Author Topic: Trial of Kim Potter (Daunte Wright Shooting)  (Read 14859 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Trial of Kim Potter (Daunte Wright Shooting)
« Reply #60 on: December 17, 2021, 03:05:25 PM »
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Trial of Kim Potter (Daunte Wright Shooting)
« Reply #61 on: December 17, 2021, 04:38:21 PM »
Kim Potter is now testifying.

She will be up against a female prosecutor on cross examination.

She needs to try & prove she feared for Sgt Johnson's life.

Based on everything I've seen, I think she has absolutely no chance.

I don't think the narrative she has created after the fact is going to stand up to scrutiny.

The slip & capture professor has been subpoenaed by the state for potential recall after Kim Potters testimony, which could also be a problem as she had prior discussions with him regarding the incident, but hasn't to my knowledge ever given an official statement.
« Last Edit: December 17, 2021, 04:59:20 PM by Wonderfulspam »
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Trial of Kim Potter (Daunte Wright Shooting)
« Reply #62 on: December 17, 2021, 05:49:27 PM »
She claims to have seen fear in Johnson's face like she's never seen & her recollection of events seems conveniently hazy.

She claims not to remember anything much that happened during the incident or immediately after.

She does not recall saying anything about going to prison either (which prompted Johnson to throw her a potential defense & claiming Mr Wright was trying to drive off with him in the car).
« Last Edit: December 17, 2021, 06:08:21 PM by Wonderfulspam »
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Trial of Kim Potter (Daunte Wright Shooting)
« Reply #63 on: December 20, 2021, 03:00:21 PM »
Closing arguments & Jury instruction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQxIepUgHrg

Frame by frame, she's absolutely screwed.

The prosecution closing has destroyed her defence.

Kim Potter is represented by attorney Earl Gray, practicing criminal defence since 1970 he's one of the most experienced defence lawyers in the USA, & he's going to need every minute of that experience to make her look anything other than guilty imo.
« Last Edit: December 20, 2021, 04:42:18 PM by Wonderfulspam »
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Trial of Kim Potter (Daunte Wright Shooting)
« Reply #64 on: December 23, 2021, 07:49:31 PM »

After days of deliberation Kim Potter has been found guilty on both charges.

She has been taken into custody & will be sentenced February.

The prosecution have been pushing for aggravating factors to be considered, she could face a maximum sentence of 25 years.

Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline barrier

Re: Trial of Kim Potter (Daunte Wright Shooting)
« Reply #65 on: December 26, 2021, 11:21:42 AM »
Thanks for giving a running synopsis spammy.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Trial of Kim Potter (Daunte Wright Shooting)
« Reply #66 on: December 26, 2021, 06:54:03 PM »
Thanks for giving a running synopsis spammy.
@)(++(* yes we’ve all been silently agog with interest.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Trial of Kim Potter (Daunte Wright Shooting)
« Reply #67 on: December 27, 2021, 10:33:30 AM »
Well I found it interesting even if no one else did.

There's another trial beginning January, a father & son from Aberline, Texas, shot dead another man during an argument over a dumped mattress.

They are claiming self defence but the video taken by the dead mans wife shows something quite different.

Not sure if it's being televised but I hope so, as it will be interesting to see a defence attorney try to justify shooting someone in the face for dumping a mattress.
« Last Edit: December 27, 2021, 10:41:47 AM by Wonderfulspam »
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Trial of Kim Potter (Daunte Wright Shooting)
« Reply #68 on: December 27, 2021, 10:41:15 AM »

Video of the deadly mattress confrontation is available in the link.


A Texas Father And Son Were Recorded On Video Fatally Shooting Their Neighbor Over Trash.



John Miller and Michael Miller were charged with murder after they allegedly shot dead Aaron Howard during a confrontation over a mattress in a dumpster. Warning: Video contains graphic footage.

A father and son from Abilene, Texas, were charged with murder after they were caught on video fatally shooting their neighbor during a dispute over trash.

John Miller, 67, and his son, Michael Miller, 31, were charged with first-degree murder in the death of Aaron Howard, 37.

They were arrested Sept. 1, but were released a day later on a surety bond of $25,000, jail records showed.

However, the two men were taken into custody on Friday after a district court reviewed the initial bonds and raised them to $250,000 each, police said Friday.

