maddie will be 18 this year

[G-Unit]

Do you understand why the original request for reconstitution was refuse, right at the start when there might have been some point?

I wasn't aware that any such request was made. The point was as relevant later as it was initially imo.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I understand why the PJ took the direction they did. I don't understand why those nine 'completely innocent' people shrank from taking the opportunity they were offered to demonstrate during a reconstitution exactly what each of them did on 3rd May.

10 actually.  I think Jez Wilkins was the first to refuse.  Maybe it would help you to understand if you accepted that the sole purpose of the reconstitution was to self incriminate, not to finde Madeleine (which was the only thing those 10 innocent people were interested in, IMO).

[Mr Gray]

10 actually.  I think Jez Wilkins was the first to refuse.  Maybe it would help you to understand if you accepted that the sole purpose of the reconstitution was to self incriminate, not to finde Madeleine (which was the only thing those 10 innocent people were interested in, IMO).

the archiving report was a bit of  a giveaway...the mcCanns lost their chance to prove their innocence.

why should they have to prove their innocence...I  think the PJ wanted to prove their guilt

[Vertigo Swirl]

I understand why the PJ took the direction they did. I don't understand why those nine 'completely innocent' people shrank from taking the opportunity they were offered to demonstrate during a reconstitution exactly what each of them did on 3rd May.

Tell us why the PJ spent only one week physically looking for Madeleine.  Tell us why the police allegedly visited local paedos at their homes and when they were not in never followed it up.  Tell us why a sighting of a man and woman with a child at Lagos Marina in the early hours of 4 th May was never identified but also marked “of no relevance” to the investigation.  Tell us why the Pj failed to secure all and any CCTV  footage in the area.  Now tell me why you understand why the PJ took the direction they did.  Based on what (to use your words) “definitive evidence”? 

[barrier]

Based on exactly what evidence?

Redwood, the child described as being close to that of Madeline, the only one being carried around that fitted that description.Join the dots, it all fits.

[Mr Gray]

Redwood, the child described as being close to that of Madeline, the only one being carried around that fitted that description.Join the dots, it all fits.

So you want to ignore all the other sightings as being false...the fact is taht all these sightings...including smithman...are unrelable

[Vertigo Swirl]

Redwood, the child described as being close to that of Madeline, the only one being carried around that fitted that description.Join the dots, it all fits.

It all fits what?  Certainly not the theory that Gerry disposed of his daughter’s body, unless you believe in a conspiracy to protect him perpetrated by all his holiday group?

[Wonderfulspam]

It all fits what?  Certainly not the theory that Gerry disposed of his daughter’s body, unless you believe in a conspiracy to protect him perpetrated by all his holiday group?

Nope, they wouldn't all have to know.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Nope, they wouldn't all have to know.

Yes they would.

[Eleanor]

Yes they would.

Of course they would.

[jassi]

Of course they would.

Why not just one or two to be 'in the know', with the others just following along ?

[Eleanor]

Why not just one or two to be 'in the know', with the others just following along ?

Would you?

[G-Unit]

10 actually.  I think Jez Wilkins was the first to refuse.  Maybe it would help you to understand if you accepted that the sole purpose of the reconstitution was to self incriminate, not to finde Madeleine (which was the only thing those 10 innocent people were interested in, IMO).

Jes Wilkins would have attended if the others had. Some may believe that the PJ wanted to see the group self incriminate, but that's not what the PJ said. It seems that speculating about the PJ's motives is seen as acceptable, but speculating about the group's motives is seen as nasty and hateful.

[jassi]

Would you?

Why not if I didn't suspect anything ? Friends can be very persuasive

[Eleanor]

Why not if I didn't suspect anything ? Friends can be very persuasive

But what if you did suspect or even know something?