CB has been declared ‘arguido’ by the PJ.

[Eleanor]

So given that Brückner is an arguido and given that he either has been questioned or will be questioned (if you refuse to believe the Mirror) about the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, where does that leave those who still to this day claim there is no evidence of abduction in this case?

Don't worry about it.  Everyone else knows where it is going.

Portugal just snuck in because they are yet again looking like absolute morons.

[Wonderfulspam]

You are right about that.  Brueckner isn't going anywhere anytime soon.

However, It was Amaral who was drawing the cartoons.  And I would like to see his phone records.  But then Wolters has probably got those already.

Why do you want to see his phone records?

They're none of your business, bit nosey isn't it?

[Eleanor]

Why do you want to see his phone records?

They're none of your business, bit nosey isn't it?

Why?

Amaral is a Convicted Liar.  A Thief.  And threatened to Abduct his ex girl friend's small daughter.

[barrier]

All that Brueckner needs to do is to say where he was and what he was doing.

No he doesn't, due judicial procedure says its for the prosecution to prove their case, not the other way around, clearly  by the alleged questioning it was never put to him that they had evidence of the alleged crime, come to that what is the alleged crime seeing has its not official ,he's merely a suspect .

[barrier]

Why?

Amaral is a Convicted Liar.  A Thief.  And threatened to Abduct his ex girl friend's small daughter.

And, CB is the one who has supposedly been made an arguido.

[Vertigo Swirl]

And, CB is the one who has supposedly been made an arguido.

Oh, you think maybe he hasn’t actually been made an arguido then?

[Brietta]

Makes you wonder who's right, doesn't it?

Nope.
The majority have got the gist of the matter which is

• Brueckner is the chief suspect of British investigators
• Brueckner is the prime suspect for German investigators
• Brueckner is the only arguido in the Portuguese investigation

All three investigations seem to have approached solutions and gathered evidence from different angles so I would say that between the three of them they will have covered as many bases as they have access to.

As far as the minutiae is concerned ~ I am content to see if there is enough evidence available to bring charges against him and where that will take us in solving whatever it was that happened to Madeleine and who was responsible

[Vertigo Swirl]

No he doesn't, due judicial procedure says its for the prosecution to prove their case, not the other way around, clearly  by the alleged questioning it was never put to him that they had evidence of the alleged crime, come to that what is the alleged crime seeing has its not official ,he's merely a suspect .

So, let’s back up here.  You have doubts he’s been made an arguido in the first place, so you think it’s only a possibility that he’s been questioned but “clearly “ the police never presented their evidence of the alleged crime at this questioning thing (which probably didn’t happen anyway), a crime  which in any case could be anything from a parking ticket to war crimes as no one has told you exactly what it is and you’re unable to work it out for yourself.  Right you are then. 

[barrier]

So, let’s back up here.  You have doubts he’s been made an arguido in the first place, so you think it’s only a possibility that he’s been questioned but “clearly “ the police never presented their evidence of the alleged crime at this questioning thing (which probably didn’t happen anyway), a crime  which in any case could be anything from a parking ticket to war crimes as no one has told you exactly what it is and you’re unable to work it out for yourself.  Right you are then. 

Back in 2014 supposedly OG asked at least 7  did you kill Madeleine, was that ever confirmed or was it media hype, secondly you don't think if this was asked of CB then it would have been reported, its alleged he was asked , was he in 5a.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Yes, because cops are never bent (even ones with criminal records for lying).  Amaral does not want to be proven wrong,he  has a financial, reputational and therefore vested interest in it, therefore he will do what he can to spread lies and propaganda to ensure that no one is rver brought to justice for this crime. IMO.

[Eleanor]

No he doesn't, due judicial procedure says its for the prosecution to prove their case, not the other way around, clearly  by the alleged questioning it was never put to him that they had evidence of the alleged crime, come to that what is the alleged crime seeing has its not official ,he's merely a suspect .

Okay.  Fine.  I don't care.  Don't supply an alibi even if you have one.  Go to Court and get convicted of something you didn't do.

[Brietta]

Well according to in post 458 what you brought over from the olive press it said "Apparently his lawyer had opted not to attend".
 Perhaps you ought check the veracity of such nonsense before posting.

What an unnecessarily abusive post.

You have accused me of lying.  That is against forum rules.

The Olive Press operates behind a pay wall.

The Olive Press has reported that Brueckner's lawyer opted not to attend.  What is your problem with that.

[Eleanor]

And, CB is the one who has supposedly been made an arguido.

One might wonder about this.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Back in 2014 supposedly OG asked at least 7  did you kill Madeleine, was that ever confirmed or was it media hype, secondly you don't think if this was asked of CB then it would have been reported, its alleged he was asked , was he in 5a.

So what you appear to be  saying is - because the question was reportedly asked in 2014 at one set of arguido interviews by the media that if it hasn’t been reported this time round by the media then as far as you’re concerned he was never asked the question?  And you think this is a logical deduction because..?

[Eleanor]

Oh, you think maybe he hasn’t actually been made an arguido then?

Amaral was an Arguido in The Cipriano Case.  And he was Convicted of Lying.