The deadly encounter between the neighbors was recorded on video by Howard’s common-law wife Kara Box.

The video, published by the Star-Telegram, showed the Millers — armed with guns — arguing with Howard over a mattress that Howard had dumped in the shared alleyway behind their homes on Don Juan Street.

The video captured the Millers firing multiple rounds at Howard who was shot at least twice, police said. He died after being transported to the hospital, police said.

Both the Millers admitted to shooting Howard, police said.

Abilene Police Chief Stan Standridge said that the neighbors began arguing over trash in the alleyway a “couple of days” before the Sept. 1 shooting.

Box told the Star-Telegram that she and Howard had thrown out a twin mattress in a dumpster in the alley a few days before the shooting.

On the morning of Sept. 1, the couple saw that the mattress was on their property so they tossed it back in the dumpster, Box said. This prompted their next-door neighbor John Miller to throw the mattress back on their property, Box said.

An argument ensued between Howard and John Miller who refused to put the mattress back in the dumpster and then pulled a handgun out of his pocket, Box said.

This enraged Howard, who accused his neighbor of pulling a gun while his nieces and nephews were in the backyard with him, according to Box.

The fight escalated when John’s son, Michael Miller, retrieved a shotgun from his residence, police said.

There were a total of five people in the alley, including the Millers, Howard, Box, and an unidentified member of Howard’s family, police said.

In the video, both Box and Howard can be heard shouting at John Miller for pulling a gun in front of children.

“If you come closer to me, I’ll kill you,” John Miller is heard telling Howard.

Howard — who did not have a gun — is heard repeatedly telling John Miller that he was going to kill him.

“You’re in an alley with a shotgun, you piece of shit,” Howard is heard saying. “I’m going to kill you.”

“I doubt it,” the older Miller responds.

Michael Miller, who is seen standing behind his father holding a shotgun over his shoulder, then tells Howard, “First of all, if you’re going to show this video to the cops you might as well stop yelling that you’re going to kill us.”

Howard is then heard yelling, “I don't give a f..k. I will f..king kill you. You pulled a gun on my kids.”

John Miller is heard telling Howard to “back up” several times.

At some point during the confrontation, Howard’s family member reportedly retrieved a baseball bat from their residence, according to police.

John Miller is then heard egging Howard on to “take a swing” at him, while Howard repeatedly provokes him to point the gun at him.

Howard then tells the younger Miller, “You're a bitch, I’m going to kill you too,” to which the son responds, “f..k off, cocksucker.”

“If you come within three feet of me, I’m going to kill you,” the older Miller is heard telling Howard.

Box interjects, saying, “You're not going to shoot my husband.”

Howard repeatedly shouts, “shoot me” and “point it.”

At least two gunshots are then heard on the video, after which Michael Miller can be seen firing his shotgun.

At least another four shots can be heard in the video, and police said that callers reported as many as five shots being fired.

Box is then heard screaming, “Aaron, no, no,” as she rushed toward her husband.

Box told the Star-Telegram that John Miller then put the handgun to her head and yelled at her to get on the ground, while his son went to Howard’s brother and placed the shotgun to his head. Police responded to the scene shortly after.

A detective who reviewed the footage believed that it was apparent from the video and interviews with the Millers that "they were tired of their neighbor, Aaron Howard, acting out and yelling and threatening them verbally," according to a statement released by Abilene police on Friday.

The statement said that Howard "got more and more upset" during the argument as the Millers stood in the alley with their firearms.

Police said that John Miller fired the first rounds as soon as Howard raised his baseball bat while standing approximately seven feet away from John. At the time when Michael Miller discharged his shotgun, and his father fired the final two rounds, Howard was unarmed, police said.

“I really don’t have a comment one way or the other,” John Miller told the Washington Post on Thursday. “This is something that I consider a private matter between me and the state of Texas.”

The Millers could not be reached for comment Friday.

“[The Millers] deserve to spend your lives in prison,” Box told KTXS.

She did not respond to BuzzFeed News’ request for comment.

