Author Topic: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner  (Read 98194 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #255 on: March 18, 2022, 10:17:31 PM »
Is this off-topic? Yes, and probably deflection too.
A bit like when you brought up the issue of parents sedating their children on the very first page of a thread about the boxes ticked by Brückner you mean?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #256 on: March 19, 2022, 07:39:05 AM »
(&^&

I'm really getting under your skin aren't I? Good.

Not at all. Baiting others usually happens when the baiter has run out of meaningful answers imo.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline G-Unit

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #257 on: March 19, 2022, 07:44:53 AM »
A bit like when you brought up the issue of parents sedating their children on the very first page of a thread about the boxes ticked by Brückner you mean?

Only because others claimed the McCanns had no motive on the very first page of a thread about the boxes ticked by Brückner. Why did they bring the McCanns into the discussion?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Ms Para glider

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #258 on: March 19, 2022, 07:47:37 AM »
Not at all. Baiting others usually happens when the baiter has run out of meaningful answers imo.

Oh dear. You really have lost the plot haven't you. What questions do you have dear? I've got plenty of answers.

Offline Ms Para glider

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #259 on: March 19, 2022, 07:58:26 AM »
Only because others claimed the McCanns had no motive on the very first page of a thread about the boxes ticked by Brückner. Why did they bring the McCanns into the discussion?

They brought it up because sadly, people like you cannot let it go. It was pointed out, that despite your best efforts, unlike Brueckner the McCanns had no motive. You tried to offer one up but unfortunately fell at the first hurdle of evidence. And since you are all about the evidence, the fact you had to resort to such extreme speculation to come up with a motive is illustrative of how far the sceptics will go to keep their hope alive. Their hope that Brueckner is not the guilty party. So sad.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #260 on: March 19, 2022, 08:08:15 AM »
Not at all. Baiting others usually happens when the baiter has run out of meaningful answers imo.
I’m afraid Para is running rings around you and doing a great job exposing every flaw in your argument. Perhaps you should ignore him like you largely ignore me?  That way you can stick your head back in the sand, confident that you are always right about everything. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #261 on: March 19, 2022, 09:05:40 AM »
Oh dear. You really have lost the plot haven't you. What questions do you have dear? I've got plenty of answers.

Please attempt to be polite. I don't like moderating members but I can and will.

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Ms Para glider

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #262 on: March 19, 2022, 09:14:05 AM »
Please attempt to be polite. I don't like moderating members but I can and will.

Have you been polite to me? Especially considering I'm a new member. Several times now you have interjected yourself into conversations in which you were not involved purely to make derogatory comments towards me while adding nothing to the topic of discussion. If you want me to go back and point out examples, I will. Do not threaten me.

Offline G-Unit

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #263 on: March 19, 2022, 09:20:02 AM »
They brought it up because sadly, people like you cannot let it go. It was pointed out, that despite your best efforts, unlike Brueckner the McCanns had no motive. You tried to offer one up but unfortunately fell at the first hurdle of evidence. And since you are all about the evidence, the fact you had to resort to such extreme speculation to come up with a motive is illustrative of how far the sceptics will go to keep their hope alive. Their hope that Brueckner is not the guilty party. So sad.

The fact remains that it wasn't me who brought the McCanns into this thread.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Ms Para glider

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #264 on: March 19, 2022, 09:22:40 AM »
How do I report a Moderator for improper behaviour? Asking for a friend.

Offline jassi

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #265 on: March 19, 2022, 09:25:19 AM »
email John. He's the Big Cheese on here.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline G-Unit

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #266 on: March 19, 2022, 09:27:35 AM »
Have you been polite to me? Especially considering I'm a new member. Several times now you have interjected yourself into conversations in which you were not involved purely to make derogatory comments towards me while adding nothing to the topic of discussion. If you want me to go back and point out examples, I will. Do not threaten me.

I think I have. Anyone can comment on anything posted here, there are no private conversations. If I've made derogatory comments of a personal nature I apologise. If I've made derogatory comments about the contents of your posts I don't.

I don't threaten people, but I may warn them.

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #267 on: March 19, 2022, 09:38:22 AM »
The fact remains that it wasn't me who brought the McCanns into this thread.
You seized on the opportunity to take the thread off topic by raising (for the umpteenth time) the issue of parents sedating their kids, which, according to you is a very common issue.  You're a moderator, you should have known better than to attempt to derail the thread with such an inflammatory post.  IMO.

Does Bruckner tick all the boxes of a child abductor / murderer?  What do you think?
« Last Edit: March 19, 2022, 09:41:06 AM by Vertigo Swirl »
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #268 on: March 19, 2022, 09:39:13 AM »
I think I have. Anyone can comment on anything posted here, there are no private conversations. If I've made derogatory comments of a personal nature I apologise. If I've made derogatory comments about the contents of your posts I don't.

I don't threaten people, but I may warn them.
Hmm, a Putinesque response  @)(++(*
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner
« Reply #269 on: March 19, 2022, 10:09:28 AM »
I think I have. Anyone can comment on anything posted here, there are no private conversations. If I've made derogatory comments of a personal nature I apologise. If I've made derogatory comments about the contents of your posts I don't.

I don't threaten people, but I may warn them.

I dont think John will be very happy with your attitude towards a well behaved poster with a massive input