The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner

[Eleanor]

But this is the paradox of the phone call evidence. If the call was from a person also involved in the abduction that person is not going to the police to incriminate himself is he and if it was from just a casual friend he can say he was sitting at the seafront chatting innocently to his friend for half an hour.
If the call did happen, CB knows who made it, and could deny its existence if it was a person involved calling as he knows that person would not be likely to come forward so he could just say it was an old friend he had at the time, can’t remember his name.
Without someone coming forward saying they made the call the phone evidence is not much use IMO.

Haven't they already found this person on another Thread?

[Vertigo Swirl]

All I know, its not 100%.

And yet 60-80% is good enough for some people.

[barrier]

Simple answer.  Ask him.

With him in prison its not like they can't find him, but they seem very reticent in engaging with him don't they.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Haven't they already found this person on another Thread?

Yes, it was his girlfriend Nicole F I believe.

[Icanhandlethetruth]

Haven't they already found this person on another Thread?

I think we have to call that speculation at this point.

[jassi]

Nothing at all to do with "opinion".

The internet is awash with proof all fronted by Amaral in person and in glorious technicolour spouting off to whichever TV programme he was being interviewed on at the time.
All while proudly holding up his photoshopped altered image of Brueckner and the painted van.

He lied - he has been caught out lying and has provided the proof of it.

 As far as I'm aware he didn't make these statements to investigating police or under oath in a court of law. but in some TV documentary  or other. He was giving his opinion as have many others.

[Vertigo Swirl]

As far as I'm aware he didn't make these statements to investigating police or under oath in a court of law. but in some TV documentary  or other. He was giving his opinion as have many others.

No what he was doing was lying.

[Eleanor]

Yes, it was his girlfriend Nicole F I believe.

Ah, yes.  She phoned him so can't supply him with an alibi for the rest of the evening.

[Eleanor]

As far as I'm aware he didn't make these statements to investigating police or under oath in a court of law. but in some TV documentary  or other. He was giving his opinion as have many others.

With curly dread locks and all.  That was some opinion.

[jassi]

With curly dread locks and all.  That was some opinion.

Sure, but it's not something he could be prosecuted for.

[faithlilly]

Sure, but it's not something he could be prosecuted for.

The disappointment is palpable.

[Eleanor]

The disappointment is palpable.

I did find the cartoons on Brueckner's van quite amusing.

[Brietta]

As far as I'm aware he didn't make these statements to investigating police or under oath in a court of law. but in some TV documentary  or other. He was giving his opinion as have many others.

His opinion presented as it was from December 2021 onwards could be construed as perverting the course of justice whether or not Brueckner ever sees the inside of a court.  At the very least Amaral interfered with an active police investigation only on this occasion his his lies soon became apparent.

[Brietta]

Sure, but it's not something he could be prosecuted for.

Don't know about that.

[faithlilly]

His opinion presented as it was from December 2021 onwards could be construed as perverting the course of justice whether or not Brueckner ever sees the inside of a court.  At the very least Amaral interfered with an active police investigation only on this occasion his his lies soon became apparent.

You do make me laugh Brietta dear.