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/tasneemnashrulla/father-son-texas-shooting-neighbor-trash-video

Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Trial of Kim Potter (Daunte Wright Shooting)
« Reply #69 on: January 28, 2022, 11:42:03 PM »

District attorney says no charges against Jacksonville police officer who shot & killed son

Jan. 20, 2022

JACKSONVILLE, N.C. (WITN) - A special prosecutor said there will be no charges brought against a Jacksonville police officer for shooting and killing his teenage son.

Wilmington District Attorney Ben David announced that determination in a morning press conference at the Onslow County Courthouse.

Officials say Detective John Clukey fatally shot his son, Alexander Clukey, outside the family home on Haw Branch Road on Dec. 27th. At the time, deputies said the child’s father accidentally shot his son in the head.

Prosecutors say the officer left his home to retrieve his police vehicle and had his service revolver on his side. They say when he returned home, he was met by his son, and the two engaged in an Airsoft gun battle in the front yard. The three Airsoft guns were Christmas gifts; Clukey had two pistol-style Airsoft guns, and his son had an AR-15-style Airsoft gun.

When Clukey’s first pistol-style Airsoft gun was empty, he threw that to the ground and mistakenly grabbed his service weapon instead of the second Airsoft gun.

David’s summary of events said once the officer realized he had shot his service weapon, he ran to his son and called 911. The dispatcher asked for the address of the emergency, which Clukey gave, adding, “my son was playing fake guns and someone shot with a real gun.”

While waiting for over 11 minutes for emergency personnel, Clukey said “I deserve everything I have coming to me,” “take me instead,” “stay with me,” and “I’m so sorry,” according to David’s report. David says at one point during the call, another child of Clukey left the house, and he told them to go back inside.

David said the investigation showed that Clukey mistakenly believed he was pointing a toy gun at his son. He said the officer should have been more careful than to play an Airsoft game with his son while having a real gun in his holster.

The special prosecutor said there was not a real likelihood that they would receive a conviction if charges were brought. Detectives were unable to find any eyewitness to the shooting and it was outside the view of any cameras.

“There is no evidence that John Clukey intended the death or injury of Alexander Clukey,” David said. “No substantiated evidence of any domestic abuse or threats of abuse, or of any homicidal ideation or planning have been discovered. Everything about this incident shows a father who did not intend for this to happen.”

David added that a killing not meant to have happened is not the end of an investigation, but there is no evidence that this killing occurred during the course of unlawful conduct. According to David, it is not against the law to have a consensual Airsoft game with a child, but it is a crime to knowingly point a firearm at anyone “either in fun or otherwise, whether such a gun or pistol be loaded or not loaded.”

Onslow County District Attorney Ernie Lee removed himself from the investigation earlier this month. Lee says that he made the decision to avoid the appearance of any partiality or potential conflict. Clukey is a lead detective in an upcoming murder trial, according to Lee.

The North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts officially assigned Attorney Ben David and his office to the case.

Clukey has been a police officer since 2010 and his current rank is listed as corporal. He was placed on administrative leave after the shooting, according to Jacksonville police.

https://www.witn.com/2022/01/20/district-attorney-provide-update-da-investigation-officer-shooting-son/
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Trial of Kim Potter (Daunte Wright Shooting)
« Reply #70 on: February 10, 2022, 01:26:16 PM »

Didn't have to wait long for another Slip & Capture Error.

Luckily for this officer the detainee survived, this is going to happen again unless they redesign Tasers into a different shape to guns, with a push button instead of pull trigger action system & they are carried in an entirely different area from the duty belt.

Officers train roughly 80% of the time on guns & only 20% on Tasers.

But, if training was split 50/50, I'm not sure that would decrease the risk of weapon confusion.


Another cop who couldn't tell the difference between a gun and a Taser: Police force says Florida officer who shot and paralyzed a naked man thought he pulled out his taser - six weeks after Kim Potter was convicted of manslaughter for killing teen

9 February 2022

The police statement was released late Tuesday after civil rights attorney Benjamin Crump announced a lawsuit to force the release of surveillance video

The Ortiz lawsuit comes as Minneapolis police officer Kim Potter awaits sentencing for manslaughter after killing Daunte Wright during a traffic stop 

She too said she thought she was firing her stun gun, not her handgun

The officer who shot Ortiz was put on desk duty pending a Florida Department of Law Enforcement investigation

Police say the Florida officer who shot and paralyzed a naked man thought he pulled out his Taser, mirroring former Minneapolis officer Kim Potter who was convicted of manslaughter for killing a teen last December. 

