CB has been declared ‘arguido’ by the PJ.

[Wonderfulspam]

They had to check it out though it could have been Madeleine.

It wasn't though was it. Or do you think there was another Maddie taken from her Holiday? Seems like a very distinct possibility to me.

[Wonderfulspam]

We don't know what happened to Madeleine.

She was abducted & murdered by Brueckner, Wolters said so, so it must be true.

[Wonderfulspam]

Of course probably thousands of them were fake,  but they had to be checked out just in case.

So Brueckner could have been lying when he allegedly said he knew all about what happened to Maddie.
That's possible isn't it.

[G-Unit]

So Brueckner could have been lying when he allegedly said he knew all about what happened to Maddie.
That's possible isn't it.

There are people here who are convinced she was abducted by a stranger.

[Lace]

She was abducted & murdered by Brueckner, Wolters said so, so it must be true.

Wolters hasn't said what evidence he has.    Breueckner told a girlfriend he thinks she could have been handed over.  What he meant by that who knows.   Though they don't know where he was going in his large camper van the night Madeleine disappeared.

[Lace]

There are people here who are convinced she was abducted by a stranger.

That's because she was.

[Lace]

So Brueckner could have been lying when he allegedly said he knew all about what happened to Maddie.
That's possible isn't it.

Why would he lie?   We don't know what he told his friend.

[Vertigo Swirl]

There are people here who are convinced she was abducted by a stranger.

And that's a problem because...?

[Brietta]

Yep and the photo came from the bundle left by Smithman . Now only if they were to question CB he might be an important witness .

It has been established that Brueckner has been questioned by the BKA on behalf of the Policia Judiciaria when they made him an arguido.  Apparently he doesn't appear to relish being a witness important or otherwise as he exercised his right to silence.

You really know nothing about smithman do you?
For all you know he may have been traced as Dr Totman was and could very well be a witness against Brueckner.

[Wonderfulspam]

Why would he lie?   We don't know what he told his friend.

Because people lie about things.
Did you miss the entire conversation we just had.
People make up sightings of Maddie that aren't real, men boast about sexual relationships they haven't  really had. Criminals boast about things they haven't really done.
Are you really that gullible you believe implicitly in everything anyone ever says?

[Wonderfulspam]

And that's a problem because...?

She wasn't.

[Wonderfulspam]

That's because she was.

She wasn't.

[Wonderfulspam]

It has been established that Brueckner has been questioned by the BKA on behalf of the Policia Judiciaria when they made him an arguido.  Apparently he doesn't appear to relish being a witness important or otherwise as he exercised his right to silence.

You really know nothing about smithman do you?
For all you know he may have been traced as Dr Totman was and could very well be a witness against Brueckner.

Then why did Smith say he didn't recognise Brueckner?
I suppose he must have been lying.

[G-Unit]

And that's a problem because...?

It's not a fact, it's a theory.

[Brietta]

There are people here who are convinced she was abducted by a stranger.

There are people on here endeavouring to keep the thread on track and who acknowledge that the mere fact that Portuguese law enforcement appear to be among the numbers who "are convinced she was abducted by a stranger" by dint of the FACT they have constituted him Arguido in Madeleine's inquiry.

To do that they have evidence and all the deflection in the world will not change that.