Anti facebook groups etc

[Wonderfulspam]

As if a known paedo is going to do that.

Exactly, poor old Wolters is left stabbing in the dark isn't he, but don't worry, the phone call is totally irrelevant, abduction is already proven if you have concrete murder evidence, as Wolters most definitely has, allegedly.

[Mr Gray]

What witness statements has Wolters supplied? A phone ALLEGEDLY belonging to CB pinged with an incoming call. A lot of other phones did too. So what?

its evidence...you need to understand what teh word means

[G-Unit]

its evidence...you need to understand what teh word means

I understand evidence. What matters is whether it adds knowledge. No details of those statements then?

[Brietta]

What witness statements has Wolters supplied? A phone ALLEGEDLY belonging to CB pinged with an incoming call. A lot of other phones did too. So what?

I have never been of the opinion that the vitriol driving the many, many, many, many, many, many, ubiquitous social media platforms set up solely to slur the family of a missing child could ever have been justified in any way whatsoever.

There is now firm evidence suggesting that the founding concept of the cult has been entirely wrong from start to finish yet there are those still in denial.

It used to be called "Brainwashing" and I believe it is incredibly difficult to overcome.  I think that is "So what?"

[Wonderfulspam]

I have never been of the opinion that the vitriol driving the many, many, many, many, many, many, ubiquitous social media platforms set up solely to slur the family of a missing child could ever have been have been justified in any way whatsoever.

There is now firm evidence suggesting that the founding concept of the cult has been entirely wrong from start to finish yet there are those still in denial.

It used to be called "Brainwashing" and I believe it is incredibly difficult to overcome.  I think that is "So what?"

Such as?

[Brietta]

I understand evidence. What matters is whether it adds knowledge. No details of those statements then?

The investigation have all the evidence that matters to them.  As far as you and other social media pundits are concerned you will be told like the rest of us when the judicial system determines the time is right.

As I see it the evidence that it may add to the 'knowledge' of some is likely to remain nothing more a faint hope.

Just so long as it informs the judiciary though.

[Mr Gray]

I understand evidence. What matters is whether it adds knowledge. No details of those statements then?

You've said no evidence.. The witness statements from his associatesvare all evidence... So you don't understand what evidence is.  It's opinion whether those statements add to knowledge and I would say they clearly do.
The transcripts from the Dark Web chat are evidence.. Where he details what he would like to do to a young child and how he could get away with it if he destroyed the evidence.

[Wonderfulspam]

You've said no evidence.. The witness statements from his associatesvare all evidence... So you don't understand what evidence is.  It's opinion whether those statements add to knowledge and I would say they clearly do.
The transcripts from the Dark Web chat are evidence.. Where he details what he would like to do to a young child and how he could get away with it if he destroyed the evidence.

He said he'd already done it.

MM was the reply.

....and if Brueckner told this other paedo he murdered Maddie & destroyed the evidence then he must have, because he said so, except he forgot to destroy the video/photo/finger painting of Maddie, or he kept hold of it for posterity, since he wasn't going to carry out any further abductions & murders anymore.

[Wonderfulspam]

You've said no evidence.. The witness statements from his associatesvare all evidence... So you don't understand what evidence is.  It's opinion whether those statements add to knowledge and I would say they clearly do.
The transcripts from the Dark Web chat are evidence.. Where he details what he would like to do to a young child and how he could get away with it if he destroyed the evidence.

Based on what?

Brueckner never being charged with murdering Maddie?

[Mr Gray]

Based on what?

Brueckner never being charged with murdering Maddie?

I'm not interested in discussing anything with a poster who is avsel confessed wum.  What you think is of no importance

[John]

All this time has now lapsed and Wolters is no further forward than he was at the beginning of his claims.

I think the guy is a chancer.

[Wonderfulspam]

I'm not interested in discussing anything with a poster who is avsel confessed wum.  What you think is of no importance

Yet you still keep replying.

[Vertigo Swirl]

All this time has now lapsed and Wolters is no further forward than he was at the beginning of his claims.

I think the guy is a chancer.

How do you know this?

[Mr Gray]

All this time has now lapsed and Wolters is no further forward than he was at the beginning of his claims.

I think the guy is a chancer.

Perhaps you are just not following things as close as I am.
I find him very credible.  He says there is a link between the American snd Behan rape... And the maffie case... That could be an important point

[John]

How do you know this?

Obviously he isn't otherwise Madeleine's parents would have been told.