Luke Mitchell and Jodi Jones who got justice the “official” group is it a cult?

[rulesapply]

You, not Mitchell, have been asked that question around the alleged Judge’s direction and you, not Mitchell, have refused consistently to provide a cite to validate you claim and by doing so it is your honesty that is in question at this point, not Mitchell’s.

That horrible defence of what should be indefensible

[faithlilly]

Ah my dearest Faith, whilst I like feisty woman I draw the line at proven liars. When I first started discussion with yourself I admit to being somewhat drawn by your false sense of knowledge in this case. Lots of noise with little substance. The day you decided to blatantly lie, I ditched your credibility in the bin. Where my friend it rightly belongs. I suppose it comes down to trust in source. Of your friends whom you claim you have, to be trusted? The one who verified how long it took to eat a dinner in ten minutes was just the tops!.Fantastic stuff. Well surpassed the Scotmid one ;-)  Perhaps you were lying about your sources? Perhaps that is why you project doubt upon others?

So while you stomp away on your keyboard/phone or whatever method you choose to use. With those somewhat infantile demands. Dear Faith please be advised with only your best interests at heart. Technology these days is expensive, please try not to break anything. Even that proverbial leg with your demands. You made me smile, even chuckle. Thank you.

Faux gratitude…the last refuge of the discredited debater.

Do you really think that by calling me a liar you take any heat at all away from your rather embarrassing inability to provide even a scintilla of evidence for your claim regarding the judge’s direction? You can however redeem yourself, and your credibility, even at this late stage, but providing that most simple of requests, a source for your claim.

The ball is in your court.

[mrswah]

Just a reminder------please do not call other posters liars.

Let's keep the discussion civilised, whatever views we hold re Luke Mitchell.

[rulesapply]

Just a reminder------please do not call other posters liars.

Let's keep the discussion civilised, whatever views we hold re Luke Mitchell.

Am I allowed to post to you?

[Parky41]

Faux gratitude…the last refuge of the discredited debater.

Do you really think that by calling me a liar you take any heat at all away from your rather embarrassing inability to provide even a scintilla of evidence for your claim regarding the judge’s direction? You can however redeem yourself, and your credibility, even at this late stage, but providing that most simple of requests, a source for your claim.

The ball is in your court.

Ah so you got to it prior to Mr Swah removing it. Now now. Are we still playing demand here. You first for we are talking of trust in these sources we have are we not? So we will need your friends name that worked with Scotmid. Their employee status and proof of their time there. Of back up of the claims of how the whole system works, but above all them saying, along with their name that the police were lying, that there was nothing wrong with the till mechanism the day in question. Of how long they keep CCTV if there was any request for it and so forth. - Sound ridiculous?  Or you could simply prove the word of my source to be wrong. I'm absolutely fine with that. Ask a friend? If not Mitchell himself. Of the direction in those case notes. It should be there, word for word. 

Of this copy cat "ball in your court" game. I've said it before to you and I will do so again. Grow up faith. It is the campaigners attempting to prove a liar and murderer to be erm innocent that should worry about truth. Not us posters putting forward the Crowns case. It has already been proved. It matters not if it grinds you or anyone else personally involved.

[TruthSeeker2003]

Some of them were friends with Jodi. If they hadn't mentioned anything that would be wrong too

Nobody is denying them the right to a tribute. The tribute that the did was just wrong.

[TruthSeeker2003]

I agree. I would have been disgusted had they not acknowledged the date.

There were better ways that they could have gone about it.

[faithlilly]

Ah so you got to it prior to Mr Swah removing it. Now now. Are we still playing demand here. You first for we are talking of trust in these sources we have are we not? So we will need your friends name that worked with Scotmid. Their employee status and proof of their time there. Of back up of the claims of how the whole system works, but above all them saying, along with their name that the police were lying, that there was nothing wrong with the till mechanism the day in question. Of how long they keep CCTV if there was any request for it and so forth. - Sound ridiculous?  Or you could simply prove the word of my source to be wrong. I'm absolutely fine with that. Ask a friend? If not Mitchell himself. Of the direction in those case notes. It should be there, word for word. 

Of this copy cat "ball in your court" game. I've said it before to you and I will do so again. Grow up faith. It is the campaigners attempting to prove a liar and murderer to be erm innocent that should worry about truth. Not us posters putting forward the Crowns case. It has already been proved. It matters not if it grinds you or anyone else personally involved.

To be clear I’m not demanding anything, I am simply asking you to respect forum rules.

For weeks, if not months I have put forward the perfectly reasonable deduction that it is possible with a majority verdict 7 out of the 15 jury members could have voted not to convict. For weeks if not months you have answered my posts without a whisper of the information you have latterly brought to the forum about the judge’s direction. So my first question would be why reveal it now?

[faithlilly]

There were better ways that they could have gone about it.

Be honest, you  wouldn’t have been satisfied no matter what the group had done to pay tribute. As it was some of your number decided to mark the day by, again, stalking anyone remotely linked to this case. Do you think that that was a fitting tribute?

[rulesapply]

Maybe if you didn’t spend your time trolling her you’d be able to do something worthwhile too?

Trolling who? Sharon Sunshine? I have never tolled  her. You've accused me of it so please show proof of this imaginary trolling. Thanks.

[Dexter]

Trolling who? Sharon Sunshine? I have never tolled  her. You've accused me of it so please show proof of this imaginary trolling. Thanks.

The last few posts I've read from certain people on here reminds me of the bullies at school. Desperate to impress rude couldnt care less makes no sense and wrong

Read some of the comments back

Its already been asked but where was the respect on the day of the anniversary and where is the respect with demands to read every single word about the case where a young girl was slaughtered

For your entertainment it seems as it's a full time job.

[mrswah]

Yet again I have had to delete posts because they are unacceptably rude.

Please follow the forum rules, and show respect to other posters. Thank you.

[rulesapply]

Yet again I have had to delete posts because they are unacceptably rude.

Please follow the forum rules, and show respect to other posters. Thank you.

You have also left damaging posts with no cities, nothing to back up claims, nothing but accusations made with no backing so ,forgive me if I come across as rude but I was just looking for, fair.

[TruthSeeker2003]

Be honest, you  wouldn’t have been satisfied no matter what the group had done to pay tribute. As it was some of your number decided to mark the day by, again, stalking anyone remotely linked to this case. Do you think that that was a fitting tribute?

Stalking? It's all over social media. If that makes me a stalker for being on social media. Surely you being in the forum in the same thing? No? 

[Nicholas]

Posted today on the ‘unofficial’ LM Facebook page by Lisa C Reynolds Peden ⬇️



Luke has also advised Sandra that all documents that have been withheld from the public for years be released immediately. He has been too concerned about upsetting other people, and following other wishes,but has lost his childhood, teenage years and adolescence. He will not stand for this anymore.
l

What is the penalty in Scotland if someone - a lay person not a lawyer - were to publish for example Killer Luke Mitchell’s police witness statements?