On Monday civil rights attorney Benjamin Crump announced a lawsuit to force the release of surveillance video of the July 3 shooting that paralyzed 42-year-old Michael Ortiz.

The Ortiz lawsuit comes as former Minneapolis police officer Kim Potter awaits sentencing after she was found guilty of first-degree and second-degree manslaughter in late December. 

Hollywood, Florida police released a statement late Tuesday saying that the unidentified officer thought he was deploying his stun gun when he shot and seriously wounded Ortiz.

'While the investigation is still active and ongoing, an initial review suggests the officer intended to deploy his taser, but instead discharged his firearm,' the statement said.

According to police, Ortiz called 911 saying he had taken drugs and was suffering from chest pains. Paramedics responded first. Ortiz, naked and agitated, emerged from a sixth floor apartment and threatened to jump from a balcony.   

Officers were sent to the scene to assist Hollywood Fire Rescue after Ortiz refused to open the door and began making 'delusional and suicidal statements,' the police statement said.

One officer deployed a Taser and put Ortiz in restraints, but he used his legs to resist as they tried to move him into an elevator to a waiting rescue vehicle, the statement said.

'As he continued to resist, an officer discharged his firearm, striking Mr. Ortiz once,' the police statement said.

The officer who shot Ortiz was put on desk duty pending a Florida Department of Law Enforcement investigation, police said. 

But Crump offered a different account what what took place.

He said last summer Ortiz called 911 to report his dog missing, then took a shower and was wearing a towel when police showed up at his door.

Crump also said that video taken from a nearby apartment building recorded some of what happened and police need to release it.

'You must release the video that shows us why you shot a naked man, face down and paralyzed him,' Crump told CBS-4.

'He was having a crisis; he needed a helping hand. He didn't need a bullet in his spine,' Crump said on Monday.

'Eight months of Michael every day trying to figure out why did the police officer shoot him in the back?' Crump added. 'Why is he paralyzed for life? Why does he have over $1.4 million in medical bills that continue to rise every day? Why would the Hollywood Police Department continue to deny them the answers that they deserve? The truth that they deserve?'

Sitting in a wheelchair next to Crump at Monday's press conference, Ortiz had a message for the police officer, simply asking: 'Why? Why did you have the need to shoot me?' 

Police said the FDLE's findings will be submitted to the state attorney's office for review, and then the Hollywood Police internal affairs unit will investigate.

'We empathize with Mr. Ortiz and his family and know they have many questions about that evening,' police said. 'Our hope is that once the investigation is complete, we will be able to meet with them and provide any additional information they are seeking.'

The police statement confirmed that the department preserved all evidence and records of the case in response to a July 12 request by the law firm Morgan and Morgan on behalf of Ortiz's family. The law firm also indicated they mailed a public records request to the general police headquarters address, bypassing a records request on the agency's online web portal.

Hollywood police said there is no record of the letter being received by the records division, and the law firm told police they are no longer representing Ortiz. The police statement said the department received no other public records requests about the shooting until Monday, the day Crump announced the lawsuit. 

Potter, who is white, shot and killed the 20-year-old Wright during an April 11 traffic stop in Brooklyn Center as she and other officers were trying to arrest him on an outstanding warrant for a weapons possession charge.

Potter claimed that she confused her handgun for her Taser when she shot and killed Wright in April 2020. During her trial, she tearfully testified that she 'didn't want to hurt anybody.'

Wright's shooting happened at a time of high tension in the area, with Chauvin standing trial in nearby Minneapolis for Floyd’s murder.

Jurors saw video of the shooting from police body cameras and dashcams. As Wright pulled away while another officer attempted to handcuff him, Potter repeatedly said she would tase him, but instead shot him once in his chest with her gun, which was in her hand.

'(Expletive)! I just shot him. ... I grabbed the wrong [expletive] gun,' Potter said on video shown to the jury. Moments later, she said: 'I’m going to go to prison.'

During her sometimes tearful testimony, Potter told jurors that she was 'sorry it happened.' She said the traffic stop “just went chaotic.'

