The boxes ticked by prime suspect Brueckner

[jassi]

Don't know about that.

Think about it. What crime? What jurisdiction

[Brietta]

Think about it. What crime? What jurisdiction

The BKA - SY - the PJ are not only thinking, they are actively processing just that.

[jassi]

The BKA - SY - the PJ are not only thinking, they are actively processing just that.

Away with you. Total fantasy

[barrier]

This is what the update in June 20 said, nothing different since then.

Detective Chief Inspector Mark Cranwell, who leads Operation Grange, said:
“It’s more than 13 years since Madeleine went missing and none of us can
imagine what it must be like for her family, not knowing what happened or
where she is.
“Following the ten- year anniversary, the Met received information about a
German man who was known to have been in and around Praia da Luz. We
have been working with colleagues in Germany and Portugal and this man
is a suspect in Madeleine’s disappearance.
“The Met conducted a number of enquiries and in November 2017 engaged
with the BKA who agreed to work with the Met.
“Since then a huge amount of work has taken place by both the Met, the
BKA and the Polícia Judiciária.
“While this male is a suspect we retain an open mind as to his involvement
and this remains a missing person inquiry.
“Our job as detectives is to follow the evidence, maintain an open mind and
establish what happened on that day in May 2007

[Anthro]

But this is the paradox of the phone call evidence. If the call was from a person also involved in the abduction that person is not going to the police to incriminate himself is he and if it was from just a casual friend he can say he was sitting at the seafront chatting innocently to his friend for half an hour.
If the call did happen, CB knows who made it, and could deny its existence if it was a person involved calling as he knows that person would not be likely to come forward so he could just say it was an old friend he had at the time, can’t remember his name.
Without someone coming forward saying they made the call the phone evidence is not much use IMO.

Without someone coming forward saying they made the call the phone evidence is not much use IMO.
That number belonged to Nicole F?

[Icanhandlethetruth]

Without someone coming forward saying they made the call the phone evidence is not much use IMO.
That number belonged to Nicole F?

Are you telling me that the call was from Nicole F, or asking me if it was?
If you are asking, I have no idea.
 If you are telling me it was, how are you so sure?

[Brietta]

Are you telling me that the call was from Nicole F, or asking me if it was?
If you are asking, I have no idea.
 If you are telling me it was, how are you so sure?

Look up the recent information regarding documentaries and alibis and I think all may be revealed to you.

[Anthro]

Are you telling me that the call was from Nicole F, or asking me if it was?
If you are asking, I have no idea.
 If you are telling me it was, how are you so sure?

I can’t be sure but Jutta Rabe’s documentary points to that.

[Icanhandlethetruth]

Look up the recent information regarding documentaries and alibis and I think all may be revealed to you.

No I have heard it mentioned on the Sat 1 documentary but is that the absolute truth to you?
That's all the evidence you need? Someone said it on a documentary. Good for you, but I am a bit more sceptical of any made for entertainment documentary.

[Icanhandlethetruth]

I can’t be sure but Jutta Rabe’s documentary points to that.

It may well be the case that the call was from Nicole F, but the BKA website is still soliciting for information regarding the caller even now after nearly two years. If it was Nicole F, how did an investigative journalist find out so easy when the BKA have reportedly 100 men on the case. Now maybe the BKA have known this info all along but as Nicole F was known to them from the beginning surely they asked her if it was her number.

[Anthro]

It may well be the case that the call was from Nicole F, but the BKA website is still soliciting for information regarding the caller even now after nearly two years. If it was Nicole F, how did an investigative journalist find out so easy when the BKA have reportedly 100 men on the case. Now maybe the BKA have known this info all along but as Nicole F was known to them from the beginning surely they asked her if it was her number.

The BKA put the caller’s number in the public domain. I believe they had success in identifying the person.

[Icanhandlethetruth]

The BKA put the caller’s number in the public domain. I believe they had success in identifying the person.

I know the BKA put the number in the public domain its on their website right now. I missed the bit where the BKA announced they had success in identifying the person but I am happy to read it if you post it.

[Anthro]

I know the BKA put the number in the public domain its on their website right now. I missed the bit where the BKA announced they had success in identifying the person but I am happy to read it if you post it.

I didn’t say/meant the BKA as such, announced it. The person who identified the number, seems credible given the friendship.

[Icanhandlethetruth]

I didn’t say/meant the BKA as such, announced it. The person who identified the number, seems credible given the friendship.

So you are talking about the Sat 1 documentary.
Weren't you questioning whether it was Nikolov rather than Nicole F earlier? What convinced you it was indeed Nicole F?

[Anthro]

So you are talking about the Sat 1 documentary.
Weren't you questioning whether it was Nikolov rather than Nicole F earlier? What convinced you it was indeed Nicole F?

Who is Nikolov?