Anti facebook groups etc

[Mr Gray]

What does the phone call prove exactly & where can I read the statements Wolters has supplied?

seems like youve given up with the no evidence rubbish and moved on to what does the evidence prove...lose one argument so start another one..lol

[Wonderfulspam]

Just off somewhere on a false alibi.

Is it false though?

The girl didn't say she wasn't with him, only that she couldn't remember if she was.

So, she could have been with him, & even if she wasn't, so what?

That would mean he must have been out murdering Maddie, would it?

[Wonderfulspam]

seems like youve given up with the no evidence rubbish and moved on to what does the evidence prove...lose one argument so start another one..lol

Well it's such rubbish evidence I've dismissed it as evidence, & a court would do the same, which is why in my opinion Brueckner isn't being charged.

[Mr Gray]

Well it's such rubbish evidence I've dismissed it as evidence, & a court would do the same, which is why in my opinion Brueckner isn't being charged.

you can dismiss what you like but the FACT is iys evidence,  enough to raise suspicion and warrant further investigation. Wolters says he has more...concrete evidence. I think he has...you dont..we will have to wait and see

[Wonderfulspam]

you can dismiss what you like but the FACT is iys evidence,  enough to raise suspicion and warrant further investigation. Wolters says he has more...concrete evidence. I think he has...you dont..we will have to wait and see

You'll be waiting a long time, Matey, for the foreseeable future actually, but maybe there will be charges after that.

You can always hope can't you.

[Wonderfulspam]

Should I put my trust in Wolters, like you? He's supplied no evidence at all.

Ah, but then he does say he has concrete evidence, not just this flimsy weak ass, tenuous & inadmissible stuff he's revealed like the phonecall that doesn't prove anything & hearsay, & you'd have to be mad not to believe him.

So, that's all folks really, Brueckner murdered Maddie & that's the end of that.

No point the McCanns hoping Maddie is still alive, she's definitely dead, however, they don't seem to have shut down their webpage yet.

I wonder why they haven't done that?

They can't doubt Wolters, surely, I mean, they'd have to be barking mad.

[G-Unit]

Wolters has suplied witness statements...Wolters has supplied evidence of a 30 min phonecal involving a phone belonging to CB ..

That is evidence....you are wrong and obviously dont understand what evidence is

What witness statements has Wolters supplied? A phone ALLEGEDLY belonging to CB pinged with an incoming call. A lot of other phones did too. So what?

[Wonderfulspam]

What witness statements has Wolters supplied? A phone ALLEGEDLY belonging to CB pinged with an incoming call. A lot of other phones did too. So what?

The phone ping places Brueckner directly outside Maddie's window between 7:30pm & 8:00pm.

Maddie wasn't abducted until gone 9:00, so I'm not sure what Brueckner might have got up to during that spare hour but Wolters probably knows.

[Vertigo Swirl]

What witness statements has Wolters supplied? A phone ALLEGEDLY belonging to CB pinged with an incoming call. A lot of other phones did too. So what?

An incoming phone call from a paedophile according to MWT....

[Wonderfulspam]

An incoming phone call from a paedophile according to MWT....

From outside of Luz.

It was probably the leader of the paedophile abduction ring, giving Brueckner his orders & instructions.

But then, after the ultimately successful abduction of Maddie, leaving as they did, no trace behind, they decided not to abduct anymore children in a similar manner ever again.

[jassi]

Who identified the caller and when ?

[G-Unit]

An incoming phone call from a paedophile according to MWT....

That's nothing to do with Wolters - he was hoping the caller would confirm it was CB he spoke to.

[G-Unit]

Who identified the caller and when ?

I think the number was reallocated to someone else, who was thought to be dodgy by MWT's investigator. He wasn't the caller on 3rd May, it was the number of a burner phone then as I understood it.

[Vertigo Swirl]

That's nothing to do with Wolters - he was hoping the caller would confirm it was CB he spoke to.

As if a known paedo is going to do that.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I think the number was reallocated to someone else, who was thought to be dodgy by MWT's investigator. He wasn't the caller on 3rd May, it was the number of a burner phone then as I understood it.

You are merely speculating.