The maximum prison sentence for first-degree manslaughter is 15 years. Minnesota law sentences defendants only on their most serious conviction when multiple counts involve the same act and the same victim, and state guidelines call for about seven years on that charge.

Prosecutors have said they would seek to prove aggravating factors that merit what’s called an upward departure from sentencing guidelines. In Potter’s case, they alleged that her actions were a danger to others, including her fellow officers, to Wright’s passenger and to the couple whose car was struck by Wright’s after the shooting. They also alleged she abused her authority as a police officer.

Potter’s attorneys argued that she made a tragic mistake, but that she also would have been justified in using deadly force because of the possibility that Potter’s fellow officer, then-Sgt. Mychal Johnson, was at risk of being dragged if Wright had driven away from the traffic stop.

Potter testified that she decided to act after seeing a look of fear on Johnson’s face. But Eldridge pointed out to jurors that for much of the interaction, Potter was behind a third officer she was training and that Johnson didn’t come into her camera’s view until after the shot was fired — and then it showed the top of his head as he backed away.

“Sgt. Johnson was clearly not afraid of being dragged,” Eldridge said. “He never said he was scared. He didn’t say it then, and he didn’t testify to it in court.”

Eldridge also noted an inconsistency in Potter’s testimony, saying that when she gave an interview to a psychologist working for the defense team, she told him she didn’t know why she used her Taser. Potter told the jury she didn’t recall saying that.

First-degree manslaughter required prosecutors to prove that Potter caused Wright’s death while committing a misdemeanor — in her case, the reckless handling of a firearm. The second-degree charge required them to prove that she caused Wright’s death by “culpable negligence.”

Crump, who also represented Wright's family, likened Potter's conviction to those of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin, who murdered black man George Floyd in May 2020, and the three white men from Georgia who were found guilty this month of gunning down Ahmaud Arbery as he was running away.

Crump said Potter's verdict was as 'profound' as the others, arguing that '2021 [is] a historical year in our quest for racial justice in America.... it really is about not just a victory for accountability for Daunte Wright's family, but it is a victory for America in our quest for equal justice under the law.'

Potter, 49, faces about seven years in prison under the state’s sentencing guidelines, but prosecutors said they would seek a longer term.
 
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10494395/Police-Officer-thought-handgun-stun-gun-shooting.html
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Trial of Kim Potter (Daunte Wright Shooting)
« Reply #71 on: February 16, 2022, 09:31:29 AM »
Kim Potter sentencing this Friday 18th Feb.

State changes course in seeking guideline sentence for Kim Potter

State prosecutors have changed their position on seeking an upward sentencing departure for Kimberly Potter, the ex-Brooklyn Center police officer who was convicted of manslaughter for fatally shooting Daunte Wright during an April 11, 2021 traffic stop.

In a filing submitted Tuesday, Attorney General Keith Ellison’s prosecution team requested Judge Regina Chu issue a presumptive sentence under Minnesota sentencing guidelines for Potter’s first-degree manslaughter conviction. The state had previously announced its intent to seek an upward sentencing departure based on aggravating factors.

Namely, the prosecution previously argued Potter’s actions posed a “greater-than-normal danger” to the passenger in the car with Wright, the other officers near Wright’s car and the people in the car Wright crashed into after Potter shot him. They also argued Potter abused her position of authority as a police officer.

Now, with Potter’s sentencing hearing days away, the state’s sentencing memorandum defers to Minnesota sentencing guidelines, which would set her sentence between 74 and 103 months, with a presumptive sentence of 86 months, or just over seven years. Potter’s defense attorneys had previously challenged an upward departure, and have asked the judge for probation and a downward durational departure.

The memo points out that “a court may only depart from a presumptive sentence when they can articulate ‘substantial and compelling’ circumstances,” but this is only in reference to the defense’s request for a downward sentencing departure. The state’s previous rhetoric about a greater sentence is never mentioned.

Potter’s sentencing hearing is set for Friday at 9 a.m.

https://kstp.com/kstp-news/top-news/state-changes-course-in-seeking-guideline-sentence-for-kim-potter/
« Last Edit: February 16, 2022, 09:59:32 AM by Wonderfulspam »
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Trial of Kim Potter (Daunte Wright Shooting)
« Reply #72 on: February 16, 2022, 04:24:59 PM »

In a 12-page sentencing memo filed Tuesday, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison asked Hennepin County Judge Regina Chu to impose the presumptive sentence of 86 months, or seven years and two months for Potter's conviction.

