Anti facebook groups etc

[Rossb]

I was just about to offer the same advice, not that anyone should take advice from me, not with my reputation.
Being lied to and banned on Facebook, then venting about this perceived wrong on another, unrelated forum to members who, at best, have a tenuous link to the former, seems like a lot of burnt energy for little gain. And now I'm doing it! Look what you've dragged me in to, Ross B!

Well taking to a forum yourself to vent and complain is hypocritical in that sense. My point being is it is full of liars and deceit. Sorry for having an opinion. I shud shut up in future and be told what i think. However you are the general the big bad general lmao

[The General]

Actually rarely use it tbf. But i mean why come on here then. Does not seem to acchieve anything either. I joined january. Do not have anywhere near your posts, or likes. So a bit hypocritical if i may say.

I see the seemingly contradictory stance.
You are right though, nothing here is of any consequence, although we have today established there are several members who thought they knew libel law....but didn't.

[The General]

Well taking to a forum yourself to vent and complain is hypocritical in that sense. My point being is it is full of liars and deceit. Sorry for having an opinion. I shud shut up in future and be told what i think. However you are the general the big bad general lmao

My point was, you could cut your avenues of online frustration in half if you want.
You don't need to shut up Ross, despite me being The General, I would never decree such a thing - not hot on the heels of our recent free speech victory.
Go back there and give 'em hell kid (if you're not banned)

[Rossb]

My point was, you could cut your avenues of online frustration in half if you want.
You don't need to shut up Ross, despite me being The General, I would never decree such a thing - not hot on the heels of our recent free speech victory.
Go back there and give 'em hell kid (if you're not banned)

This is where your status comes into play to give me more online free speech mr general. It was more than obvious the mccanns would be ruled against. To me venting is not what i am doing i just question those that feel they have 100 percent correct hypothesis to what happened. Amd think they know the parents as if they were their own. Conundrum it is.

[The General]

This is where your status comes into play to give me more online free speech mr general. It was more than obvious the mccanns would be ruled against. To me venting is not what i am doing i just question those that feel they have 100 percent correct hypothesis to what happened. Amd think they know the parents as if they were their own. Conundrum it is.

A great many commentators, the press included, simply could not discern what was at stake and the nuances of the legal devices, hence how they got it so wrong.
The McCann's were in a position to be able to afford to continue their forlorn fight; the majority are not so fortunate and are ruined as a result, despite potentially being 'right'.
It's time to pay Charon, I believe, and an obol under the tongue simply will not cut it. May I suggest Go Fund Me, or Only Fans?

[Wonderfulspam]

This is where your status comes into play to give me more online free speech mr general. It was more than obvious the mccanns would be ruled against. To me venting is not what i am doing i just question those that feel they have 100 percent correct hypothesis to what happened. Amd think they know the parents as if they were their own. Conundrum it is.

I don't see you questioning abduction very often, at all actually, & there's plenty of people here who believe that hypothesis is a dead cert. Maybe start questioning 'the abduction' a bit more & you'll find your online experience more enjoyable.
I've found comedic value in questioning that particular theory for about 10 years now.

[Rossb]

I don't see you questioning abduction very often, at all actually, & there's plenty of people here who believe that hypothesis is a dead cert. Maybe start questioning 'the abduction' a bit more & you'll find your online experience more enjoyable.
I've found comedic value in questioning that particular theory for about 10 years now.

Yeah you would be right. Ten years you say? Via here via amaral or via facebook? Hope you were not venting. Of course absence of evidence does not assume ones guilt. I am open to different theories i just only say its unlikely they were involved and not only mention the ppl who are consumed with wild conspiracy theories are those that are against them. Cant see you bringing up or debating she was sold to the epsteins.

[The General]

Yeah you would be right. Ten years you say? Via here via amaral or via facebook? Hope you were not venting. Of course absence of evidence does not assume ones guilt. I am open to different theories i just only say its unlikely they were involved and not only mention the ppl who are consumed with wild conspiracy theories are those that are against them. Cant see you bringing up or debating she was sold to the epsteins.

Too young then, but not now I assume.

[Wonderfulspam]

Yeah you would be right. Ten years you say? Via here via amaral or via facebook? Hope you were not venting. Of course absence of evidence does not assume ones guilt. I am open to different theories i just only say its unlikely they were involved and not only mention the ppl who are consumed with wild conspiracy theories are those that are against them. Cant see you bringing up or debating she was sold to the epsteins.

Here, only place I wum.
No other forums, didn't take a proper interest in the case until about 2012.
Came here & found countless idiots insisting Maddie was abducted, when there's simply no good reason to believe she ever was.

[Eleanor]

Most of The Sceptics only came along when they saw an opportunity for a punch up.  They aren't here because they actually care about anything, least of all Madeleine.  It is their own personal failures that motivate them.

[Wonderfulspam]

Most of The Sceptics only came along when they saw an opportunity for a punch up.  They aren't here because they actually care about anything, least of all Madeleine.  It is their own personal failures that motivate them.

Why would I care about Madeleine?
Bit pointless really, she's dead after all.

[G-Unit]

I see the seemingly contradictory stance.
You are right though, nothing here is of any consequence, although we have today established there are several members who thought they knew libel law....but didn't.

Ditto with human rights law.

[The General]

Most of The Sceptics only came along when they saw an opportunity for a punch up.  They aren't here because they actually care about anything, least of all Madeleine.  It is their own personal failures that motivate them.

I go to Ju Jitsu for a punch up; I come here to gloat at being 100% right 70% of the time.

[faithlilly]

I go to Ju Jitsu for a punch up; I come here to gloat at being 100% right 70% of the time.

Would it be too utterly fawning to say I’ve missed you General?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Would it be too utterly fawning to say I’ve missed you General?