CB has been declared ‘arguido’ by the PJ.

[jassi]

I can only hope that Brueckner is convicted of the Murder of Madeleine McCann when he is possibly only guilty of Abduction.  That won't half get him talking.

Abduction would get him ten years while Murder would get him an additional fifteen years at least.

So you'd like someone to be wrongly convicted ?

[Eleanor]

So you'd like someone to be wrongly convicted ?

Only the evidence will convict someone.  But refusing to speak will definitely not help what is a disgusting person.

[Wonderfulspam]

And if they don’t find anything in that van sceptics may have to re-consider the “Bruckner is a patsy” theory.

They won't find anything there, they should be tracing Raymond Hewlett's lorry.

Hewlett saw Maddie twice & got close enough to see the mark in her eye, people never lie about these things you see.

Brueckner said he knows all about what happened to Maddie so, yes, it all makes sense now, Hewlett was Brueckner's accomplice.


Paedophile Raymond Hewlett 'admits he saw Madeleine McCann twice' before she disappeared

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1191094/Paedophile-Raymond-Hewlett-admits-I-saw-Madeleine-McCann-twice-disappeared.html

[barrier]

I can only hope that Brueckner is convicted of the Murder of Madeleine McCann when he is possibly only guilty of Abduction.  That won't half get him talking.

Abduction would get him ten years while Murder would get him an additional fifteen years at least.

We all want to know how the notorious abductor got in and out of 5a, which one was he, Tannerman or Smithman or neither, got a tale to tell he has, there again he hasn't.

[barrier]

Afaik no-one has read the Olive Press story because it's behind a paywall. What was posted here was a summary of the story by a poster on another forum. Hardly a media link!

Wolters never named CB because of judicial privacy, Portugal the same so how is it known, Germans leaking like a sieve, perish the thought.

[G-Unit]

So do you accept Brueckner has been questioned by the police?  If not, why not?

The BBC said;

German authorities informed him he was a suspect, at the request of Portuguese prosecutors in Faro.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-61183857

No mention of any questioning.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Wolters never named CB because of judicial privacy, Portugal the same so how is it known, Germans leaking like a sieve, perish the thought.

Hmmm…
“Sources close to the case in Portugal also revealed today that Brueckner answered none of the questions put to him during his jail interrogation, retaining the right to silence afforded him by his new suspect status.”

[Vertigo Swirl]

The BBC said;

German authorities informed him he was a suspect, at the request of Portuguese prosecutors in Faro.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-61183857

No mention of any questioning.

So you do not accept that Brückner has been questioned and will not do so until the BBC reports it?  I see….

[Eleanor]

We all want to know how the notorious abductor got in and out of 5a, which one was he, Tannerman or Smithman or neither, got a tale to tell he has, there again he hasn't.

How the Abductor could have got in and out isn't really relevant.  There were several ways.  Or haven't you actually got that yet?

[Wonderfulspam]

How the Abductor could have got in and out isn't really relevant.  There were several ways.  Or haven't you actually got that yet?

What abductor?

[Eleanor]

All that Brueckner needs to do is to say where he was and what he was doing.

[Wonderfulspam]

All that Brueckner needs to do is to say where he was and what he was doing.

It's none of anybody's business, not even the police, it makes no difference to him if he's a suspect or not, in fact he gets a badge of notoriety & it's probably a massive boost for his ego, good for him.

If the police have concrete evidence, then charge him, if not then that's their problem, he can just carry on drawing cartoons mocking the prosecutor, he isn't going anywhere anytime soon.

[Vertigo Swirl]

So given that Brückner is an arguido and given that he either has been questioned or will be questioned (if you refuse to believe the Mirror) about the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, where does that leave those who still to this day claim there is no evidence of abduction in this case?

[Wonderfulspam]

So given that Brückner is an arguido and given that he either has been questioned or will be questioned (if you refuse to believe the Mirror) about the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, where does that leave those who still to this day claim there is no evidence of abduction in this case?

There is evidence, someone said that Brueckner said he dunnit.

Him & Hewlett.

[Eleanor]

It's none of anybody's business, not even the police, it makes no difference to him if he's a suspect or not, in fact he gets a badge of notoriety & it's probably a massive boost for his ego, good for him.

If the police have concrete evidence, then charge him, if not then that's their problem, he can just carry on drawing cartoons mocking the prosecutor, he isn't going anywhere anytime soon.

You are right about that.  Brueckner isn't going anywhere anytime soon.

However, It was Amaral who was drawing the cartoons.  And I would like to see his phone records.  But then Wolters has probably got those already.