"Daunte Wright, and his life must be held in the highest regard as well. The presumptive sentence reflects that seriousness of the loss of his life," Ellison wrote.

"In addition, the presumptive sentence reflects the culpability of the Defendant's recklessness in causing Daunte Wright's death," he continued.

The maximum penalty for first-degree manslaughter predicated on reckless use/ handling of a firearm is 15 years in prison and/or a $30,000 fine.

However, Minnesota sentencing guidelines give a judge discretion to sentence convicted offenders with no criminal history, such as Potter, to roughly between six and eight and a half years in prison, with a presumptive sentence of 86 months.

In arguing against defense attorneys' request for a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines or a probationary disposition, Ellison acknowledged Potter is in a "unique position" to help prevent another case of "weapons confusion," saying she could speak to law enforcement groups, trainers or legislators about her experience.

While steps like this could help the community heal, Potter "made a colossal, lethal error, an error she was trained to avoid," Eillison wrote.

"By acknowledging her failure, she is subject to the law like all others," he wrote.

According to Minnesota law, Potter will be required to serve two-thirds of her sentence in prison. With good behavior, she will be eligible for supervised release for the remaining third.

Since her conviction, Potter has been incarcerated at the state correctional facility in Shakopee, according to records from the Minnesota Department of Corrections.

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/02/15/us/kim-potter-prosecutor-daunte-wright-sentencing/index.html
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Trial of Kim Potter (Daunte Wright Shooting)
« Reply #73 on: February 17, 2022, 05:05:31 PM »

What to Watch at Kim Potter's Sentencing Hearing

The maximum sentence for that count is 15 years in prison, but state sentencing guidelines call for much less. For someone with no criminal history, such as Potter, the guidelines for first-degree manslaughter call for a sentence ranging from slightly more than six years to about 8 1/2 years, with the presumptive sentence being just over seven years.

The guidelines are advisory, but judges can't go above or below the advised range unless they find a compelling reason to do so. Prosecutors initially argued that aggravating factors should warrant a sentence above the guidelines. But this week, they filed another document saying the presumptive sentence is proper.

The defense is seeking a lighter sentence than the guidelines suggest, including one of probation only. In order for Judge Regina Chu to do that, she would have to find mitigating factors that show this case is significantly less serious than the typical first-degree manslaughter case. She has not yet ruled on whether there are aggravating or mitigating factors.


WHAT DO PROSECUTORS SAY?

Prosecutors initially asked Chu to find aggravating factors. Specifically, they argued that Potter abused her authority as an officer and that her actions caused a greater-than-normal danger to others. There is nothing in the court record to suggest they have withdrawn that request.

But in a court filing Tuesday, prosecutor Matt Frank said the presumptive sentence would be proper because it “takes into account the main elements of the conviction: the death of Daunte Wright and Defendant’s recklessness.”


WHAT IS THE DEFENSE'S POSITION?

In asking for a lighter sentence than the guidelines suggest, Potter's attorneys argued that Wright was the aggressor.

“All Mr. Wright had to do was stop, obey lawful commands, and he’d be alive," they wrote.

They cite the federal case stemming from the 1991 beating of Rodney King as a comparison. They said in that case, a judge sentenced former Los Angeles police Sgt. Stacey Koon below federal guidelines for violating King's civil rights and found “the victim’s wrongful conduct contributed significantly to provoking the offensive behavior.”

Prosecutors had sought about 10 years in prison, but Koon got 2 1/2 years. Potter's attorneys wrote that the decision to depart from the guidelines in Koon's case was ultimately upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court. But one legal expert said they did not include other context: that the decision was fraught with controversy and led Congress to change the standard that the Supreme Court used to affirm Koon's sentence.

“It was a big downward departure, and at the time the sentencing guidelines were mandatory,” said Mark Osler, a former federal prosecutor who is now a professor at the University of St. Thomas School of Law. He said the defense's decision to mention that case “shows a certain blindness to the larger scope of history — they're citing to a downward departure that was rebuked by the Congress of the United States.”

