Anti facebook groups etc

[Eleanor]

No, because IMO you see yourself as superior (ie more sensible) than people who you perceive “believe everything they are told”.  Who are these people, exactly and why does being suspicious of everything you are told make you more sensible?  If you are told for example that a disease could kill you and that getting a vaccine will lower that possibility do you immediately suspect it’s fake news and carry out your own scientific investigation?  Is that the sensible approach iyo?   Do you think people who view abduction as the only logical and plausible explanation for Madeleine’s disappearance are simply sheeple who’ll believe everything they are told?  Are you more sensible (ie superior) than me iyo?

There's nasty and there's nice.  In my opinion.

[G-Unit]

No, because IMO you see yourself as superior (ie more sensible) than people who you perceive “believe everything they are told”.  Who are these people, exactly and why does being suspicious of everything you are told make you more sensible?  If you are told for example that a disease could kill you and that getting a vaccine will lower that possibility do you immediately suspect it’s fake news and carry out your own scientific investigation?  Is that the sensible approach iyo?   Do you think people who view abduction as the only logical and plausible explanation for Madeleine’s disappearance are simply sheeple who’ll believe everything they are told?  Are you more sensible (ie superior) than me iyo?

Well I don't think I'm special, but you obviously find the workings of my mind fascinating. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Well I don't think I'm special, but you obviously find the workings of my mind fascinating. 

I find the workings of many people’s minds quite fascinating- I wouldn’t take that as a compliment however. 

[Mr Gray]

There's plenty of people who'll believe whatever they're told. I'm not one of them.

My opinion of your posts is that you have totally failed to understand the available evidence. 

[G-Unit]

I find the workings of many people’s minds quite fascinating- I wouldn’t take that as a compliment however. 

Why would you imagine I would?

[G-Unit]

My opinion of your posts is that you have totally failed to understand the available evidence.

I have seen no evidence of unfair treatment by the CMOMM forum or fb page.

[Mr Gray]

I have seen no evidence of unfair treatment by the CMOMM forum or fb page.

I'm talking about your ability to understand the evidence in the case in general. You criticise others for simply believing what they are told as though you are in someway superior jwhen in reality.. Imo.. You simply don't understand the evidence.  You seem to think others believe in abduction purely because the mccanns said so.. Ridiculous

[Wonderfulspam]

I'm talking about your ability to understand the evidence in the case in general. You criticise others for simply believing what they are told as though you are in someway superior jwhen in reality.. Imo.. You simply don't understand the evidence. You seem to think others believe in abduction purely because the mccanns said so.. Ridiculous

I get the impression she understands quite well, that there isn't any evidence Maddie was abducted, other than, because the McCanns said so. That, & because Busching said so, & because Wolters said so & SY said so.

I mean, other than that, what evidence is there?

[Brietta]

I have seen no evidence of unfair treatment by the CMOMM forum or fb page.

Your experience of CMOMM is not that of many others;  for example the opening post on this thread referring in general to cultists of this type "Forgive me if i have posted against the rules regarding the subject matter, but for heavens sake has anyone came across anti mccann groups such as facebook and forums then get blocked for asking straight forward questions, to me logic is out of the window. Same stories pop up everyday."

Interesting you single out this particular outlet to defend while ignoring and condoning the concept embodied and embedded in the general hatred.  I think it all rather sad that sites such as those highlighted in the OP still have their adherents peddling their wares despite current events and the change of focus these have dictated.

[barrier]

I'm talking about your ability to understand the evidence in the case in general. You criticise others for simply believing what they are told as though you are in someway superior jwhen in reality.. Imo.. You simply don't understand the evidence.  You seem to think others believe in abduction purely because the mccanns said so.. Ridiculous

Ok your starter for 10, its simple, what evidence is there that a stranger was in 5a and took Madeleine out .

[Vertigo Swirl]

Why would you imagine I would?

Because once again you seemed quite pleased with yourself and the idea that I might find the workings of your mind "fascinating". 

[Vertigo Swirl]

I have seen no evidence of unfair treatment by the CMOMM forum or fb page.

[barrier]

I get the impression she understands quite well, that there isn't any evidence Maddie was abducted, other than, because the McCanns said so. That, & because Busching said so, & because Wolters said so & SY said so.

I mean, other than that, what evidence is there?

Clarence also said the McCann said so : Kate and Gerry are firmly of the view that somebody got into the apartment and took Madeleine out of the window as their means of escape and to do that they did not necessarily have to tamper with anything."

[G-Unit]

I'm talking about your ability to understand the evidence in the case in general. You criticise others for simply believing what they are told as though you are in someway superior jwhen in reality.. Imo.. You simply don't understand the evidence.  You seem to think others believe in abduction purely because the mccanns said so.. Ridiculous

Your ability to understand the evidence in general doesn't impress me either. I just can't be bothered telling you every 5 minutes.

[Brietta]

Ok your starter for 10, its simple, what evidence is there that a stranger was in 5a and took Madeleine out .

An open window and raised shutter and a missing child.

The fact you have based your ideology on the slurring of the witness to that is neither here nor there and only signifies proof positive you have no concept of what is actually going on in the world today.