple were found guilty of child sex abuse and again no identifying info was made available in accordance with German privacy law:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-45096183

Why is the case of MM being treated differently?  Is the public prosecutor getting off on the attention the case attracts?
”Getting off on”?  What, do you mean sexually?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #335 on: May 03, 2021, 03:05:41 PM »
Such nonsense  @)(++(*

Christian Bruckner has no history of infanticide. He is a sex deviant who preyed on the vulnerable but murder is something else.
Are you saying there is no chance whatsoever that a paedophile/ rapist could ever murder a child?  On what basis do you arrive at this conclusion?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #336 on: May 03, 2021, 03:23:46 PM »

What to say?

It's not Infanticide to murder a four year old.

And it isn't funny.

Offline barrier

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #337 on: May 03, 2021, 03:33:10 PM »
We were told the PJ had ruled out CN from the Behan rape... Noe it looks like the Germans msy charge him... Do you think they've misjudged that too

For one who in the past is sceptical about press reports, you now appear to think its a given what they say.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #338 on: May 03, 2021, 03:37:25 PM »
For one who in the past is sceptical about press reports, you now appear to think its a given what they say.

Please read the post properly... I said MAY charge.. That is not a given

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #339 on: May 03, 2021, 03:46:06 PM »
”Getting off on”?  What, do you mean sexually?

Enjoying the attention.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline barrier

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #340 on: May 03, 2021, 03:47:30 PM »
I don't believe BKA have anything, but if I assume for a moment I'm wrong and they do indeed have something then why the need for HCW to make the statements we are all familiar with?  Why the need for what appears to be a fishing expedition instead of just quietly building a case behind the scenes?

Neither the BKA or HCW named CB, as per German privacy laws, and yet divulged enough info to allow the media to identify which imo is somewhat underhanded. 

BKA has very recently arrested three men and a fourth is being held in Paraguay for allegedly running one of the world's biggest online networks for sharing images of child sex abuse.  And yet no identifying info has been revealed:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-56969414

Some 3 years ago a German couple were found guilty of child sex abuse and again no identifying info was made available in accordance with German privacy law:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-45096183

Why is the case of MM being treated differently?  Is the public prosecutor getting off on the attention the case attracts?


Arguably the most high profile mystery disappearance in recent times, what kudos it would be to solve it.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Angelo222

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #341 on: May 03, 2021, 03:48:51 PM »
Perhaps you could tell me what history Ian Huntley had of murder... With logic like yours no first time murderers would be arrested
Looks like the nonsense is coming from you

Bruckner's offending has been exposed for all to see but not once did he come anywhere near murder. I think you and Wolters need to go back to basics.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Angelo222

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #342 on: May 03, 2021, 03:50:25 PM »
Are you saying there is no chance whatsoever that a paedophile/ rapist could ever murder a child?  On what basis do you arrive at this conclusion?

No, not no chance but merely a slim one. Rapists and murderers are two different animals usually.  If Maddie was abducted for financial gain then harming her was not to his advantage. It would have been in his interest to keep her alive and unharmed.

I repeat, Bruckner was a sex offender, he was not a murderer.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2021, 03:53:51 PM by Angelo222 »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #343 on: May 03, 2021, 03:56:25 PM »
Bruckner's offending has been exposed for all to see but not once did he come anywhere near murder. I think you and Wolters need to go back to basics.

It's you who is posting nonsense... Ian Huntley had no history of murder... Same as countless other first time offenders.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #344 on: May 03, 2021, 05:14:04 PM »
No, not no chance but merely a slim one. Rapists and murderers are two different animals usually.  If Maddie was abducted for financial gain then harming her was not to his advantage. It would have been in his interest to keep her alive and unharmed.

I repeat, Bruckner was a sex offender, he was not a murderer.
I would venture that pretty much all sexually motivated murders of women and children are perpetrated by sex offenders. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".