Prosecutors said it was “incredulous” that the defense would use the case arising from King's beating to support their request for a shorter sentence.

In arguing for only probation, Potter’s attorneys said she has no prior record, is remorseful, has had an exemplary career and has the support of family and friends. They also said her risk of committing the same crime again is low because she is no longer a police officer, and that she would do well on probation.


IS ONLY PROBATION POSSIBLE?

Yes, if the judge finds that there are mitigating factors.

Prosecutors have argued against a lesser sentence, including one of probation only. But they also said in a court filing that "the State recognizes that this is a unique case given the context in which Defendant Potter recklessly handled her firearm.”

Frank wrote that if the judge decides prison time isn't warranted, probation should be for 10 years and Potter should have to spend a year in jail. He also said she should be required to speak to law enforcement groups about the dangers of confusing a handgun for a Taser, and required to speak to Wright's family if they choose.

Frank said if Chu finds that Potter’s case is less serious than the typical first-degree manslaughter case, she should sentence Potter to between four and slightly more than seven years in prison, which would be the presumptive sentences for second-degree and first-degree manslaughter.


WHAT WILL HAPPEN AT THE HEARING?

One of Potter's attorneys, Paul Engh, said she intends to make a statement. Engh said the defense has also submitted a “heavy volume” of letters in support of Potter, and the attorneys plan to read some of them in court.

Prosecutors also plan to present victim impact statements, in which victims or family members can share how they have been affected by the crime.

If Chu finds there are no aggravating or mitigating factors, she’ll sentence Potter within the range of slightly more than six years to about 8 1/2 years.

Marsh Halberg, a Minneapolis defense attorney who isn't connected to the case, predicted Chu would stay within the guidelines because such a sentence would likely hold up on appeal.

“It’s kind of bulletproof,” he said. “Before anybody opens their mouth, the judge is in that guideline range box.”


HOW LONG WILL POTTER SERVE?

In Minnesota, it’s presumed that an inmate who behaves well will serve two-thirds of their penalty in prison and the rest on supervised release, commonly known as parole.

That means if Potter gets the roughly seven-year presumptive sentence, she would serve about four years and nine months in custody before being paroled.

If sentenced to probation, she would be placed under conditions — violations of which could get her sent to prison.

Potter has been at the women’s prison in Shakopee since the guilty verdict. Nicholas Kimball, a spokesman for the state Department of Corrections, said she has been kept separate from the rest of the prison population.

https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2022-02-17/explainer-what-to-watch-at-kim-potters-sentencing-hearing
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Trial of Kim Potter (Daunte Wright Shooting)
« Reply #74 on: February 18, 2022, 06:48:56 PM »

Kim Potter Trial - Full Sentencing Hearing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4HWcAfAj_g


Ex-police officer Kim Potter sentenced to two years for fatally shooting Daunte Wright

A Minnesota judge on Friday sentenced former police officer Kim Potter to two years in prison, far less than what was sought by prosecutors in the fatal shooting of Black motorist Daunte Wright.

Hennepin County Judge Regina Chu handed down the punishment for the former Brooklyn Center police officer after emotional courtroom statements from the victim's loved ones and the defendant herself.

Chu ordered Potter to spend two-thirds of her sentence behind bars and one-third of it on supervised release. She's already served 58 days behind bars, which will go to her credit.

A Minnesota judge on Friday sentenced former police officer Kim Potter to two years in prison, far less than what was sought by prosecutors in the fatal shooting of Black motorist Daunte Wright.

Hennepin County Judge Regina Chu handed down the punishment for the former Brooklyn Center police officer after emotional courtroom statements from the victim's loved ones and the defendant herself.

Chu ordered Potter to spend two-thirds of her sentence behind bars and one-third of it on supervised release. She's already served 58 days behind bars, which will go to her credit.

Potter's online Department of Corrections records were quickly updated after Friday morning's sentencing, showing she will likely walk free on April 24 next year.

Chu said Potter deserved less than the 86-month sentence sought by prosecutors because the officer was trying to use her Taser and not her gun.

The judge said she knows her ruling will be unpopular.

“I recognize there will be those who disagree with the sentence; that I granted a significant downward departure, does not in any way diminish Daunte Wright’s life,” Chu said.

The judge said she's never seen a case like this before.

