Author Topic: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?  (Read 44386 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #435 on: May 24, 2021, 12:18:50 PM »
The problem seems to be, in this context concrete could mean anything, who knows? I certainly don’t.

But, Mr Neville added, some developments were getting lost in translation.
“We can only hope she is still alive, but I think there is a real confusion about the phrase of the Germans used, concrete evidence,” he told Sunrise.
“In Britain and probably Australia, that means there is absolutely top drawer evidence, fingerprints, DNA, CCTV and alike.
“In Germany, however, it generally means it is something tangible, not just a rumour.
“In Britain you would charge someone with concrete evidence, but in Germany, you may not even arrest them. I do think we got the wrong end of the stick sometimes with this difference in translation.”


https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/investigator-on-hitech-methods-that-could-be-used-to-find-maddie-mccann/news-story/e5d6b501a8b205b73ce9fe1c50a76529

What makes you think Neville knows anything...

Offline kizzy

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #436 on: May 24, 2021, 12:21:05 PM »
What makes you think Neville knows anything...

Probably could say the same about wolt.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #437 on: May 24, 2021, 12:36:00 PM »
Probably could say the same about wolt.

Not a very smart post.. Imo
Wolts leading the german investigation.. Neville is a retired detective

Offline kizzy

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #438 on: May 24, 2021, 01:08:28 PM »
Not a very smart post.. Imo
Wolts leading the german investigation.. Neville is a retired detective

Well ditto....I dont think your posts are very smart either.

Hanging on to wolts every word.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #439 on: May 24, 2021, 01:28:28 PM »
What makes you think Neville knows anything...

Concrete evidence = Konkrete bewise in German. Which isn't always translated as 'concrete'. It can be translated as;

actual evidence
factual evidence
physical evidence
hard evidence
particular evidence
strong evidence

It depends, as Neville said, on the context.
https://www.linguee.com/german-english/translation/konkrete+beweise.html
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #440 on: May 24, 2021, 03:28:12 PM »
Well ditto....I dont think your posts are very smart either.

Hanging on to wolts every word.

You obviously don't understand my logic... Whereas I do understand yours

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #441 on: May 24, 2021, 03:31:08 PM »
Concrete evidence = Konkrete bewise in German. Which isn't always translated as 'concrete'. It can be translated as;

actual evidence
factual evidence
physical evidence
hard evidence
particular evidence
strong evidence

It depends, as Neville said, on the context.
https://www.linguee.com/german-english/translation/konkrete+beweise.html

All those definitions are quite strong..
Wolters has said that anyone who saw the evidence he has would agree with his conclusions... I wonder how much Neville knows. His knowledge of Wolters statements could be quite weak for all we know

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #442 on: May 24, 2021, 04:04:59 PM »
Many here have pointed out that some of the material in T9 wit stats was 'lost' in translation so why not with HCW?
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #443 on: May 24, 2021, 04:06:11 PM »
If HCW has it all sewn up it surely begs the question why OG requires further funding?
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #444 on: May 24, 2021, 04:12:29 PM »
Many here have pointed out that some of the material in T9 wit stats was 'lost' in translation so why not with HCW?

Because HCW has spoken in English.... Plus when he has spoken in German his words are on record. We have no record of the English used by the McCanns

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #445 on: May 24, 2021, 04:48:34 PM »
Because HCW has spoken in English.... Plus when he has spoken in German his words are on record. We have no record of the English used by the McCanns

But we know he isn't bilingual from the short clip here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZyYoCyHeBY
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #446 on: May 24, 2021, 04:58:39 PM »
But we know he isn't bilingual from the short clip here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZyYoCyHeBY

Based on everything HCW has said... And the context he has said it in... I'm convinced he has significant evidence... And most probably proof MM is dead

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #447 on: May 24, 2021, 05:21:02 PM »
Many here have pointed out that some of the material in T9 wit stats was 'lost' in translation so why not with HCW?
His words were spoken in English, recorded in English and broadcast in English.  How is that comparable to statements given in English, written down, translated into Portuguese and then translated back into English?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #448 on: May 24, 2021, 06:07:23 PM »
Based on everything HCW has said... And the context he has said it in... I'm convinced he has significant evidence... And most probably proof MM is dead

I would be more convinced if we heard from BKA, who afterall would have been responsible for gathering the "significant evidence" you refer to, but not a word!?
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Does Wolters have photographic evidence?
« Reply #449 on: May 24, 2021, 06:09:52 PM »
I would be more convinced if we heard from BKA, who afterall would have been responsible for gathering the "significant evidence" you refer to, but not a word!?

It seems to me Wolters is the spokesman. It's not me referring to the evidence... Its Wolters