Anti facebook groups etc

[jassi]

You're quite correct, it was Misty who has suggested that CB was paid to abduct and murder her. We're just trying to work out why. Why her?

Well yes, apparently there were so many little blonde girls running about that week, so a paedohile would have been spoiled for choice. Maybe all the others were looked after properly so were not easily available.

[G-Unit]

Well yes, apparently there were so many little blonde girls running about that week, so a paedohile would have been spoiled for choice. Maybe all the others were looked after properly so were not easily available.

What would a paedophile gain by paying for someone else to carry out an abduction and murder?

[jassi]

What would a paedophile gain by paying for someone else to carry out an abduction and murder?

One explanation would be that it was to be filmed and then distributed far and wide on the internet for the enjoyment of other paedophiles.
The flaw in that argument would be that no trace of such a film has surfaced in the intervening years - that we know of.

[Vertigo Swirl]

What would a paedophile gain by paying for someone else to carry out an abduction and murder?

sexual gratification?  Money?  Why does anyone  pay anyone else for carrying out their dirty work? 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Well yes, apparently there were so many little blonde girls running about that week, so a paedohile would have been spoiled for choice. Maybe all the others were looked after properly so were not easily available.

Could be.  The other kids who were left alone were not in a ground floor unlocked apartment as far as I am aware.

[Wonderfulspam]

Could be.  The other kids who were left alone were not in a ground floor unlocked apartment as far as I am aware.

Was Maddie even alive & in the apartment though?

No way to be sure really is there, just have to take the McCanns word for it.

[Rossb]

Was Maddie even alive & in the apartment though?

No way to be sure really is there, just have to take the McCanns word for it.

Even GA believes she was alive on that day, given witness statements i think 4 were given seeing maddy that day.
Some sites and groups disagree lol, earlier in the week. I cant see two ppl with no criminal record prior or after to be able to psychologically hide ur daughter in a foreign country then get so much media attention to follow you and criticise. No sense their.

[Wonderfulspam]

Even GA believes she was alive on that day, given witness statements i think 4 were given seeing maddy that day.
Some sites and groups disagree lol, earlier in the week. I cant see two ppl with no criminal record prior or after to be able to psychologically hide ur daughter in a foreign country then get so much media attention to follow you and criticise. No sense their.

The McCanns are the only witnesses that can vouch for her life after around 5:30pm, 6:00pm on May 3rd.

So, maybe she ceased to be after that. Really is no way to be sure she didn't, other than taking the McCanns word for it I suppose.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I mean can we even be sure Madeleine ever even existed?  It could all be a giant conspiracy, we only have them, their family and friends word for it, maybe the whole thing is a massive hoax just to get fame and fortune? 
Hello Logicman, wherever you may be… 

[Wonderfulspam]

I mean can we even be sure Madeleine ever even existed?  It could all be a giant conspiracy, we only have them, their family and friends word for it, maybe the whole thing is a massive hoax just to get fake and fortune? 
Hello Logicman, wherever you may be… 

The point I made about the McCanns being the only witnesses who can vouch for Maddie's life after 6pm or whenever it was, is absolute fact, & your desperate response just shows how inconvenient you find that.

[Rossb]

The point I made about the McCanns being the only witnesses who can vouch for Maddie's life after 6pm or whenever it was, is absolute fact, & your desperate response just shows how inconvenient you find that.

So provide how it happened, why not murder over accident, 4 witness statements that day said she was alive, explain the timeframe for one.

[Wonderfulspam]

So provide how it happened, why not murder over accident, 4 witness statements that day said she was alive, explain the timeframe for one.

Well, there's simply no way to be sure what happened, if anything, is there.
But, it only takes about 3 minutes to choke, or be choked to death, for example, & as I've already explained, the last confirmed sighting of Maddie was by her parents. So witnesses saw her alive on May 3rd, great, but only her parents can vouch for her after around 6pm. In theory, she could be dead as little as 3 minutes later.

Now, I'm not saying that happened, but there's not really any way to be certain it didn't either.

[Rossb]

Well, there's simply no way to be sure what happened, if anything, is there.
But, it only takes about 3 minutes to choke, or be choked to death, for example, & as I've already explained, the last confirmed sighting of Maddie was by her parents. So witnesses saw her alive on May 3rd, great, but only her parents can vouch for her after around 6pm. In theory, she could be dead as little as 3 minutes later.

Now, I'm not saying that happened, but there's not really any way to be certain it didn't either.

Exactly, so trying to be rralistic within a timeframe removing body and being all good and well in spirit back at the tapas seems odd to me. Odd that the mccanns could put a brave face on and miraculously understand dna, cleansing, hiding etc within a short period of time within a unknown terrain.

[Wonderfulspam]

Exactly, so trying to be rralistic within a timeframe removing body and being all good and well in spirit back at the tapas seems odd to me. Odd that the mccanns could put a brave face on and miraculously understand dna, cleansing, hiding etc within a short period of time within a unknown terrain.

Odd, but not impossible, people can act, deceive, put a brave face on things. Interesting creatures humans.
People can actually lie about things & have other people believe them, it happens all the time.

Not sure why you're bringing DNA & cleaning into this, given the method I described.

Disclaimer: I'm not saying the McCanns are guilty, I just don't see any convincing evidence they're not guilty either.

[Brietta]

Unless, of course, she or her family are not as ordinary as they seem to be. Didn't some anti-McCann groups suggest that's what lay behind the support they received from the authorities? Their supporters, however, have always rejected that theory. Have they changed their minds?

There isn't a social media platform set up by sceptics in existence which doesn't promote the extraordinary notions first promulgated by Amaral and his myth factory regarding political theory and security service involvement etc.

All rather unbalanced I think, to the extent that his delusional obsessions ultimately caused his dismissal from the case.