"This is one of the saddest cases that I’ve had in my 20 years on the bench," Chu said.

Outside court, the victim’s mother, Katie Wright, said "the justice system murdered him all over again."

The grieving mom appeared to discount the tears Potter shed in court as the former police officer apologized for her deadly actions.

“This isn’t OK,” she said. “This is the problem with our justice system today. White women’s tears trumps, trumps justice. And I thought my white woman tears would be good enough because they’re true and genuine.”

Ben Crump, an attorney for the family, was particularly angered by Potter's sentence, compared to the 57-month punishment against former Minneapolis police officer Mohamed Noor.

Noor, a Somali immigrant, was convicted of shooting a 911 caller, mistaking her as a threat to his partner.

"He was remorseful but they didn’t make a downward departure for the Black police officer like they made for this white policewoman," Crump said. "And that’s problematic for many people of color in America. That we continue to see this intellectual justification."

Before sentence was issued, Wright’s mother asked a judge to send her son’s killer to prison, telling Potter that she’ll “never be able to forgive you for what you’ve stolen from us.”

“Daunte Wright is my son, my baby boy and I say ‘is’ and not ‘was’ because he will always be my son and I’m proud to say that,” Katie Wright told the court. “Daunte’s smile was genuine and big, just like his dreams. You took them. You took his future.”

Potter, 49, has been in custody since just before Christmas last year, when jurors convicted her of first-degree manslaughter for the April 11, 2021, slaying of 20-year-old Wright in the Minneapolis suburb of Brooklyn Center.

The victim’s father, Arbuey Wright, told the court he loved his son.

"I was so proud to be his father. He was handsome, he was my son, my prince,” he said. “He was my reason to do better. He was my reason to change in life.”

Wright was pulled over and police tried to arrest him on an outstanding weapons charge when he tried to get back into his car.

During a brief struggle, Potter — with a Glock holstered her right, dominant side, and her Taser on the left — pulled the firearm and fatally shot Wright.

She testified in her own defense, saying the shooting was an accident and that she had meant to pull her non-lethal Taser.

A sobbing Potter on Friday apologized to Wright's loved ones.

"To the family of Daunte Wright, I am so sorry that I brought the death of your son, brother, father, uncle, grandson, nephew and the rest of your family to your home," she said.

"Katie I understand a mother’s love and I am sorry I broke your heart."

Defense lawyer Paul Engh called Potter's act "an unintentional crime" and said his client is a suitable candidate for probation and not prison.

“This (case) is beyond tragic for everyone involved,” Engh told the court.

Potter sat at the defense table wearing a purple sweater and a blue paper medical mask.

Engh challenged claims by the prosecution and victim's family that Potter didn't show concern for Wright after she shot him.

"She was remorseful from the moment the gun was fired," he said. “We can’t have a Kafkaesque standard of what remorse is.”

Potter has been held in isolation for her own protection, the defense said. Engh showed the judge a box of "thousands" of sympathetic letters and cards mailed to Potter.

“People took the time to write her,” he said. “This is unheard of for a defendant. I dare say no one in this room has ever seen anything like this.”

But prosecutor Matthew Frank said the crime's impact cannot be understated, whether intentional or not.

“His name is Daunte Wright. We have to say his name. He’s not just the driver he was a living human being, a life," Frank said.

“The highest principle of law enforcement is the sanctity of life. His life counted. His life mattered. And that life was taken and the law recognized the severity of the loss of life when setting criminal penalties.”

Frank choked back emotion as he told Chu that this case demands significant prison time.

"This is a courtroom full of pain and anger," he said. "How do we fix that? What can we do? "

The slaying of Wright by a white officer sparked renewed protests and calls for justice in and around Minneapolis and other U.S. cities.

Wright was gunned down about 10 miles north of the courthouse where former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin was tried for killing George Floyd.

Days later, Chauvin, who is white, was convicted of second- and third-degree murder, as well as second-degree manslaughter. The May 25, 2020 killing of Floyd, a Black man, touched off a summer of national protests against police brutality and institutional racism.

Potter’s trial was held in the same courtroom where Chauvin was tried.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/daunte-wrights-mother-says-never-able-forgive-kim-potter-gunning-son-rcna16478
Christian Brueckner Fan Club